🌻另一個Zoom會議(第二次貼......有補上一些內容)
繼上次的年報導讀會議後, 讓我們再做另一個會議! 這次很榮幸邀請到一位對估值很有見解的股友前輩來帶大家了解估值(恩, 這次我會是主持人, 不是主講人).
主題: 估值(valuation)分享會(Cat: 這不算基礎的估值會議)
主講人: 小揚(from安泰價值投資)
https://www.facebook.com/antaiinvestment (此為小揚的粉絲頁)
參與者: 具基本估值能力. 若打算參加者, 請事先跟我(請私訊)提出一個關於估值的case study, 到時候可在會議中分享(最好是以投影片形式呈現, 這樣到時候好跟大家分享). 若有估值的問題, 也可以提出.
Case study可以是美股, 也可以是台股.
時間: 台灣時間07/10 (周六)晚間9點.
預計一個小時(不會像上次那樣冗長了😅): 前30分鐘由小揚做分享, 後30分鐘大家分享估值案例&提問
進行方式: 以Zoom進行(之後會私訊會議資訊給參與者)
🌻Morgan Stanley Mid-year Investor Outlook: A tricky transition
https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/midyear-2021-global-markets-outlook
🌻在您投資生涯中, 有沒有一些觀念讓您受用很多?
下面這位投資名人的好觀念影響我很深. 他的意思是, 一般投資人, 只要能説出三個買一家公司的理由, 就很夠了. 這也迫使我, 每次在買股票時, 問自己對這家公司的了解有多少. 也會去衡量公司的優點與缺點在哪裡.
"It is vital (重要的) that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks."
全文在此:
Jim Cramer: In Times Like This, Go for the Easy Money
Look at the stocks you own. Can you tell me why you've got them? If you can't answer the following three questions, then have a look at several I like right now.
We've endured the meme stock craziness, with all of its love for heavily shorted stocks. We have watched the collapse of bitcoin to levels viewed as shocking, even if they are still more than double where they were not that long ago. We've dealt with Fed officials making it clear that they are no longer on the side of the bulls or the bears. They are on the side of job growth, but are wary of inflation. We've seen the end of the rush to get vaccines, which means that millions of people are going to get the new COVID variant, because there is no natural immunity to it. We've watched as the hopes for an infrastructure bill have collapsed. We've endured shortages of everything from chips to plastic to imported goods and labor.
And we're still standing, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yep, we are in one of those halcyon moments, where the masks are off -- even if they shouldn't be -- and Americans are back doing what they do best: consume, spend, go out to eat and then consume and spend some more.
There are times in the stock market where the collective mindset is revealed. This is one of those times: Things are cool, it's not a big moment, there's no real news for a bit, it's the historically strong period and we can reach some conclusions about where we are.
When things are like this, it is important to remember that buyers like to revert to tried-and-true companies that thrive no matter what. These are companies that have an edge and are better at what they do than other companies.
You know that I am a great believer in index funds, that the average person doesn't have the time or the inclination to research individual stocks. It's a difficult barrier. I think you need to make time to read the quarterly report and listen to the conference call, to Google articles and, if possible, get some research about the companies you own. It is vital that you know what you own, that if I asked you on the street why you like a certain stock, you can give me three reasons. If you don't know how they make their money, who their key clients are and what they make if, then I will tell you that you are over your head and should not own individual stocks. I am reminded by this, because, once again, without a mask, I can be recognized and if I am not holding "Nvidia the Second," I can carry on a conversation.
I have had many in the last two weeks and when I have asked this litany of questions, I find myself at a loss as to why almost no one knew what they owned. But they thirsted for individual stocks, because they, like me, think things are better post pandemic. No, that's not a facetious comment. Many, many stocks did better with a stay-at-home economy. A huge number.
So what do I do? I revert to what others do when you are stumped about how to stay in touch with stocks, but want to do less homework. That means buying stocks that are accessible, not stocks like Unity (U) or Snowflake (SNOW) or Twilio (TWLO) or Okta (OKTA) .
