關於 do not turn off target ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

[ Canon EOS R5...not a review!!! ]

ออกตัวล้อฟรีตั้งแต่หัวโพส ว่านี่ไม่ใช่การรีวิวนะ!!

เรื่องมันมีอยู่ว่า...เมื่อปี 10 ปีก่อน ตอนที่ผมเริ่มหัดถ่ายภาพใหม่ ๆ…
.
.
เฮ้ย เดี๋ยว...ย้อนไกลไป 😝
.
.
อะ เอาใหม่ คืองี้ครับ...เมื่อ 3 เดือนก่อน ตอนที่ Canon ประกาศเปิดตัวเจ้า Canon EOS R5 เรือธงน้องใหม่ไร้กระจกออกมา ผมอ่านสเปคด้านการถ่ายรูปโดยคร่าวแล้วรู้สึกว้าวอยู่ในใจมิใช่น้อย มันเป็นสเปคแบบเดียวกับที่ผมคิดว่ากล้องที่ครบเครื่องเรื่องถ่ายภาพในยุคนี้ ควรจะมีสเปคประมาณนี้แหละ...ก็เลยเป็นที่มาของความอยากรู้อยากลองด้วยตัวเองว่ามันเจ๋งจริงรึเปล่า
.
.
และด้วยความช่วยเหลือจากน้าไก่ Niphon Saengpueng ผู้มากบารมีในวงการกล้อง (หรอฟระ) ติดต่อประสานงานกับผู้ใหญ่ใจดีผู้มากบารมีในวงการกล้อง (ตัวจริง) ให้อีกที ผมจึงได้โอกาสติดต่อกับ Canon Marketing Thailand เพื่อขอยืม Canon EOS R5 มาทดสอบให้หายคัน ด้วยประการฉะนี้
.
.
อย่างที่ได้ออกตัวตั้งแต่ต้นครับ...นี่ไม่ใช่การรีวิวกล้อง...แต่มันคือการเอาไปลองใช้ และทดสอบเฉพาะเรื่องที่ผมอยากรู้อยากเห็น แล้วเอามาเล่าให้ฟังแบบสั้น ๆ (แต่ดันเกริ่นซะยาว 😅)...ซึ่งขอออกตัวอีกทีว่างานนี้ทำฟรีไม่มีค่าจ้างแต่อย่างใด...ซึ่งตรงนี้ต้องขอขอบคุณทาง Canon Marketing Thailand จริง ๆ ที่แม้ว่าจะบอกเงื่อนไขไปว่า ผมไม่ทำรีวิวนะ แค่อยากจะลองเฉย ๆ...คือเรื่องเยอะขนาดนี้ก็ยังอุตส่าห์ให้มาลอง อันนี้ขอบคุณจากใจเลยครับ 🙏
.
.
เอ้า เกริ่นยาวเหยียด มาเข้าเรื่องกันสักที 😅...ไหน ๆ ก็ได้ลองแล้ว ผมก็เลยอยากมาสรุปเป็นเรื่องที่ชอบ และไม่ชอบ เอาไว้ให้ดูกันสักหน่อยครับ
.
.
❤ ชอบ
- Eye AF ในโหมด focus ที่เน้นใบหน้า สามารถเปลี่ยนตา เปลี่ยนคน ได้ง่ายมาก ๆ...เลิฟเลย ณ จุดนี้ (เมื่อไหร่กล้องเราจะเลือกเปลี่ยนตา เปลี่ยนคนได้บ้าง 😭)

- Eye AF ทำงานได้ดีและแม่นยำมาก ๆ

- Auto focus bracketing...น่าจะช่วยให้ถ่าย focus stacking ได้ง่ายขึ้น

- Full touch screen ลื่นไหลปรู้ดปร้าด ใช้ง่าย

- จอแบบ fully-articulated LCD ทำให้ ถ่ายภาพเรียดพื้นในแนวตั้งได้ง่ายเลย

- การลบรูปทำได้ง่ายมาก ๆ (คือกล้องปัจจุบันที่ใช้อยู่ เวลาเมมเต็มแล้วอยากลบหลาย ๆ รูป มันยุ่งยากกว่าพอควร เลยปลื้มปริ่มถึงขนาดเอาเรื่องลบรูปมาเป็นเรื่องที่ชอบ 😂😂)
.
.
❌ ไม่ชอบ
- ค่อนข้างใหญ่ เทอะทะไปหน่อย เริ่มหนักไปนิด (อันนี้เป็นเรื่องของสรีระ และวิธีการจับถือของผมเอง ที่ไม่ถนัดกับการจับกล้องใหญ่ ๆ...แม้แต่ Sony A7r IV ผมยังรู้สึกว่ากริปเริ่มใหญ่ไป จับไม่ถนัด 😭)

