Discovering the truth behind President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis is the responsibility of intellectuals and the media. Six months ago, prosecutors sought to charge Professor Hwan C. Lin, Professor Ho De-fen, and Dr. Dennis Peng with defamation. It was the first time an acting president brought forth a lawsuit against scholars.
For two years, anyone who doubted Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis, or even questioned it, were ridiculed by the media and legally persecuted. But, aren’t government leaders in a democratic society obligated to have the authenticity of their credentials tested? Why does the opposite prevail in Taiwan? Why can a leader who has their credentials questioned forgo providing proof and can, instead, use the judicial system to suppress those that question them?
The hallmark of a dutiful scholar is how willing they are to uphold academic integrity. A desire to authenticate Tsai’s degree is a basic reaction for anyone who considers themselves part of the academic circle. However, after Tsai sought legal action against the three scholars, the public came to understand that “questioning Tsai’s degree will get you sued.” Such a precedent is an affront to academic integrity, and an insult to intellectuals everywhere.
Can Taiwan deem itself a proud democracy if its head of state is allowed to use privilege to elevate themselves their whole life, and then escape criticism when questioned? Can Taiwan say it’s the proud democracy it claims to be when judicial mechanisms are used to enact acts of academic fraud? Martial law has been abolished for decades, and yet this country still operates like a dictatorship. Today is about transitional justice in the academic realm. Transitional justice begins when we can face our mistakes. Here, justice begins when Tsai faces her own academic fraud.
Today’s press conference is about rallying the public to stand up against authoritarianism. We call on Tsai Ing-wen to do her duty as head of state and divulge the truth about her thesis. If she refuses to do so, then the other purpose of today is to reveal the evidence we have found that uncovers that truth.
It’s time the lies ended. We will hold a press conference at the Legislative Yuan tomorrow at 10:30 a.m. Eat News will broadcast the entire event live: https://www.eatnews.co.uk/video/20210909-1/
#DennisPeng #PengWengjen #HwanCLin #HoDefen #TsaiIngwen #LSEThesisGateScandal
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「tsai ing-wen thesis」的推薦目錄:
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 曹長青 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 不禮貌鄉民團 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 [黑特] 英國高等法院:FOIA不適用蔡英文論文- 看板HatePolitics 的評價
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 London School of Economics admits Tsai Ing-wen has no ... 的評價
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 The ThesisGate: An international PhD scandal involving ... 的評價
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 三次串證紀錄全公開! 倒數28天LSE要來陰的了! - Mobile01 的評價
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 NEWS LSE statement on PhD of Dr Tsai Ing-wen - 時事板 的評價
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 ThesisGate of Taiwan Exclusive US Premiere 3 - Pinterest 的評價
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 Tsai Ing-wen thesis、蔡英文、蘇貞昌臉書在PTT/mobile01評價 ... 的評價
- 關於tsai ing-wen thesis 在 Tsai Ing-wen thesis、蔡英文、蘇貞昌臉書在PTT/mobile01評價 ... 的評價
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 曹長青 Facebook 的最讚貼文
知名打假學者石毓智教授指蔡英文是假博士
出生於河南洛陽的石毓智教授是知名學者,他是美國斯坦福大學博士,新加坡國立大學社科院終身教職,先後在中國七所大學擔任教授。他是語言學家。出版過11本中英學術專著。其博客閱覽超過1700萬人。(http://blog.sina.com.cn/shi63)
幾年前,中國所謂『天才少年作家』韓寒被指出造假,其作品(小說/政評/博客等)多是他父親韓仁均(也是作家)代筆。這成為中國近年最大的爭議事件,海內外數百名知識分子參與調查及爭論,大多數認為韓寒造假。更是成千上萬網民博客參與,絕大多數指責韓寒父子欺騙世人。韓寒曾紅極一時,其博客點擊率超過當時美國總統歐巴馬。經過這場『打假』,韓寒不敢再出來發文章和博客(他父親不敢再代筆了),幾近銷聲匿跡。
在這場中國打假事件中,石毓智教授也參與並撰寫了多篇很有分量的質疑文章。因石教授的專業是語言學(他在加大聖地亞哥分校拿到語言學碩士),他從『語言指紋』角度,揭露韓寒父子的文章在語氣、文字、用語習慣上的相同性,指出韓寒文章是他父親代筆。
由於石毓智是語言學家,用『語言指紋』做鑑定(http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4d439bd3010114b7.html),所以他的質疑文章很有說服力。他堅持誠信的價值,堅持打假的正義精神,也得到很多人共鳴。
面對蔡英文的博士學位被質疑事件,石毓智博士曾在其博客發表過『仨洋博士質疑蔡英文學位造假』一文,分析蔡英文公佈其『倫敦政經學院』學歷記錄有造假(詳見:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_63af05000102ypx2.html)。
近日石毓智教授在其新浪博客發文指出:『蔡英文的博士學位造假,是領導者無信;800多萬人投票支持一個學位造假者,是大眾縱容無信。』
下面是石毓智博士的文章:
倫敦政經學院公開否認蔡英文的博士學位
石毓智
斯坦福大學博士
在剛剛過去的這次大選中,蔡英文獲得800多萬選票連任。在第一時間,美日官方就表示了祝賀。然而蔡英文和她的政府最想要的應是英國倫敦政經學院(LSE)的賀電,因為這可以進一步澄清在過去的一年裡一直極度困擾她的『博士門』事件。可是左等右等,至今沒有等來LSE的官方賀電。然而1月15日,LSE的官方網站上則發表了一篇沒有署名的新聞(news),該報道的開頭如下:
Former LSE PhD Law student Dr Tsai Ing-wen was re-elected for a second term as the president of Taiwan on 11 January 2020. Dr Tsai, who will serve for a further four years as president, received a record 8.2 million votes, representing 57 per cent of the votes, with her closest contender receiving 39 per cent.
