關於 communities biology ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

【#加速婦女經濟賦權 直播你看了沒❓】

來來來，研討會金句都在這邊
⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🙋‍♀️

📣 #台灣 🇹🇼政務委員 #唐鳳
Biology should not determine one’s destiny.
生理不應該決定一個人的命運。

📣無任所大使🇹🇼 林靜儀醫師 @LinCYminorta
The more female participation, the more gender-based policy making
女性參與越多，具性平觀點的政策就越多。

📣#瑞典 🇸🇪性別平等部政務次長 Karin Strandås
Economic gender equality means that women and men have the same opportunities to reach their full potential throughout their life cycle.
經濟上的性別平等意味著，男女在其整個生命週期中都有同等機會發揮其全部潛能。

📣#美國🇺🇸 國際開發金融公司副總裁Algene T. Sajery
Investing in women means investing in communities, investing in stability and investing in sustainable economic development.
投資婦女意味著對社區、安定和永續經濟發展的投資。

📣#科索沃🇽🇰 NGO女性互助 執行長Iliriana Gashi
Giving the rights to women and more economic power in women's hands is good for men, too.
賦予婦女權利和增強婦女的經濟權力對男人也有好處。

看得不清楚❓我們演給你看⬇️⬇️⬇️
影片 普累▶️下去就對囉‼️

魔法新聞稿 🔎 https://reurl.cc/Q7276M

#魔法部對於性別平權94這麼重視
#聯合國第65屆婦女地位委員會
#CSW65

.
.
.
Did you check out the virtual forum on accelerating women's economic empowerment we live-streamed last night? If so, let us know what ideas really resonated with you!

If you missed it, not to worry, we've got you covered with this TLDR video featuring key quotes from the main speakers!

#WomensHistoryMonth #WomensPower #SDG5 #GenderEquality #WomensEmpowerment

跨領域環境議題座談1

【Toward a new paradigm of ecology: The importance of ontogenetic growth and niche shift】

主講：仲澤剛史 (副教授 成功大學生命科學系)

時間：2017.10.27（五) 12:20～14:00

地點：臺灣大學全球變遷研究中心前棟2樓202會議室（近台大醉月湖畔）

報名網址：https://docs.google.com/…/1FAIpQLSe8ohqxzNgzTFlL6w…/viewform

Abstract
Community ecology is traditionally species-based and assumes that species comprise identical individuals. However, intraspecific variation is ubiquitous in nature because of ontogenetic growth and critical in food-we dynamics. To understand individual interaction-mediated food webs, researchers have recently focused on body size as the most fundamental biological aspect and assessed a parameter called the predator–prey mass ratio (PPMR). Herein, I review the conceptual development of the PPMR and suggest four major concerns regarding its measurement: (1) PPMR should be measured at the individual level because species-averaged values distort actual feeding relationships, (2) individual-level PPMR data on gape-unconstrained predators (e.g., terrestrial carnivores) are limited because previous studies have targeted gape-limited fish predators, (3) predators’ prey size selectivity (preferred PPRM) is conceptually different from dietary prey size (realized PPMR) and should be distinguished by incorporating environmental prey abundance information, and (4) determinants of preferred PPMR, rather than those of realized PPMR, should be identified to describe size-dependent predation. Future studies are encouraged to explore not only predation but also other interaction types (e.g., competition, mutualism, and herbivory) at the individual level. However, this is not likely to occur while ecological communities are still considered to be interspecific interaction networks. To resolve this situation and more comprehensively understand biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, I suggest that community ecology requires a paradigm shift in the unit of interaction from species to individuals, similar to evolutionary biology, which revolutionized the unit of selection, because interactions occur between individuals.