關於 consumer goods industry ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

หมากฝรั่งคิดคิด หายไปไหน? / โดย ลงทุนแมน
“คิดคิดเพื่อนเคี้ยว ถ้าคิดจะเคี้ยว เคี้ยวคิดคิด”
สโลแกนติดหูของหมากฝรั่งคิดคิด
ที่เชื่อว่าหลายคนน่าจะเคยได้ยินกันมา
...Continue ReadingWhere has the gum to think and think? / by investing manly
′′ Think, think, friend, chew, if you want to chew, chew, think ′′
Catchy slogan of gum thinking thinking
I believe that many people should have heard this.

But today have we ever noticed that gum can think about it. It's gone from the shelf.
Why is it like that
And now what is the gum thinking thinking
Invest man will tell you about it.
╔═══════════╗
Scenario and Economic Update with Blockdit
Podcasts available on the go
Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
Gum thinking, produced by the limited Meng Seng limited Candy Factory which was founded since 2506 by Mr Chan Taem Kangkha. In the beginning, the Meng Seng Candy Factory manufactured ′′ Gum. Parrot ′′ which was considered a popular gum for kids in the past.

The success of parrot gum
In 2527, the company began to expand machinery to produce another brand of gum called ′′ thinking gum ′′ which appears to be unexpected because of modern packaging. Straight in bright yellow with blue red and green band on the box.

Importantly, the advertising of chewing gum thinking using slogan which makes most people remember easy to catchy is ′′ thinking, thinking, chewing friends, chewing, thinking ′′ makes gum thinking, thinking, thinking, chewing, thinking, chewing, thinking, chewing, thinking, chewing

At present, there will be 2 groups in Thailand.
1. gum with sugar (Sugarised Gum)
2. sugar-free gum (Sugar-Free Gum) but use sweetener instead of sugar.

But did you know that over time, the gum market keeps receding.
Year 2557, the gum market value is around 3,000 million baht.
Year 2561, the gum market value is around 2,000 million baht.

Apart from consumer behaviour that changes, the younger generation chews gum less.
The growth of trends in staying healthy over the years has also affected the gum business.

Gum can contain sugar ingredients or sweeteners instead of sugar. So consumers who care about health avoid.

And gum thinks about the name that people in the past have been familiar with. It's slowly gone away. It's why people say that gum thinks about it. But in fact, the gum is still thinking about it. But there will be some channels for sale.

So what do you think about the results of gum?
Income and profit of the company. limited Candy Factory. Manufacturer of thinking gum and candy.
Year 2562 Income 39 million baht.

However, in addition to the gum and candy manufacturing business, the company has expanded to other related businesses.

Nakhon Liang Glucose limited, a glucose-sized manufacturer which is used as an important ingredient in the food industry.
Year 2562 Income 893 million baht.

The company of M. S. S. Group limited is the organizer of snack and gum products of all affiliates.
Year 2562 Income 189 million baht.

Tai Yok Glucose limited is the leading supplier of Glucose Sizesirappropriate Fruit Savings, Monohydrates, which are the essential ingredients of cooking.
Year 2562 Income 775 million baht.

When all proceeds are gathered, we will see that the whole company has a total income of almost 1,900 million baht. It's considered not too small.

From the past, the income of the gum business is the main business. But today, it's reduced to 2 % of the total income in the company.

When things were like this in 2562, the company began to adjust the strategy to run business into another business with handshake with clothing brands and bags to produce fashionable goods, including entering into the healthy food market to grow the company. Long term.

Adaptation of gum thinking is an interesting case study.
Imagine if we went back time 30 years ago and someone told us that one day, gum thinking about doing business, clothes or food, health, we might think it's strange.

But today, consumer behaviors have changed to different from the past. Some products from one day were popular. One day, popularity changed.

Therefore, adaptation is essential in making our business survive.