- ปุ่มเปิดปิดอยู่ทางซ้าย ทำให้ใช้งานมือเดียวแบบยกกล้องขึ้นมาแล้วเปิดถ่ายทันทีไม่ได้ (อันนี้ก็เป็นเรื่องของความเคยชินซะมากกว่า)
.
.
⭕ ข้อสังเกต
- ในการถ่ายภาพติดตามวัตถุที่เคลื่อนไหว พบว่าการใช้ electronic shutter จะ refocus เร็วและเข้าเป้ากว่า mechanical shutter มาก ๆ อย่างมีนัยสำคัญ (ทดสอบโดยใช้เลนส์ RF 85 f/1.2 เปิด f/2.0 โดยให้ลูกวิ่งเข้าหา แล้วกดปุ่มให้จับโฟกัสที่ลูกตา จากนั้นก็รัว...พบว่า mechanical shutter เข้าเป้าแค่ไม่กี่เฟรมแรก จากนั้นหลุดหมดเลย ในขณะที่ electronic shutter เข้าเป้าหมด จนกระทั่งลูกวิ่งเข้ามาใกล้มาก ๆ จริง ๆ จึงจะโฟกัสไม่เข้าเป้า)

- อย่างไรก็ตาม ในการใช้งาน electronic shutter จะมี effect จาก rolling shutter ที่เห็นค่อนข้างชัด ทำให้ตอนถ่ายวัตถุที่เคลื่อนไหวแล้วเราหันกล้องตาม ฉากหลังจะล้ม ๆ เอียง ๆ ให้ขัดตาขัดใจอยู่บ้าง (แต่อันนี้งงเองเหมือนกันว่า main subject กลับดูปกติ ไม่รู้ว่าเกี่ยวกับการที่เราหันกล้องตาม main subject รึเปล่าก็ไม่รู้??)

- ลองถ่ายคนในร้านอาหารตอนกลางคืน ที่ไฟไม่ได้สว่างมากนัก สามารถจับโฟกัสได้แม่นยำดี (เร็วรึเปล่าไม่ได้สังเกตครับ แหะ ๆ 😅)

- อันนี้ไม่แน่ใจว่าคิดไปเองรึเปล่าว่ามี lag แบบสังเกตได้...ไม่รู้ว่า user lag, evf lag หรือ shutter lag กันแน่ 😅

