關於 may用法 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

Andy的外籍部屬向他提出申請，希望能調整上班時間，部屬問：＂May I change working hours, so I can miss the traffic both ways?＂ Andy心想，想念交通，這是什麼理由啊！還懷疑自己是不是聽錯...⬇️⬇️⬇️

[LO BI CAFÉ 陋皕咖啡工作室]
#高雄美食 #高雄苓雅 #高雄咖啡工作室 ☕️
🔻肉桂捲捲 $90元
🔻法式滑嫩布丁 $80元
🔻香草蘭姆酒可麗露 $70元
🎉鳳梨酥咖啡中秋禮盒 $759元
/
這次分享位在苓雅區的 #陋皕咖啡工作室 ✨
位在巷子裡面一不小心就會錯過
內用環境充滿溫馨的居家感
座位不多但是空間很舒適
如果想聊天或和咖啡師討論咖啡知識
也可以坐在後區的吧台位子～
#肉桂捲捲 ✨
平時不敢吃肉桂捲的我第一次嘗試
意外的可以接受還覺得很好吃！
肉桂捲本身不大口感比較紮實一點
還有淡淡的焦香味朋友也都很喜歡
#滑嫩法式手工布丁 ✨
手工布丁還不錯 吃起來滑嫩～
選用法國進口鮮奶油與新鮮鮮奶
調配出最佳比例香味濃郁還有淡淡的香草風味
#香草蘭姆酒可麗露 ✨
加入嚴選的巴拿馬老爺12年萊姆酒
內餡吃起來偏軟帶有淡淡的焦糖果香

✨鳳梨酥咖啡中秋禮盒 🎑✨
今年主打的「咖啡品嚐禮盒」🎉
讓你在眾多的月餅禮盒中有不同的選擇
內含淺焙耳掛咖啡5入、土鳳梨酥4入
還有濾泡式咖啡包5入
使用衣索比亞🇪🇹耶加雪菲 金雷納安巴亞
瓜地馬拉🇬🇹微微特南果 的水洗咖啡豆
除了掛耳咖啡比較特別的是濾泡式咖啡！
可以冷泡放入瓶中就有好喝的咖啡了
手工製作的鳳梨酥吃起來口感酥鬆
滿滿的鳳梨香氣搭配特製的糖蜜
達成酸甜平衡的風味很好吃👍

整體感覺很不錯
第一次來到咖啡工作室氛圍感覺很不一樣
提供專業的咖啡烘豆和最新鮮的咖啡
也能協助我們找到最喜歡的咖啡風味
再搭配限量販售的甜點
溫馨的家庭式空間是個特別的體驗～
-
喜歡這篇文章可以點個愛心，也歡迎你追蹤 @maylifestyle04_ 讓我分享更多美食👏
-
🏷 陋皕咖啡工作室 @lobi_cafe_
🔖 🌕🌕🌕🌗🌑
☎️ 0910-788-153
⏰ 週四-週日13:00-22:00
📍 高雄市苓雅區永興街44號
🚇 捷運三多商圈站 步行10分鐘
（營業時間、公休日以店家公告為主）
-
更多高雄苓雅美食詳見👇
#maymayfood高雄苓雅美食 ✔️
-
#高雄食記may
#高雄 #高雄必吃 #高雄美食地圖 #高雄咖啡廳 #高雄咖啡 #高雄咖啡店 #高雄甜點 #高雄下午茶 #老宅咖啡 #高雄老屋 #苓雅區美食 #苓雅美食 #苓雅區 #三多商圈美食 #三多商圈 #陋皕咖啡 #外帶甜點 #咖啡教學 #中秋禮盒 #kaohsiung #kaohsiungfood

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

may well / may as well 意思差很多?!!【文法關鍵比一比】Ricky//英語小蛋糕

【Ricky 英語小蛋糕 🍰 x 自然學文法線上課程問卷】
問卷連結：https://www.surveycake.com/s/2xoW2
※協助填寫的朋友們，除了能在開課時收到最優惠價格的通知，還能額外獲得 300元 的課程折價券喔！

👉本次「may well / may as well」教材專區：
馬上領取: http://go.sat.cool/3huq4h

🎬複習自然文法系列（每集都有銜接，看完會更清楚喔！）
「8組介系詞from用法」https://youtu.be/NbTPneoe1Nw
「騙人的to」https://youtu.be/AezF77qyDyA
「分詞構句」https://youtu.be/HClXGN_N3Qc