If I read this here
We don't think that gum can't think. It's as bad as we think.
And expanding the business to do something else that we didn't expect..
╔═══════════╗
Scenario and Economic Update with Blockdit
Podcasts available on the go
Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
Follow to invest manly at
Website - longtunman.com
Blockdit-blockdit.com/longtunman
Facebook-@[113397052526245:274: lngthun mæn]
Twitter - twitter.com/longtunman
Instagram-instagram.com/longtunman
YouTube - youtube.com/longtunman
References
-http://www.mengsengsweets.com/about/
-http://fic.nfi.or.th/MarketOverviewDomesticDetail.php?id=95
-https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/835100
-https://smartsme.co.th/content/220637Translated

剛好看到楊斯棓醫師的臉書。過去與許多在台投資的商會朋友，特別是受薪員工常聊到，很多在台工作的專業人員，例如高科技、資安產業的朋友，儘管薪資高，但是在台灣的所得級距，常常就會到40%的級距。

但台灣各大企業繳的稅卻又低又少「不僅是亞洲四小龍中最低，只佔ＧＤＰ的二．七％，也比中國的三．六％低，更不到香港的一半。」（天下雜誌-企業好大稅好低）

我們都歡迎大筆投資進來台灣，不管是工廠、設備、土地，但是所有投資裡頭，最能夠發揮綜合效益的，就是人才資源。

然而這些專業人士，不管本籍外籍，所得來源通常不來自被動式收入，不來自租金、有價證卷等其他資本孳息等收入。（巴菲特曾說，他繳的稅率比清潔工低）

而這些專業人士，通常也更會將他們的薪資收入，更大比例重新在一般「消費市場」，而非「資本市場」消費。

他們會花費在下一代的教育，他們生活周遭的市場、餐廳、
遊樂設施，而這些消費也會有正面的效應，回到一般民眾。一層一層下去，對整體經濟更會有正面的影響。

台灣接下來面對的挑戰，更需要一群來自海內外的所有專業人才一起打拼，讓簇新的思想以及判斷事物的不同原則一起激盪，從移民法規、稅制，我們都可以破除所有前例，就算會經歷一些辯論、陣痛。

或許除了專注於貨物、商品流通，我們更該注重國家發展最重要的主軸：人。

In the past, I often talked to many friends in business associations investing in Taiwan, especially their salaried employees. Many professionals working in Taiwan, such as high-tech and security industry friends, despite the relatively high salary have an income gap in Taiwan that often reaches the 40% level compared to other markets.

However, the taxes paid by Taiwan’s major enterprises are low. "Not only is it the lowest among the four Asian dragons, it only accounts for 2.7% of GDP, it is also lower than China’s 3.6%, and it is less than half of Hong Kong." World Magazine-Enterprises have great taxes and low taxes)

We all welcome large investments in Taiwan, whether it is factories, equipment, or land, but among all the investments, the most comprehensive benefit is human resources.

However, these professionals, regardless of their foreign nationality, usually do not derive their income from passive income, nor from income such as rent and other certificates such as securities. (Buffett once said that he pays a lower tax rate than cleaners)

And these professionals usually also reinvest their salary income in a larger proportion in the general "consumer market" rather than the "capital market".

They will spend their education on the next generation, the markets, restaurants,
Amusement facilities, and these consumptions will also have a positive effect, returning to the general public. Layer by layer these have a positive impact on the overall economy.

Taiwan’s next challenge will require a group of professionals from all over the world to work together to stir up new ideas and different principles for evaluating things. From immigration laws and tax systems, we can all break all the previous examples, even if we will experience some debates and pain points.

Perhaps in addition to focusing on the circulation of goods and commodities, we should pay more attention to the most important main pillar of national development: people.

quote:"The U.S. has run the experiment on steel tariffs before. In March 2002, President George W. Bush imposed sweeping tariffs and quotas on a range of steel imports before dropping them in late 2003. The tariffs were responsible for a 3% increase in steel prices and were “extremely disruptive to U.S. firms that rely on steel imports to make consumer goods,” concluded a 2003 review of Mr. Bush’s move by the Peterson Institute of International Economics.
A 2003 study by research firm Trade Partnership Worldwide estimated that higher steel prices cost 200,000 steel-consuming jobs that year, largely in manufacturing. The entire steel industry employed only 187,500 workers at the time, the report said. Laura M. Baughman, the firm’s president and a co-author of the 2003 study, said of Mr. Trump’s new tariffs: “steel consumers will get hit again.”"

https://www.wsj.com/…/trump-administration-beats-back-warni…