- Eye AF มีเอ๋อ ๆ บางครั้ง ไปจับวัตถุที่เป็นรูปวงกลมอื่น ๆ แทนลูกตาคนจริง ๆ ก็มี 😂
.
.
💥 โดยสรุป
สำหรับผม (ซึ่งก็ถ่ายรูปมาอย่างจำกัดจำเขี่ย) ผมว่าเป็นกล้องถ่ายภาพที่ครบเครื่องมาก ๆ เลยครับ คือ performance ระดับนี้ เอาไปถ่ายอะไรก็ได้หมดล่ะมั้ง ยิ่งรุ่นต่อ ๆ ไป ก็คงสมบูรณ์แบบมากขึ้นเรื่อย ๆ...ใครที่เป็นแฟน Canon หรือแฟนค่ายอื่นที่อยากเปลี่ยนมาใช้ mirrorless...EOS R5 น่าจะเป็นหนึ่งในตัวเลือกที่ดีที่สุดในท้องตลาดเวลานี้เลยครับ
.
.
ปล. เน้นเอามาลองดูเรื่องการจับถือ และการ focus เป็นหลัก เนื่องจากคิดว่าเรื่องพวกนี้ต้องลองเองถึงจะรู้ ในขณะที่เรื่อง dynamic range, noise และกันสั่น ผมไม่ได้ทดสอบเลย เพราะคิดว่าพวกนี้มีคนทดสอบกันเยอะแล้ว ดูจากรีวิวอื่น ๆ ก็คงไม่ต่างกันครับ
.
.
ปปล. เนื่องจากไม่เคยใช้ Canon มาก่อน ประกอบกับมีเวลาลองเล่นไม่กี่วัน ดังนั้น หากมีการให้ความเห็นที่ผิดพลาดประการใด อาจเกิดจาก user error เองก็เป็นได้ ซึ่งผมต้องขออภัยล่วงหน้ามา ณ ที่นี้ด้วยครับ
.
.
ปปปล. ภาพประกอบส่วนใหญ่ปรับแต่งไม่มาก ปรับแสงปรับสีนิดหน่อย ยกเว้นภาพถ่ายในร้านอาหารที่ปรับ WB ค่อนข้างเยอะ และภาพถ่ายทะเลที่แต่งแบบจัดเต็ม…คือภาพประกอบอาจจะดูงั้น ๆ (หรือถึงขั้นที่ว่า ไม่สวยเลย) ขอจงโปรดเข้าใจ...มีเวลาจับอยู่ไม่กี่วัน แต่แดดไม่มา แสงไม่มีเลยครับ 😭😭...ถือซะว่ามาอ่านบทความก็แล้วกันครับ 🙏

#BornToRule #CanonThailand #Canon #EOSR5

www.instagram.com/gift.of.light
www.twitter.com/GiftOfLight
[ Canon EOS R5...not a review!!! ]

Free wheels from the head. Posting that this is not a review!!

The story is... 10 years ago when I learned to take new photos...
.
.
Hey wait... way back 😝
.
.
Let's do it again... 3 months ago when Canon announced the release of Canon EOS EOS, the new flagship without glass. I read the specs of the photoshoot and I felt wowed in my heart. It's the same specification. I think a camera that is complete in this era should have a spec like this... so it's the source of curiosity. Try it yourself if it's really cool.
.
.
And with the help of the prestige auntie Kai @[698452170:2048:Niphon Saengpueng] in the camera (Avala). Coordinate with the kind adults and prestige in the camera (the real ones). So I got the opportunity to contact Canon Marketing Thailand to borrow Canon EOS. R5 Let's test it to get rid of itchy.
.
.
As I have been published since the beginning... This is not a camera review... but it is a try and test. Only what I want to know and tell you briefly. (but Dungray It's long 😅)... which I'm going out again that this job is free. No payment at all... Thank you Canon Marketing Thailand for real. Despite the conditions that I don't do any reviews. I want to try it... Well, there are many things like this. I still want you to try this. Thank you from my heart. 🙏
.
.
Well, the long granny. Let's get into the story. 😅... I tried it and I want to conclude it. It's like and don't like it. Let's see it.
.
.
❤ I like it
- Eye AF in focus mode, facial focus can change eyes, change people easily... Love at this point. (When will the camera choose to change the eyes, change the person 😭)

- Eye AF works very well and precisely

- Auto focus bracketing... should make focus stacking easier

- Full touch screen. Smooth. Easy to use.

- fully-articulated LCD screen makes it easy to capture vertical flooring photos.

- Deleting photos is very easy. (It's the current camera I use. When the meme is full, I want to delete many photos. It's a bit more complicated than enough. I'm impressed. I'm taking photos to delete them as I like them. 😂😂)
.
.
❌ don't like
- A little bit big, a little bit too heavy (This is all about the hustle and my own way of holding on to the big camera... Even Sony A7r IV, I feel the grip is getting big. I can't catch you well 😭)

- Turn off button on the left. One-handed use in the camera and can't be taken instantly. (This is more of a familiarity)
.
.
⭕ Observation
- In a portrait of a moving object, the use of an electronic shutter is refocus faster and more targeted than mechanical shutter significantly. (Tested using RF 85 f / 1.2 lens, f / 2.0 open f / 2.0 by giving the ball a run. Approaching and pressing the button to focus on the eyeball then... Found that mechanical shutter hit the target for the first few frames, then dropped out while electronic shutter was all over the target until the kid ran closer to the target.)