I revert to normal businesses people know and I suggest they Google some articles, peruse the conference call, but, above all, like the company's products so you can buy more if it goes down.
Here's some that I have been telling people I like:
First is Ford (F) . I think the Ford lineup is amazing. The electric F-150 series will be incredible. I am eager to get a Maverick for my family, because it is a smaller pickup that will get the job done for the myriad little things I need to do with this farm I bought from that crazy bitcoin foray. I like the competitive edge of the CEO, who says he is going to bury Elon Musk when the Lightning comes out. I even think the Bronco is cool as all get out. Most important, though? I think the chip shortage is ending. My semiconductor friends are telling me the foundries are producing more feature-rich chips and that means Ford can pump out the trucks small business people love and need. Plus, the used car prices at last have plateaued, according to their most important pricing index. Halcyon times.
Second, Costco (COST) : The samples are coming back. Tell me you don't love the samples. You need things in bulk. You want low prices. You want to get all of the things that people don't think of with Costco, like insurance, hearing-aids -- hey, they are a fortune -- jewelry, things around the house. You go and you will buy far more than you first came for. My kind of store.
The kids love this American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) , which we just bought for my charitable trust, which you can follow along by joining the Action Alerts PLUS club. Jay Schottenstein, the CEO, came on "Mad Money" recently and it's clear that his Aerie model has real staying power: 26 consecutive quarters of double digit growth. No flash in the pan, that one. Number one brand in jeans for the 15 to 25 year old group. The best in the mall. How did I know this? I see the credit card bills.
I got up this morning to do my physical therapy. I have been doing it ever since I hurt my back in February. I have this really cool pair of sneakers that fit me perfectly and I love them, but I am fortunate enough to have a vacation house and I am always taking those shoes with me.
So I went on Amazon (AMZN) this morning and lo and behold I saw them for half price. I bought two pairs. Then I went over everything I have bought in the last year and got a bunch of those things. Then I bought a pair of binoculars, because mine were stolen. I paid half price.
Yep, Amazon's universal. I was talking to Alexa, while I was ordering, getting some new music on, asking questions. I saw that despite all of the Sturm und Drang of Amazon being late with things, all the delivery dates were within range. I didn't click on any ads, and I didn't need the speed of Web Services, but the whole thing reminded me about how special the darned company is. I don't care if it's ahead or behind plan for the moment. I would just buy some more when it goes down.
Finally, Apple (AAPL) . I think people who don't own Apple should look what they are holding at this very moment. Yes, right now. Or look at what's in your lap or on the table besides your fork. And then think about the bill you paid last night without knowing it. Think about what you bought in the App store yesterday. Think about what would happen if it would break or get stolen or, left in the Uber (UBER) , or heaven forbid, be dropped into the pool or in the, yes, toilet.
There, that's what you buy in halcyon times. Stocks of companies you know that if they go lower, because things get less halcyon, you are fine with it and buy more. If things go up, believe me, you will participate.
So accept the moment. Don't try for the hard money. Go for the easy kind. That's the best kind.
https://realmoney.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/jim-cramer--15692051
Picture: 牡丹(peony)花開. 恨不得院子裡有一塊地是牡丹園.
同時也有29部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過44萬的網紅Composite,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Original Music:...