📍新系列開張【自然學文法】⏰
主要是想讓大家學英文不只限於考試，而且可以用於生活中！
所以我的心文法系列，不會用生硬的課本解釋跟例句。
而是用我多年來教書的經驗，讓台灣學生用中文＋英文方式理解文法，
並且真實可以活用在日常生活（所以例句都會很時事😆）
請大家多多支持～～～
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#Ricky小蛋糕 #英文文法 #易混淆片語

國際新聞
【國際新聞：武漢肺炎】https://youtu.be/SRtsDI6iPRg
【國際新聞：2020台灣總統大選】https://youtu.be/slNQU8OQ5ww

英文文法
【感官型連綴動詞，look是一般動詞還是連綴動詞？】https://youtu.be/PhYo_Ae97Ro
【秒判斷單字詞性，易混淆的單字詞性】https://youtu.be/gvWetfXviTw
【名詞子句（上）】https://youtu.be/e_fzzCnJ_go

熱門影片
【去語言學校英文真的會變好？ 菲律賓語言學校推薦】https://youtu.be/bHEGfcP3jkc

多益高分系列
【多益高分7個必懂文法 】https://youtu.be/Os3eFKisucw
【新制多益8個必懂考前秘訣】多益990教我的事https://youtu.be/GkMkQ4I91uI

航空系列（考空服員\地勤）
【航空面試NG回答！一定不要這樣說】https://youtu.be/WvmyP2n1NyU
【第二關：角色扮演role play】https://youtu.be/UIXzsA6y0F0

實用英文系列
【超實用！職場必學五句片語】Ricky//英語小蛋糕https://youtu.be/Nj6ZfMODV2U
【完勝檢定！五種實用工具 輕鬆對付 聽說讀寫！】https://youtu.be/eVFGyS0QuA0
【一秒變外國人！增進聽力7大連音規則】https://youtu.be/9VYaHa4lwtA

來賓爆笑挑戰系列
【超爆笑聽力大考驗，熱門歌曲歌詞猜一猜】https://youtu.be/-LxlvkbDna0
【猜謎大亂鬥！英文片語猜猜看】https://youtu.be/Ri-fFz5Q-mI


我在AmazingTalker開課囉！
包含基本的生活會話，還有航空英文、商業英文
甚至是檢定英文，都可以來看看唷！
如果有其他英文需求也可以在頁面私訊我！
來我的教師頁面看看吧：
http://bit.ly/2WsxXvB

合作邀約 ricky@amazingtalker.com

maybe / may be ? 中文一樣，英文大不同【4組易混淆片語/單字】Ricky//英語小蛋糕

【Ricky 英語小蛋糕 🍰 x 自然學文法線上課程問卷】
問卷連結：https://www.surveycake.com/s/2xoW2
※協助填寫的朋友們，除了能在開課時收到最優惠價格的通知，還能額外獲得 300元 的課程折價券喔！

👉本次「4組易混淆片語/單字」教材專區：
馬上領取: http://go.sat.cool/3huq4h

今日比較片語/單字：（大家可以先想看看他們的中文意思、英文的用法，再來看看影片喔👍）
1. besides / except
2. replace / substitute
3. even if / even though
4. maybe / may be

🎬複習自然文法系列（每集都有銜接，看完會更清楚喔！）
「8組介系詞from用法」https://youtu.be/NbTPneoe1Nw
「騙人的to」https://youtu.be/AezF77qyDyA
「分詞構句」https://youtu.be/HClXGN_N3Qc

📍新系列開張【自然學文法】⏰
主要是想讓大家學英文不只限於考試，而且可以用於生活中！
所以我的心文法系列，不會用生硬的課本解釋跟例句。
而是用我多年來教書的經驗，讓台灣學生用中文＋英文方式理解文法，
並且真實可以活用在日常生活（所以例句都會很時事😆）
請大家多多支持～～～
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#Ricky小蛋糕 #英文文法 #易混淆片語

國際新聞
【國際新聞：武漢肺炎】https://youtu.be/SRtsDI6iPRg
【國際新聞：2020台灣總統大選】https://youtu.be/slNQU8OQ5ww

英文文法
【感官型連綴動詞，look是一般動詞還是連綴動詞？】https://youtu.be/PhYo_Ae97Ro
【秒判斷單字詞性，易混淆的單字詞性】https://youtu.be/gvWetfXviTw
【名詞子句（上）】https://youtu.be/e_fzzCnJ_go

熱門影片
【去語言學校英文真的會變好？ 菲律賓語言學校推薦】https://youtu.be/bHEGfcP3jkc

多益高分系列
【多益高分7個必懂文法 】https://youtu.be/Os3eFKisucw
【新制多益8個必懂考前秘訣】多益990教我的事https://youtu.be/GkMkQ4I91uI

