關於 whether 文法 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

透過翻譯，我們依然能在百年後收到濟慈的浪漫
這封寫給愛人的信，你最喜歡哪句呢？
來讀 Sonny老師的翻譯&教學札記 老師的美麗翻譯

以下為 Sonny 老師第一視角文字

-

今天讀了幾封英國詩人的情書
想跟大家分享一段邊讀邊驚嘆的
是濟慈 (John Keats) 1819 年
在英格蘭背山面海的窗前
寫給情人芬妮的情書

附上我的中文翻譯
來和大家一起欣賞：

Ask yourself my love whether you are not very cruel to have so entrammelled me, so destroyed my freedom.
我的愛人哪，請妳問問自己，讓我如此魂牽夢縈、從此失去自由，是否太過殘忍？

For myself I know not how to express my devotion to so fair a form: I want a brighter word than bright, a fairer word than fair.
因我無法用言語形容如此美麗的存在：我想找個比鮮豔還更鮮豔，比美麗還更美麗的形容詞。

I almost wish we were butterflies and liv'd but three summer days—
我曾空想我倆是一對蝴蝶，只能共度三個夏日——

three such days with you I could fill with more delight than fifty common years could ever contain.
與你共度的三天，我心中的喜悅，勝過五十個春夏秋冬。

在沒有網路和視訊的時代
情人間只能倚靠書信往來
文字也成為感情的載體
穿越時間空間
維繫一顆顆思念的心

文法、句型、技巧固然重要
但能反映出真摯情感的寫作
才能打動人心

-

今年最後一期
【台灣浩進階筆譯班】名額只剩一個啦 🔥
結合往年爆滿的 #翻譯所考試班 ＋ #基礎筆譯班
全新 10 週課綱，帶你完勝不同語境
僅此一班，就缺你一人：https://lihi1.cc/xam1M

有未跟上的同學也別難過
若對「旁聽班」名額有意願（無法參與討論和作業點評）
可以留言讓我們知道喔！

🖐🏽 五分鐘，Ken帶您看懂BBC報導

🎁 第二波抽書活動：
底下👍點讚 + 🔗分享 + ✏留言
告訴Ken你想要哪一本書
(圖片詳見上一則)

🎊 第一波中獎學員: 蔡馥如

📰 Why self-promotion doesn't have to be taboo?

🀄 為什麼自我推銷不必忌諱?

Many of us instinctively hate the idea of blowing our own trumpets. Yet it's important to understand how best to highlight our skills – especially now.

📌 第一段說明，我們許多人instinctively(本能地)討厭blowing our trumpets (自我吹捧)。然而，在這時代，要了解如何顯示我們的才能是很重要的。

The mere idea of self-promotion makes many people wince. Trumpet-blowing is something a lot of us aren’t good at and that’s no surprise, given we’re taught as children that ‘boasting’ isn’t an attractive quality. “We get hung up on self-promotion coming across as arrogant,” explains Stefanie Sword-Williams, author of F*ck Being Humble: Why Self Promotion Isn’t a Dirty Word. “But if you’re not an arrogant person, you won’t deliver it in that way.”

📌 本段說明，自我推銷的想法使許多人wince (畏縮)。Trumpet-blowing (自我吹捧) 是我們很多人都不擅長的事，其實不奇怪。因為我們從小就被教導說 boasting (吹牛) 並不是一種吸引人的特質。 《X你的謙虛》作者威廉史瓦特就說：「為什麼 self-promotion (自我推銷) 不是一個不好的詞? 但是，如果您不是一個 arrogant (自大的)人，您不會讓人有那樣的感覺。」

In fact, taking pride in your professional accomplishments should be considered a normal part of life, not a taboo, experts say. Highlighting your skills well can feed into workplace success, and whether you’re changing jobs, want to move up at work or show your boss what you’ve been achieving, being able to self-promote effectively is an advantage.