「we are number one meme」的推薦目錄:
- 關於we are number one meme 在 貓的成長美股異想世界 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Mʀ.Mᴀʀᴋᴇʀ. 麥克筆先生 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Aisaka Miharu Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Composite Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Composite Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Composite Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Lazy Town | We are Number One Music Video Videos For Kids 的評價
- 關於we are number one meme 在 We Are Number One but it's a Remix Compilation of Memes 的評價
- 關於we are number one meme 在 We Are Number One but it's woahed by Crash Bandicoot 的評價
- 關於we are number one meme 在 "We are number one" is the Meme of the year thanks to you all! 的評價
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Lazy Town - We Are Number One [DANK EDITION] - YouTube 的評價
- 關於we are number one meme 在 33 We are number one ideas - Pinterest 的評價
- 關於we are number one meme 在 Star - gists · GitHub 的評價
- 關於we are number one meme 在 We are number one! - OverMeme - Overwatch Memes 的評價
we are number one meme 在 Mʀ.Mᴀʀᴋᴇʀ. 麥克筆先生 Facebook 的最讚貼文
幹你2018
-
這位名叫斯特凡·卡爾·史蒂芬森的不凡男演員
出生於1975年7月的冰島哈夫納夫約杜爾
在早期生涯中,他還擔任過電視的木偶操作員及就讀冰島戲劇學院
-
畢業後的斯特凡除了接拍一些戲劇外
在偶然下也結識了冰島體操運動員皆製作人Magnús Scheving
Magnús當初因為擔心冰島的新一代缺乏足夠的體育鍛煉
因此他決定創造使冰島的小孩觀看更健康的兒童教育節目
這部兒童教育節目的名稱就叫做:「LazyTown(懶人小鎮)」
是一部改編自童書的教育音樂喜劇
劇情圍繞在小鎮上的騷女Stephanie,與鎮上的超級英雄Sportacus
一同阻止滿腦子想讓小鎮更懶惰但每次都失敗的主要反派Robbie的主軸故事
當Magnú在構思Robbie的角色人選時,就邀請了斯特凡擔任這個角色
談合作成功之後斯特凡也正式加入劇組,在04年至14年內成為節目中的靈魂角色
懶人小鎮日後也獲得了成功與更多迴響,甚至在全球一百多個國家間播出
節目播畢後斯特凡也隨著妻子和孩子搬到洛杉磯生活
悲劇的是,斯特凡在2016年9月下旬被診斷患有膽管癌
而懶人小鎮的首席作家Mark Valenti在得知斯特凡的壞消息後
決定透過GoFundMe創建了大眾籌集活動,以便斯特凡的病情無法負擔醫藥費
-
同時,當網路上的人發現到這個籌集活動時
許多YouTube用戶也接連上傳惡搞或模仿懶人小鎮的MEME作品
導致節目裡由斯特凡親自演唱的兩首反派歌曲
「We Are Number One 」和「You Are A Pirate 」在熱潮下接連爆紅
最後不但籌集活動的籌金也成功達到目標,還使得Robbie這個角色
日後成為2016年最熱門ㄎㄧㄤ爆的年度最佳MEME
但正當大家認為斯特凡現在應該還在努力治療癌症時
斯特凡已經在今年8月21日因癌症未期而去世
也代表一個時代又再一次落幕
#另外好消息是紀念斯特凡的表演藝術中心將在明年瑞士啟用
#事實證明2018是最爛一年 #Stephanie我婆
#留言收斯特凡的經典歌曲 #F
we are number one meme 在 Aisaka Miharu Facebook 的精選貼文
"Nahaz may die soon and we should respect our elders"
LOL
I recently wrote a small bit about TI invites & invitations in general based on a comment that some invites were determined because of nepotism. Here's my response
That's not how any of this works
First of all, the talent invites for TI every year are decided by Valve themselves and doesn't have much outside influence. I don't know but I would guess it's decided by committee or 2 or 3 people rather than one guy. Valve decides (just like every other tournament organizer out there) what kind of show they want to put on before deciding what talent to invite. You don't invite Redeye first and decide you want a professional, well-executed show later. First you decide for a premier event like this you want everything looking & sounding professional (but still fun) rather than a more laid-back & casual show like The Summit or Seatstory Cup. Redeye will be the first to tell you that organizers are hesitant to hire him for an event like that because he's so good at being the pro and they can't imagine him in a much more relaxed environment. This proves you can be perfectly capable talent but not be invited because you don't fit the organizers vision.