- However, in electronic shutter, there is a effect from rolling shutter that I see relatively clearly. When I film a moving object, I turn the camera to the backdrop. I will fall and lean and interrupt some. (But this one is confusing, I am also main. subject is back to normal. I don't know if it's about us turning the camera on main subject or not??)

- Try filming people in restaurants at night where the light isn't so bright. You can focus on precisely. (Fast or not. I didn't notice. Haha 😅)

- I'm not sure if I think about it myself that I have an observable lag... I don't know user lag, evf lag or shutter lag 😅

- Eye AF has ah, sometimes to catch other circular objects instead of eyeballs. 😂
.
.
💥 by summary
For me (which I took limited photos, I think it's a very full camera. This level of performance can be taken. The more the next generation will be perfect... Who is this? Canon fans or other camp fans who want to change to mirrorless... EOS EOS is probably one of the best options on the market at this time.
.
.
Ps. Focusing on this. Try it on hold and focus mainly because I think that these things have to try for myself. While the dynamic range, noise and vibration, I didn't test it because I think there are a lot of tests. See from other reviews. There would be no difference.
.
.
Ps. Since I have never used Canon before, I have a few days to try to play. If there are any wrong comments, it may be from User error. I apologize in advance.
.
.
Ps. ps. Most of the illustrations are not much customizable, a bit of color adjustment, except for a photo in a restaurant with quite a lot of WB and a fully edited sea photo... Well, the illustration may look so (or not so pretty). Please. I understand... I have a few days to catch, but the sun doesn't come to light. I don't have any 😭😭... Let's just read the article. 🙏

#BornToRule #CanonThailand #Canon #EOSR5

www.instagram.com/gift.of.light
www.twitter.com/GiftOfLightTranslated

【#TheDiplomat: 沈旭暉隨緣家書英文版🇭🇰】很久沒有向國際關係評論網 The Diplomat 供稿，但國際線十分重要，不應放棄。這次他們希望分享23條、國安法、反恐法風雨欲來的「新香港」前瞻，願國際社會能多了解快將出現的危機：

While the world is preoccupied with a fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been tightening its political grip on all aspects of Hong Kong’s civil society. Rumor has it that Beijing will push through legislating national security laws under Article 23 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law by unconventional means, such as massively disqualifying pro-democratic legislators or even directly applying a national law, widely argued as a major step to destroy the rights and freedom of Hong Kongers, and bring Chinese authoritarianism to Hong Kong.

After the 2019 protests, the administration of Carrie Lam, who theoretically is still leading the special administrative region of China, has little political capital at stake, with its legitimacy reaching rock bottom. The pro-government camp has dwindling prospects for the city’s upcoming Legislative Council election. The government‘s ”nothing to lose“ mentality is apparent from its recent blatant reinterpretation of the Basic Law’s Article 22 (another article that limits the influence of China’s offices in Hong Kong’s internal affairs). The debate is nothing new, but the pressure this time is quite different.

This article highlights the different strategies Beijing could adopt to enact Article 23 insidiously or under disguise to avoid backlash from the international community, while continuing to reap benefits from the city’s globally recognized special status. This seems to be part of Beijing’s brinkmanship to bring Hong Kong protesters and their supporters to their knees and move the city closer to authoritarianism. To counter these moves, Hong Kongers must define the boundaries beyond which Hong Kong falls into authoritarian rule and make a case as to why the city’s downfall is detrimental to the international community‘s interest.

The Long-Term Controversy Over National Security Laws

Back in 2003, the implementation of Article 23 was thwarted by the moderate pro-establishment politician James Tien. In face of overwhelming public disapproval of the law, he withdrew support and votes from his Liberal Party. However, 17 years later, it is hard to imagine Beijing following the old legislative playbook: start with a public consultation, followed by public discourse and political debate, and end with the majority rule. This playbook only works in peaceful societies ruled by a trustworthy government with integrity.

The aftermath of 2003, as well as the 2019 protests, should have taught Beijing and the Hong Kong government a lesson: pushing through national security legislation in a flawed parliament controlled by the minority pro-government camp would inevitably set off another full city-scale protest — and undoubtedly more fierce and focused this time. Given the current government’s numerous displays of dishonesty, it is conceivable that they will embark on a less-traveled path to implement Article 23.