📌 本段說明，專家表示，實際上，以自己的專業 accomplishments (成就) 為榮，應該被視為生活的正常部分，而不是taboo (禁忌)。出色地展示自己的技能可以促進工作場所的成功，無論您是要換工作，想升職還是向老闆展示您所取得的成就，能夠effectively (有效)自我推銷都是一個優勢。

Right now, the need to ‘self-sell’ has arguably never been greater, as pandemic-hit businesses weigh up what they do – and don’t – need going forward. It’s particularly true for some groups; women, who traditionally struggle to promote themselves, have been particularly affected by the Covid-19 recession, for example. Home workers could also benefit; research shows that they suffer from a lack of face-to-face time with managers, which negatively impacts career progression.

📌 這段說到：目前，可以說“自售” 的需求從未如此強大，因為受到疫情打擊的企業weigh up (權衡)了他們要做的事情和不需要做的事情。對於某些群體來說尤其如此；例如，傳統上為提升自我而 struggle (奮鬥)的女性尤其受到 Covid-19 衰退的影響。家庭工人也可以受益；研究表明，他們缺乏與經理面對面的時間，這會對職業發展產生負面影響。

“If we don’t invest the time in demonstrating our value, we run the risk of not being considered as ‘needed’,” explains Sword-Williams. “The content you put out about yourself is what you will be known for – so it’s essential that you control that narrative.”

📌 Sword-Williams 解釋說：“如果我們不花時間 demonstrate(證明) 自己的價值，那麼我們就有被認為不是'需要'的 risk (風險)。” “發布給自己的內容就是您將廣為人知的內容—因此，控制該 narrative (敘述)至關重要。”

Post-pandemic, how we promote ourselves could help determine whether we thrive in the workplace or linger, overlooked, on the side lines. That means overcoming squeamishness and learning how to explain our skillset properly. Fortunately, it’s something we can all master.

📌 疫情發生之後，我們如何推銷自己可以幫助確定我們在工作場所 thrive (茁壯成長)，或是在職場上 linger (徘徊)被忽視。這意味著要克服 squeamishness (神經質)，學習如何正確地解釋我們的技能。幸運的是，這是我們所有人都能掌握的東西。

In its simplest form, self-promotion is the act of drawing attention to your work and achievements. Whether it’s a post shared on your LinkedIn, an email check-in with your boss or a conversation with an important contact, self-promotion shines a spotlight on your successes with a view to developing a personal brand, furthering a career or asserting yourself in your field. It’s a skill that’s as important for someone trying to get on the employment ladder as it is for a CEO.

📌 在最簡單的形式中，自我推銷是一種引起對您的工作和成就的關注的行為。無論是在LinkedIn上分享貼文，與老闆的電子郵件，還是與重要聯繫人對話，自我推銷都將 spotlight (聚焦) 於您的成功，以發展個人品牌，促進事業或在自己領域建立聲譽。對於想get on the employment (升職)的人來說，這項技能與對於首席執行官的一樣重要。

全文: https://reurl.cc/OX61jv

📓【Ken的文法筆記 I】
🟠翻譯 X 詳解 已上傳資料庫🟣
購買請至➜ https://is.gd/5Kp6M0

📘【Ken的高頻單字筆記 I】
購買請至➜ https://is.gd/zdxeF0

👨‍🏫【實用英語扎根培訓】
購買請至➜ https://reurl.cc/m95QDl

（轉）

【有關司法機構被官營媒體攻擊的聲明】

《人民日報》於2020年12月27日發表一篇抨擊香港法院在一宗涉及知名人士的案件中批准被告人保釋的評論文章，而文章發表的時候該獲准保釋的決定已進入上訴程序，我們就此表示嚴重關注。文章攻擊法院的判決，並形容《蘋果日報》創辦人黎智英「惡名昭彰，極度危險」，以及是「亂港禍首」。該報斷言在黎智英案中，不准保釋須是前設的常規，並要求司法機構「作出正確選擇」。文章又認為已經有足夠證據顯示黎智英已觸犯國安法第55條，該條訂明某些案件可以移交中國大陸審訊。當上訴委員會將於2020年12月31日就政府申請上訴許可召開聆訊，由國家政權控制和營運的報章刊登該篇評論文章，令人尤其擔心及被視為是試圖干預我們獨立的司法機關的程序公義。