航空系列（考空服員\地勤）
【航空面試NG回答！一定不要這樣說】https://youtu.be/WvmyP2n1NyU
【第二關：角色扮演role play】https://youtu.be/UIXzsA6y0F0

實用英文系列
【超實用！職場必學五句片語】Ricky//英語小蛋糕https://youtu.be/Nj6ZfMODV2U
【完勝檢定！五種實用工具 輕鬆對付 聽說讀寫！】https://youtu.be/eVFGyS0QuA0
【一秒變外國人！增進聽力7大連音規則】https://youtu.be/9VYaHa4lwtA

來賓爆笑挑戰系列
【超爆笑聽力大考驗，熱門歌曲歌詞猜一猜】https://youtu.be/-LxlvkbDna0
【猜謎大亂鬥！英文片語猜猜看】https://youtu.be/Ri-fFz5Q-mI


我在AmazingTalker開課囉！
包含基本的生活會話，還有航空英文、商業英文
甚至是檢定英文，都可以來看看唷！
如果有其他英文需求也可以在頁面私訊我！
來我的教師頁面看看吧：
http://bit.ly/2WsxXvB

合作邀約 ricky@amazingtalker.com

10個look片語 #01 (第一支影片)
https://youtu.be/_caw9bMfJlo

look at 看著
look for 尋找
look into 調查；研究
look up 查找
look over 快速看過

**************************
我的新頻道：歡迎加入
學習單字發音與用法，實用例句，延伸句，情境句
Say and learn words with Gina
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuzfZrVItqnsuYZlW5ubdtQ

加入吉娜英文FB 粉絲頁
學習更多道地美式口語英文
https://www.facebook.com/wordsgo/

****************
吉娜提供教學服務：
KK音標課程
基礎英文從頭學起
學好英文諮詢
請寫信到
webmaster@wordsgo.com

****************
look out 小心；注意；保護
Look out! There’s a car coming.
Look out! That snake is poisonous.
小心！有一輛車開過來。小心！那隻蛇有毒。

Look out for the exit off the highway. I don’t want to miss it.
你要注意公路的出口。我不想要錯失它。

Her brother always looks out for her. He wants to keep his little sister safe.
她的哥哥總是保護她。他想要維護妹妹的安全。

Look outside. It’s really raining heavily!
你看外面。雨真的下很大！

****************
look down 向下看；小看，瞧不起人
Look down! There’s poop on the ground. Don’t step in it.
看下面。地上有屎。不要踩到。

A: This building is really tall!
B: If you are afraid of heights, don’t look down!
A: 這棟建築度真的很高！
B: 如果你怕高，不要往下看。

He looks down on Mary for having less education. He thinks he’s so much better than her.
他因為瑪莉受比較少的教育就瞧不起她。他自認為他比瑪莉好很多。

Don’t look down on me because I don’t make a lot of money.
不要因為我沒有賺很多的錢就瞧不起我。

****************
look after 照顧
She was hired to look after their two young children.
A: Can you look after my daughter for me?
B: Sure, I can come to your house to watch her.
A: 你可以幫我照顧我的女兒嗎？
B: 可以，我可以去你家顧她。

I hired a babysitter to take care of my child.
我雇用一個保母照顧我的孩子。

I’m taking care of my sister’s dog while she is on vacation.
我正在照顧我姊姊的狗，她在渡假。

****************
look around 到處看看，逛逛，參觀某個地方
A: May I help you?
B: No, thank you. I’m just looking. (I’m just looking around.)
A: 有什麼需要我幫忙的嗎？
B: 不用，謝謝你。我只是看看。

This is the house I’m selling. Have a look around and let me know if you have any questions.
這是我正在賣的房子。你看看，如果有任何問題，請讓我知道。

I’m going to have a look around Costco. Do you want to go with me?
我要去Costco逛逛。你想要跟我去嗎？

I’m looking around for a new apartment. I have to move out of mine soon.
我正在找一間新的公寓。我很快就必須搬出去了。

****************
look forward to 期待；期盼
Thank you for inviting me to dinner on Saturday. I’m looking forward to it.
謝謝你邀請我星期六一起吃晚餐。我非常期待。

A: I’m still thinking about it. Once I make a decision, I’ll let you know.
B: I look forward to hearing from you.
A: 我還在考慮之中。一旦我做決定之後，我會讓你知道。
B: 我期待聽到你的消息。

The children were looking forward to their class trip to the amusement park.
這些孩子們期待遊樂園之行。

She’s looking forward to marrying her boyfriend next year. She’s trying on wedding dresses now.
她期待明年嫁給她的男朋友。她現在正在試穿婚紗。