開頭這五個詞“Former LSE PhD Law student”是字斟句酌出來的,就是公開否認蔡英文是他們大學的博士。這裡有兩個關鍵詞“PhD student”和“former”。按照英美的教育制度,一個人獲得博士要經歷三個階段:PhD student > PhD candidate > PhD。一個學生在註冊為以讀博士為目標的學生那一天算起,就可以稱為“PhD student”,甚至你剛開始修課就可以這樣稱呼。“PhD candidate”是指完成了所有課程要求,只剩下博士論文一項有待完成的學生。“PhD”則是拿到了博士學位者。請看維基百科關於有關術語的解釋:
During the studies that lead to the degree, the student is called a doctoral student or PhD student; a student who has completed all their coursework and comprehensive examinations and is working on their thesis/dissertation is sometimes known as a doctoral candidate or PhD candidate (see: all but dissertation).
另一個關鍵點是,“PhD”是一個資格認證,是不能用時間詞“former”修飾的。比如一個人在牛津大學獲得了博士學位,在任何時候都是說“他是牛津大學博士”,但是不能說“他是前牛津大學博士”。然而“PhD student”則是一種經歷,就可以加上“former”這個時間詞來修飾。
一方面,LSE不給蔡英文發賀電,另一方面在官方網站僅僅稱認蔡英文是他們以前的博士生。這就是公開否認蔡英文一直以來聲稱的在英國倫敦政經學院獲得博士學位的說法。至於新聞稿上用“Dr.”稱呼蔡英文,這在西方是一種禮貌稱謂,相當於“Sr. or Ms”等,任何人都可以自己選擇。比如你買飛機票時,售票員往往會讓你選擇是“Dr.”或者“Sr.”,沒有任何實質性的意義。
子曰:“人而無信,不知其可也。”
子曰:“民無信不立。”
李光耀先生也說過:“一旦縱容不誠信的人掌政,國家就完了!”
蔡英文的博士學位造假,這是領導者的“無信”;800多萬人投票支持一個學位造假者,這是大眾縱容“無信”。這樣的社會如何“立”,又怎能避免“完蛋”的結局,大家可以拭目以待。
2020年1月 18日
——轉自《石毓智博客》:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_63af05000102ytpv.html
——原載《台灣海外網》
http://taiwanus.net/news/press/2020/202001190110121882.htm
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 不禮貌鄉民團 Facebook 的最佳解答
LSE 再次確認蔡英文博士學位
這件事真的還要繼續浪費台灣人時間嗎?
#彭文正依舊不肯認錯
#聯合報留言區一面倒痛批LSE被收買
#裝睡的人叫不醒
==================
TUE 08 OCT 2019
LSE has received a number of queries regarding the academic status of our alumna, Dr Tsai Ing-wen, President of Taiwan.
他們收到很多人對於蔡總統博士學位的關切。
We can be clear the records of LSE and of the University of London - the
degree awarding body at the time - confirm that Dr Tsai was correctly awardeda PhD in Law in 1984.
根據LSE跟倫敦大學的紀錄,確認該學位在1984年授與無誤。
All degrees from that period were awarded via the University of London and
the thesis would have been sent first to their Senate House Library.
當時所有學位由倫敦大學授與,而學位論文必須繳交到Senate House Library。
The Senate House Library records confirm that a copy was received and sent by them to the Institute for Advanced Legal Studies (IALS). There is a listing of Dr Tsai’s thesis ‘Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions’ in the IALS index document “Legal Research in the United Kingdom 1905-1984”, which was published in 1985.
有紀錄確認該圖書館收到了蔡英文的論文,並送到Advanced Legal Studies (IALS)。後來該論文題名也收錄在1985年出版的“Legal Research in the United Kingdom1905-1984"。
Dr Tsai recently provided the LSE Library with a facsimile of a personal copy of the thesis, Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions which is
available to view in the Library Reading Room. We understand Dr Tsai has also provided a digital version of her personal copy to the National Central
Library of Taiwan.
後面就是LSE圖書館可以看到重送的複本,臺灣的國圖也提供數位版。
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的精選貼文
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳解答
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 London School of Economics admits Tsai Ing-wen has no ... 的推薦與評價
Truly speaking, to verify a thesis is just like a piece of cake ! How could it take more than one year for LSE to answer the U.S. reporter ... ... <看更多>
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 The ThesisGate: An international PhD scandal involving ... 的推薦與評價
The ThesisGate scandal is a 36 years long doctorate fraud committed by Ms. Ing-wen Tsai (蔡英文), who is President of the Republic of China on Taiwan. … See ... ... <看更多>
tsai ing-wen thesis 在 [黑特] 英國高等法院:FOIA不適用蔡英文論文- 看板HatePolitics 的推薦與評價