Strategy One: “Anti-Terrorism”

In principle, one possible strategy could be to directly enact Chinese national law across Hong Kong, which can be achieved by declaring a state of emergency in the city. However, this is risky business as it would tarnish the integrity of “one country two systems” and subsequently Hong Kong’s international standing. Beijing, a risk-averse regime, is also unwilling to see Hong Kong’s status as a middleman for laundering money disappear into thin air.

Instead, Beijing could be concocting a narrative that would see Chinese national law applied to Hong Kong while not damaging Hong Kong’s international standing and Beijing’s own interests. The key word in this script is “anti-terrorism.” As early as 2014, pro-Beijing scholars have been claiming the emergence of “local terrorist ideology” on Hong Kong soil. Since the anti-extradition bill protests last year, government rhetoric frequently described the protests, which caused no deaths at all in the entire year, with phrases like “inclination to terrorist ideology.” That was a signal to the world that Hong Kong’s internal conflicts had ballooned into a national security issue. This gives the government the legitimacy to justify the implementation of Chinese national laws across the highly autonomous region to counter terrorism. The Chinese government knows that if it can persuade the world that terrorism exists in Hong Kong, and that it is as severe as the terror threat facing many other nations today, the international community will be less critical of Beijing’s actions in Hong Kong. Enacting Chinese laws directly is a convenient path that will save Beijing from having to tackle Hong Kong’s internal conflicts, basically turning the Hong Kong issue into a nonissue.

Strategy Two: Stacking the Legislature by Disqualifying Candidates

An even bolder strategy was probably foretold by a recent incident where the Hong Kong government and Beijing’s agencies for Hong Kong affairs (HKMAO and the Liaison Office) jointly criticized lawmaker Dennis Kwok for filibustering, framing it as “misconduct in public office” and “violating his oath.” It is incomprehensible to claim that filibustering goes against a lawmaker’s main duty; rather, it is common understanding that legislative work includes debating the law and representing public opinion against unreasonable laws. In a parliament controlled by the minority, pro-democratic members representing the majority of Hong Kongers are forced to express their objections using means like filibustering. Wouldn’t a lack of different political opinions turn the legislative branch into a rubber-stamp institution?

The above allegation has set a dangerous precedent for twisting the logic behind a certain provision in the Basic Law to target opposing lawmakers. In other words, to fulfill Beijing’s interpretation of the principal requirement for holding public office in Hong Kong, one could be required to take a meticulously legalistic approach to uphold the Basic Law down to its every single wording. A public official, by this new definition, not only needs to support “one country, two systems” or object Hong Kong independence, but also must abide by every single provision in the Basic Law. Worst of all, based on the previous cases, whether an official’s words or actions oversteps a provision is up to Beijing’s interpretation of his/her “intent.”

If this approach is applied, in the next election, there might be additional official questions for screening candidates like the following: “The Basic Law states that the enactment of Article 23 is a constitutional duty. Failing to support Article 23 legislation violates the Basic Law. Do you support it?” This question would suffice to disqualify even moderate or even pro-establishment candidates like James Tien. Even if any pro-democratic candidates were elected, once Article 23 re-enters the legislative process, they could risk ouster by raising objections.

Despite the absurdity of this tactic, the Chinese regime may just be tempted enough if such a strategy could resolve two of China’s current nuisances — voices of dissent in the Legislative Council and the previous failure to implement Article 23.

Strategy Three: The “Boiling Frog Effect”

Article 23 is not yet implemented, but the dystopian world that the protesters pictured in 2003 is already becoming reality. Regular citizens have been persecuted for “sedition” for sharing their views on social media or participating in legal protests; workers face retaliation for taking part in strikes; corporations are pressured to publicly side with the government’s stance; employees who have the “wrong” political views are fired; schools have been closely monitored for teaching material; protest-supporting fundraisers were framed for money laundering; a retweet or like may lead to persecution, under a colonial-era law. Only now have Hong Kongers woken up to their new reality — although the Basic Law technically protects citizens’ rights to speak, rally, march, demonstrate, and go on strike, the government could enfeeble civil rights by bending antiquated laws and legal provisions. The frequent abuse of law enforcement power on a small scale, such as improper arrests and police violence, is desensitizing the public and the international community. In a few years, Hong Kong will become unrecognizable. This is indeed a clever play on Beijing’s part to slowly strip away Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedom, without causing much international attention.