作為致力守護長久以來珍而重之的法治和司法獨立的法律執業者，我們認為有責任提出以下關注，並以個人名義僅此聲明：

1、 官營媒體對司法機關毫無基礎的攻擊應當停止

在數位親建制人士及官方控制和營運的媒體 － 包括《文匯報》及《大公報》－ 要求「司法改革」及嘲諷「黃官」的日益壓力下，出現上述評論文章，我們深表憂慮。我們注意到司法機構自今年9月以來，已就對其日趨激烈的攻擊發表了四份聲明。

誠然，公眾有權討論及評論法院的裁決及其根據的事實及法律，惟討論不應流於憑空論斷、政治抹黑，或企圖向法院就某些案件的裁決施加壓力，否則公眾對司法機構的聲譽、專業和獨立勢必受到嚴重破壞。特別是《人民日報》刊登的評論文章，會被視為明顯地向法院將要審理的案件施加壓力，此舉可以是違反審理中的案件不應評論的原則，以及有損公平審訊。這些攻擊應當立即停止。

我們亦呼籲律政司採取行動，維護司法機構免受官方控制或營運的媒體作出毫無基礎和不實指控。正如高浩文法官在其判詞中指出，「在普通法司法管轄區，例如香港，傳統上法官和司法機構是不會公開地就針對其裁決和個人而作出的不公平和不適當的批評為自己辯護，而傳統上負責律政的官員則有責任反駁錯誤的指控，以維護司法機構和個別法官。」

2、 公平審訊及無罪假定

不論如何解讀，香港特區政府有法律責任保護每一位香港居民的基本權利不受侵犯，包括公平審訊的權利。我們質疑一旦涉嫌觸犯國安法第55條下，該等權利是否仍然受到保障。理由有兩方面：第一，我們質疑中國大陸在刑事審訊的程序中，對公平審訊是否有足夠的保障，那是由於中國尚未落實《公民與政治權利國際公約》，這亦是長久以來為人詬病。第二，12名香港居民於2020年12月28日在深圳鹽田法院受審的案件，沒有公開審訊，他們亦沒有權選擇他們委託的法律代表，令人質疑香港特區政府有否履行其法律責任。

上述關注，反映國安法無法為被告人提供足夠的基本人權保障，並在法律上存在很多不確定性。正如英國最高法院院長賓漢（Lord Bingham）在其著作《The Rule of Law》中說明，法治的核心是在一個地方裡，所有不論屬公共或私人的個人和機構，都必須受法律的約束及保障，而法律必須是公開和預先頒佈，以及由法院公開執行。因此，我們促請有關當局嚴格遵守法治原則，自我約束，以及謹慎運用國安法賦予的權力。

帝理邁
林洋鋐
彭皓昕
蔡頴德
黃耀初

2020年12月30日


【Statement on Continuous Attacks on the Judiciary and
Art. 55 of the National Security Law】

We note with grave concern that on 27 December 2020, l the People’s Daily published anr editorial piece criticizing a decision in respect of a bail application that is currently subject to an ongoing appeal. In attacking the judicial decisions in Apple Daily founder, Mr Jimmy Lai Chee-yin’s case, the People’s Daily has labelled him as a “notorious and extremely dangerous” and an “insurgent”. It added that the presumption against bail should be the norm in cases such as Lai’s and urged the judiciary to “make the right decision”. The commentary further claimed that there were sufficient grounds in Mr Lai’s case for invoking Article 55 of the National Security Law (NSL) - which allows certain cases to be transferred to Mainland China for trial. This type of commentary appearing in a newspaper run/controlled by the Central Government, when the Appeals Committee would soon be hearing the Hong Kong Government’s application for leave to appeal on 31 December 2020, is particularly worrying and borders on an attempt to interfere with the due administration of justice by Hong Kong’s independent judiciary.