So, now that you've decided what kind of show you want to have, this will usually decide (as well as the budget) how many slots you have for talent. A limited number of slots at the biggest tournament of the year means you have the tough task of picking and choosing which talent fit your vision for the event. Some invites are obvious, like Merlini, Tobi and Redeye due to their long-term established talent and fanbases within the scene. You don't have a CS:GO Major without Anders & Semmler because they're fucking Anders & Semmler. Others farther down the line are going to be endlessly compared to other, equally suitable talents and you have to decide which one of them fits your event the best. You may have a personal taste for the ex-professional players on the panel and enjoy the in-depth analysis they give but that doesn't mean as a showrunner you fill up the panel w/ all hardcore analysts. I believe a good example was the TI5 panel was (from my perspective) rather stale & boring despite having great analysis. Part of the reason is that you have to consider synergy & who works best with others. For example, at the Frankfurt Major, Maelk was invited because he had good synergy with Paul and served as a catalyst & punching bag for flames to make the panel more fun & loose. Maelk serves as an excellent heel because he's likeable enough but still comes off as arrogant w/ unshakeable confidence so you can make fun of him without feeling bad. Does this mean that Maelk was more deserving of an invite over Godz? Absolutely not, Godz deserved it 10x more than Maelk, but Maelk fit the vision of the desk better for the showrunner.
So in this case, where's Fogged? Where's Nahaz? Again, I don't know exactly, but I'm going to guess he/they didn't fit the vision of the show despite being perfectly qualified. Charlie is naturally more of an entertainer than most with his elaborate flames & can serve as a catalyst for banter back and forth. Shane understand Dota at a better level than your average viewer but is endlessly finding ways to make things fun & loose. Pyrion's insanely personable & has an excellent sense of wit. Black has more experience with all the regions of Dota and probably has personal stories about many players. Slacks is a creative madman & sold his soul for an innovative sense of humor with a drive to create more content this year than any other personality in the scene. Godz is an excellent analyst who's able to break down the vast amounts of information to the most important points to the audience. Purge has a dryer sense of humor than anybody there and is mindful & articulate in explaing Dota's fundamental concepts. I got carried by Blitz, etc, etc. The point is, if you try to actually think outside of your own point of view & preferences and evaluate the various talents of the scene, you can see that there's a potential reason to invite almost every person people listed in this thread depending on what kind of show you envision.
While personalities can be flexibile & well-versed in covering multiple roles or moods in a show, every talent brings something unique. Nobody can be a better Blitz co-caster to me than Blitz. Nobody can beat Redeye on being the Redeye professional host & meme maker. Nobody can beat Charlie at being Charlie (see: Asshole). That doesn't mean I wouldn't be hyped to cocast with Fogged. That doesn't mean Chobra couldn't take Redeye's spot and make this event amazing.
This also doesn't mean that there aren't people out there who deserve it more than the people being invited. Durka, Llama, Lyrical, to name a few, all deserve it based on the purely on the hardwork of grinding more games out than almost anybody on this list. Fogged deserves it because of his genuine personality & knowledge of the game and its scene. Nahaz deserves it because he may die soon & we should respect our elders. Unfortunately those people didn't make it and that sucks. That doesn't take away from their talents or hardwork nor does mean that undermine who did make it by saying nepotism determines invitations.
we are number one meme 在 Composite Youtube 的最佳解答
Original Music:
we are number one meme 在 Composite Youtube 的精選貼文
Original Music: Bastille - Pompeii
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This video was made for entertainment purposes, and is transformative in nature.
we are number one meme 在 Composite Youtube 的最佳解答
Original Music: Mariah Carey - All I Want For Christmas Is You
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. This video was made for entertainment purposes, and is transformative in nature.
we are number one meme 在 We Are Number One but it's a Remix Compilation of Memes 的推薦與評價
Check This Channel Out ➜ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJM0Qgkpr_x7pIugR8xccSgWe Are Number One but it's full of memes! ... <看更多>
we are number one meme 在 We Are Number One but it's woahed by Crash Bandicoot 的推薦與評價
We Are Number One but it's woahed by Crash Bandicoot. 31,731,945 views • Jul 30, 2017 • Please consider donating to Robbie Rotten's gofund ... ... <看更多>
we are number one meme 在 Lazy Town | We are Number One Music Video Videos For Kids 的推薦與評價
Lazy Town - New Videos!: http://bit.ly/2pomR9pSing along to the Songs of Lazy Town!Subscribe to the Lazy Town YouTube channel: ... ... <看更多>