Counter-Strategies Against Beijing’s Brinkmanship

Beijing’s overarching goal is to hollow out Hong Kong but, at the same time, avoid major backlash from the international community, which could spell the end of the privileged global status of Hong Kong not granted to other Chinese cities. Beijing also aims at preventing single incidents that could cascade down into mass protests as seen in 2003, 2014, and 2019; and eliminating any resistance forces from within Hong Kong’s legislature. The tactics outlined above are typical in a game of brinkmanship.

In response, Hong Kongers in Hong Kong and on the so-called “international frontline” must know their strengths and bargaining chips on this negotiating table with Beijing.

Unlike Xinjiang and Tibet, Hong Kong is a city with transparency and free flow of information. Hong Kongers need to make a case to the world that the protests are not acts of terrorism. Some suggestions include comparing the Hong Kong protests to similar struggles in 20 or so other counties in the world at the present time, none of which were classified as terrorism; collecting a large amount of concrete evidence of the disproportionate use of force by the Hong Kong police; and showing how enacting Chinese national laws in Hong Kong will end the city’s autonomy and spell disaster for international community‘s interests.

The Legislative Council is the institution that can counteract Beijing’s “boiling frog” strategy and to keep Hong Kongers’ hope alive in the system. Those who plan to run for legislative office must be prepared to be disqualified from running. If only individuals are banned, there need to be alternative candidates as back-up plans. However, if and when the disqualification process is applied broadly to entire camps of candidates (for example, all who object to Article 23), the pro-democracy camp must make a strong case to the Hong Kong and global public that this is the endgame for Hong Kong democracy. Then the incumbent popularly elected legislators will hold the internationally recognized mandate from the public and serve as the last resistance.

These recommendations delineates how the slogan “if we burn, you burn with us,” often seen in the protests, may play out in the game of international relations. If the national security laws are “passed” by a legislature that is jury-rigged in this manner, or if related national laws are directly implemented in Hong Kong, Hong Kongers should signal clearly to the world that it goes way beyond the promised “one country, two systems.” Crossing this red line by Beijing should be seen by the world as a blunt violation of its promised autonomy to Hong Kongers. At that time, if the international community led by the United States and the United Kingdom decided to revoke the “non-sovereignty entity” status of Hong Kong and regard the SAR as an ordinary Chinese city, it shouldn’t come as a surprise.

Dr. Simon Shen is the Founding Chairman of GLOs (Glocal Learning Offices), an international relations start-up company. He also serves as an adjunct associate professor in the University of Hong Kong, Chinese University of Hong Kong and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, and associate director of the Master of Global Political Economy Programme of the CUHK. The author acknowledges Jean Lin, Coco Ho, Chris Wong, Michelle King, and Alex Yap for their assistance in this piece.

▶️ 高度自治 vs 全面管治
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwt8wZl8jHQ

Top 4 #Facebook ,#Instagram ,#YouTube & #Email #Scams-
1.Duplicating Accounts: One way that scammers trick those on Facebook is to imitate the email template from Facebook and Instagram, which makes it look like you have an official message. Once you enter login information, the phishers can duplicate your account, hold it for ransom, or begin asking your friends for money or information.

2.Viral Videos: Viral videos are huge on social media pages, especially if they are racy, shocking, or scandalous. However, since they are irresistible to most of us, they are also perfect bait for scammers. When you click on one of these videos, you will be asked to update your video player, and, when you do, it downloads and installs a virus onto your system. It also shares the same scam with your friends, who believe the message they receive is safe since it looks like you shared it.
Identity Theft: Facebook accounts can be used to crack other passwords. If your account is duplicated, your information can be used to determine the answers to knowledge-based authentication questions that verify the identity of the account owner. Multi-factor authentication is a good idea to use on all of your accounts.
Give me money, I'll return even more!: After duplicating your friend's account, scammers are using the account to get you to pay them with the promise of returning much more. Your "friend" will tell you that they paid an amount and received a huge return, and recommend you do it too.