We, the undersigned, in our personal capacity and as lawyers committed to safeguarding the Rule of Law and the independence of judiciary, we feel duty bound to draw attention to the following matters:

(1) Unfounded attacks against the judiciary by state-run/controlled media should cease

The above-mentioned commentary was made amid intensifying calls for “judicial reform” and deriding “yellow judges” from various pro-establishment figures and state-run/controlled media, including Wen Wei Po and Tai Kung Po. To that end, we note that the judiciary has had to issue a total of four statements since September this year, in light of the intensifying attacks mounted against it.

Whilst members of the public have the right to discuss and comment on court rulings for reasons grounded on fact or law, such discussion should not cross into bare assertions, imputations of political bias, or attempts to put pressure on the Judiciary to decide specific cases in a particular manner. Otherwise, public confidence in the integrity, professionalism and independence of the judiciary would be seriously undermined. Notably, the commentary published by People’s Daily, could be perceived as putting pressure on the judiciary to decide a pending case in a particular manner, which breaches the sub judice rule and could prejudice the accused’s right to a fair trial. These attacks should cease immediately.

We also call on the Secretary of Justice to take action to defend the Judiciary against unwarranted accusations led by state-run/controlled media. As Judge Russell Coleman noted in his judgment, “it has been the traditional view that Judges and the Judiciary do not speak out in defence of their decisions or to defend themselves against unfair and inappropriate criticism [...] in common law jurisdictions like Hong Kong, it was the tradition that the minister responsible for the administration of justice has the duty of defending the Judiciary or individual Judges against wrong accusations”.

(2) Concerns about fair trial and presumption of innocence

The Hong Kong Government has the legal obligation to protect any Hong Kong residents, whose rendition is sought, from violation of his/her fundamental and non-derogable rights, including the right to fair trial. We question whether such rights can be guaranteed upon invoking of Article 55 of the NSL. The reason is two-folded. First, we question whether China has adequate protection on the right to fair trial during the criminal process, as mainland China has not ratified the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and has been long criticised on such. Second, the fact that the 12 Hong Kong residents who stood trial at Shenzhen Yantian People’s Court on 28 December 2020 were denied the right to open trial and the right to appoint lawyers of their choice, casts considerable doubt on whether the Hong Kong Government can fulfil its legal obligation.

These concerns reflect that the NSL lacks adequate protections to safeguard an accused’s fundamental human rights and lacks legal certainty. As Lord Bingham wrote in his book, The Rule of Law, at the core of the rule of law is the notion “that all persons and authorities within the state, whether public or private, should be bound by and entitled to the benefit of laws publicly and prospectively promulgated and publicly administered in the courts”. Accordingly, we urge the authorities to uphold strict adherence to the rule of law and exercise restraint and caution in invoking its power under the NSL.
Mark Daly
Michelle Tsoi Wing Tak
Kenneth Lam
Davyd Wong
Janet Pang Ho Yan

Dated this 30 December 2020

賓狗的更多英文學習資源：https://www.zeczec.com/projects/bingobilingual
· 全英文 podcast
· 視訊家教
· 線上課程：發音教學、文法解析

1【clinical trial 臨床試驗】— 名詞
Before the clinical trials end, we can’t be sure whether a vaccine is truly safe and effective.

2 【feminist 女性主義者】— 名詞（支持女性擁有平等權力）
Feminist protests across Mexico have turned increasingly violent.

3【coup 重大成就】— 名詞（p 不發音）
The truce will be a major diplomatic coup for Russia if it lasts long.

EP118
EP131

4【mortality 人終將一死】— 名詞
Generation Z knows fear and mortality.

5 【wind turbine 風力發電機】— 名詞
With one blade painted black, wind turbines can be bird-friendly.