3.Burglary: Criminals also use Facebook to determine if a potential victim is at home or not. Publicly sharing information about vacations and other times away is exactly what burglars are looking for.
Free coupons: You have probably seen this many times. You are promised free coupons at large retailers worth more than usual, or coupons for a free vacation. All you need to do is use your Facebook login on a site, and you'll get a free vacation—or your social media identity will belong to someone else without the vacation.
Geo-Stalking: Using the idea of geo-stalking, a criminal can use the GPS technology of social media to stalk and find a target. You should turn off your social media location settings.
Is this you? Lol: This is a scam that has been around for some time. Usually, a link to a video is included with a description from a "friend." The link is normally a virus or browser hijacker.
The "Who Viewed Your Profile?" and "So and so unfriended you!" Scams: If you are active on Facebook, you have probably seen these. Facebook does not advertise these types of activities.

3.Contest Scams: This is another common scam, and it is as simple as setting up a fake page on Facebook, marketing it with a great contest, and collecting information from everyone that joined. One such scam claimed that those who shared the link would get a $1,000 gift card, and more than 40,000 people fell for it.
4.Love scams: The good-looking deployed American serviceman/woman or an alluring lonely foreigner hoping to get to America are common themes used to find unwitting targets. Many people feel alone and become entwined in a social media affair where the person eventually asks for money to get "back to America" or travel there with promises of seeing their "loved one." Once the money is transferred, the distant lover disappears.
5-Money Is Never Quickly Made =use your little brain👍🏾

The Philadelphia 76ers appeared
headed for their first loss of the season. Then Sportsmanship
Award winner Eric Snow was ejected for fighting.

Snow's shoving match with Tracy McGrady and ensuing ejection
sparked the 76ers, who rallied without their point guard for an
87-83 victory over the Orlando Magic.

The Sixers had just one free throw in the first five minutes of
the fourth quarter as the Magic opened a 72-68 lead. With 6:26
left, McGrady went up for a lane jumper and took exception to a
foul by Snow.

McGrady said something to Snow, who responded by putting his
finger in McGrady's chest. McGrady put both hands on Snow's
face and shoved him and both players were ejected.

"I said, `Get out of my face,'" Snow said. "He pushed me in the
face and I walked away clapping and they kicked us both out."

"I don't tough you, you don't touch me," McGrady said. "Don't
put your hands on me. And I retaliated after that. He touched
me and I reached out and that was that."

Snow sneered when his reputation as a hard but clean player was
brought up, while Magic coach Doc Rivers said his player should
have seen it coming.

"Sportsmanship? What's that got to do with anything?" Snow
said. "I didn't initiate it, you know what I'm saying? And I
don't care who you are in this league, you can be the best
samaritan in the world, but if someone pushes you, you got to
defend yourself."

"I try to tell Tracy that he is the target now," Rivers said.
"Guys are going to push and hit him, but if he's struggling
offensively, he can't get frustrated that he lets anybody get
under his skin."

Sixers players and coach Larry Brown argued the ejection of Snow
and center Theo Ratliff drew a technical foul. Orlando guard
Darrell Armstrong made the free throw for a 73-68 lead but the
Magic scored just seven points thereafter.

McGrady's departure hurt the Magic, who had to rely on a hobbled
Grant Hill and struggled to score down the stretch. Meanwhile,
Vernon Maxwell came on for Snow and teamed with fellow guards
Allen Iverson and Aaron McKie to score all of Philadelphia's 19
points in the final six minutes.

"Yeah, it fired us up. We were kind of (ticked) off," McKie
said. "McGrady takes a blow at his face and we get the stiff,
but we're a confident group. We've been in several games like
this throughout last season. You have to expect games like
this. These are the games you like to win."

Iverson scored 29 points and McKie contributed 14, drilling two
big 3-pointers down the stretch. Theo Ratliff added 14 points
and a career-high 17 rebounds for the Sixers (3-0), who won in
Orlando during the regular season for the first time since April
1, 1997, ending a five-game skid.

"These guys (Sixers) have been waiting for the opportunity to do
some big things out on the basketball court," Iverson said.
"They hear everything you write about us not having a shot
because we don't have the talent. But now, a lot of heads are
starting to turn and people recognize there's other guys that
are capable of doing big-time things in this league."