簡單複習：
1）clinical trial 臨床試驗
2）feminist 女性主義者
3）coup 重大成就
4）mortality 人終將一死
5）wind turbine 風力發電機

podcast 跟 IG 也有日更喔，各大平台搜尋「賓狗」就可以找到了！

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
【Try IT 視聴者必見】
★参加者満足度98.6％！無料の「中学生・高校生対象オンラインセミナー」受付中！
「いま取り組むべき受験勉強法」や「効率的に点数を上げるテスト勉強の仕方」、「モチベーションの上げ方」まで、超・実践的な学習法をあなたに徹底解説します！
今月・来月のセミナー内容や日程は、トライさん公式LINEからご確認いただけます。
↓↓友だち登録はこちらから↓↓
https://liny.link/r/1655096723-1GOJPwzq?lp=gcZxVv
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

この映像授業では「【高校　英語】　名詞節を導く if/whether」が約6分で学べます。身につけたいポイントは「if が「～かどうか」の意味になるのは一般動詞のあとだけ！」です。映像授業は、【はじめに】⇒【今回のポイント】⇒【今回のまとめ】の順に見てください。


この授業以外でもわからない単元があれば、下記のURLをクリックしてください。
各単元の映像授業をまとまって視聴することができます。


■「高校英文法」でわからないことがある人はこちら！
高校英文法　時制
https://goo.gl/k1ehYb

高校英文法　受動態
https://goo.gl/mwIc70

高校英文法　助動詞
https://goo.gl/TovEfF

高校英文法　不定詞
https://goo.gl/8hxojj

高校英文法　動名詞
https://goo.gl/jufF4e

高校英文法　分詞
https://goo.gl/J5Yz5e

高校英文法　仮定法
https://goo.gl/B34gbI

高校英文法　比較
https://goo.gl/dyjZL8

高校英文法　関係詞
https://goo.gl/86IuHk

高校英文法　接続詞
https://goo.gl/mG3fXp

高校英文法　動詞
https://goo.gl/VGWuXR

高校英文法　名詞・冠詞
https://goo.gl/EdWYDJ

高校英文法　代名詞
https://goo.gl/41H9sP

高校英文法　前置詞
https://goo.gl/4HCu4O

高校英文法　形容詞・副詞
https://goo.gl/MK3m3k

高校英文法　５文型
https://goo.gl/yn5jjj

高校英文法　強調・倒置・挿入・省略・同格
https://goo.gl/1ZdExp

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
【Try IT 視聴者必見】
★参加者満足度98.6％！無料の「中学生・高校生対象オンラインセミナー」受付中！
「いま取り組むべき受験勉強法」や「効率的に点数を上げるテスト勉強の仕方」、「モチベーションの上げ方」まで、超・実践的な学習法をあなたに徹底解説します！
今月・来月のセミナー内容や日程は、トライさん公式LINEからご確認いただけます。
↓↓友だち登録はこちらから↓↓
https://liny.link/r/1655096723-1GOJPwzq?lp=gcZxVv
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

この映像授業では「【高校　英語】　形式主語 it の慣用表現」が約8分で学べます。身につけたいポイントは「It costs ～ to V　「～（費用）がかかる」　など」です。映像授業は、【はじめに】⇒【今回のポイント】⇒【今回のまとめ】の順に見てください。


この授業以外でもわからない単元があれば、下記のURLをクリックしてください。
各単元の映像授業をまとまって視聴することができます。


■「高校英文法」でわからないことがある人はこちら！
高校英文法　時制
https://goo.gl/k1ehYb

高校英文法　受動態
https://goo.gl/mwIc70

高校英文法　助動詞
https://goo.gl/TovEfF

高校英文法　不定詞
https://goo.gl/8hxojj

高校英文法　動名詞
https://goo.gl/jufF4e

高校英文法　分詞
https://goo.gl/J5Yz5e

高校英文法　仮定法
https://goo.gl/B34gbI

高校英文法　比較
https://goo.gl/dyjZL8

高校英文法　関係詞
https://goo.gl/86IuHk

高校英文法　接続詞
https://goo.gl/mG3fXp

高校英文法　動詞
https://goo.gl/VGWuXR

高校英文法　名詞・冠詞
https://goo.gl/EdWYDJ

高校英文法　代名詞
https://goo.gl/41H9sP

高校英文法　前置詞
https://goo.gl/4HCu4O

高校英文法　形容詞・副詞
https://goo.gl/MK3m3k

高校英文法　５文型
https://goo.gl/yn5jjj

高校英文法　強調・倒置・挿入・省略・同格
https://goo.gl/1ZdExp