關於 狗公lihkg ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

更多有關新屋嶺嘅消息....... 🤬

#update
#原post樓主話已起對方底話係狗公假扮
#我吾知佢點樣起到對方底
#雖然黑警吾方咁好死
#不過點都寧願炒車都吾希望係真

補返個傳送門比大家

救人呀!!!!
https://lih.kg/1679335
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

黑警你別以為你地可以逍遙法外, 天網灰灰, 你拋出既回力標一定會返黎你身邊

【專題訪問 Interview Feature】2019年度香港大學學生會周年大選中央幹事會候選常務祕書麥嘉晉訪問 | Interview with Mak Ka Chun Eugene, the Proposed General Secretary of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union of Annual Election 2019

(Please scroll down for English version.)

麥嘉晉同學以一人莊姿態參選中央幹事會常務祕書一職，為除候選內閣「蒼傲」外，另一參選周年大選中央幹事會席位的單位。麥同學接受本台訪問，就其一人內閣的理念、參選原因、和自身網上流出片段解話，並就反對香港獨立及支持訂立國歌法作闡述。

訪問節錄如下：

1. 對常務祕書一職的了解？
我並不對常務祕書，即香港大學學生會中央幹事會的常務祕書的職責有太清楚的認識。

2. 為何參選常務祕書而非其他職位？
我參選常務祕書的原因是因為我認為自己並不能勝任主席（正確名稱應為會長）一職，我是一個小心、心思細密的人，能力主要在於常務祕書方面。

3. 你認為自己被釣狗公及流出不雅影片會否對選情有影響？
對於這件事，我明白大家對我有負面印象，我希望向對我有負面印象的人道歉，因為我令到香港大學的聲譽受損。但這件事也令到有些人認識了我，客觀而言，他們都會明白這是一個失誤，並知道這事並不影響我的政治理念或影響我向他們服務。我亦明白有人會因這件事對我有負面印象，我會努力透過選舉工程爭取選民對我的信心。

（參考資料：［有圖］求智囊團撚狗公 https://lihkg.com/t/640617/1?ref=android ）

4. 你心目中學生會的立場是？
我們必須多考慮多角度及不同持份者的意見才作出表態，所以我不能肯定有幸當選後會作出什麼取態。我個人不太熱衷於政治方面，在大部分議題方面我的路線比較中間偏左。

5. 你為何決定單獨參選？
因為即使我未能組成內閣，我都希望做到我參選的目的，就是希望令人看到香港大學學生會並非像外界看來激進。我希望能令人看到香港大學的學生並不是只得一種思路，大家都有獨立思想，所以即使只有一人亦會參選。

6. 假若四位候選幹事同事當選，如何處理意見分歧？
如果日後四位候選人有幸一同當選，但就不同議題有相反意見的話，我認為政治取態並非港大學生會惟一職務，其他職務例如學生會組織的行政事務、和為學生提供福利、服務學生等等。所以我認為並不會單因為取態不同而辭職，其他事項不可以置之不理。

7. 你的政治光譜/政治立場是什麼？
我個人本身並不太熱衷於參與政治方面，在大部分議題我的立場傾向於中間偏左。

8. 你可否用香港的政治組織/政治人物代表自己？
個人而言我並不激進，所以我認為以前的民主黨可能比較能反映我現在的立場。如果從人物方面我認為湯家驊先生可能比較能反映到我，因為湯家驊先生和我一樣是比較會從多角度處事的人，其次他比較冷靜，不會草率進行評論和反應，而他亦不會就所有事情有既定立場，對不合理或不認該支持的事情他不會基於他泛民主派的立場而違背自己的理念，所以湯家驊先生及以前的公民黨會比較能反映和接近我的政治立場。

9. 你對初一事件的看法？
暫時可見旺角暴動或年初一事件方面，很多人都不太願意承擔自己的責任，而我認為很多參加者都罔顧了香港大眾的聲音和理念，亦危害了其他人的安全，我個人並不支持或同意這件事，如有人對這方面有意見的話，我希望大家能以理性方法表達意見。

10. 你是否支持香港獨立？
首先我不同意和不支持香港獨立。對於香港獨立我有幾點要回應。我不支持香港獨立的原因是因為，我認為香港多年來和中國有關係，香港在多方面亦須要中國的幫助，不論是經濟、社會、還是政策配套，我們都必須和中國有緊密連繫。當然我有不同意中國的政策，如對言論自由的打壓和對人權的打壓等，但我認為不應因反對中國而原全斷絕關係，始終歷史上我們和中國有非常緊密的聯繫，不可以因一些事去全盤否定中國，同時我認為香港獨立在法律上並不合法，所以我不會支持這種不合法的東西出現。因為香港獨立並不合法再加上這事並不合適，所以我並不支持香港獨立。但我認為可在可容許的空間內討論，例如學術層面或政治方面，我認為只要不鼓吹港獨，單純理性討論是可容許的，因為這是一種思想，而思想應可被討論。

11. 你是否同意訂立國歌法？
我認為國歌法的立法原意合理，並且應該，大家只要願意去尊重國歌和願意為自己的行為負責，我認為國歌法的立法有應該要的，因為我認為應尊重國歌。除了利用國歌表達意見外，還有很多意見表達的方式，雖然國歌法有機會收窄了大家的言論自由，但大家仍有其他對中國表達意見的渠道，所以我認為國歌法的影響並非如此誇張。

12. 你是否同意就廿三條法？
暫時短期而言不該對廿三條立法，但如果日後香港社會出現了嚴重的安全問題，而現時的法律制度未能控制，我認為廿三條立法......未必是廿三條立法，但應保障社會安全，加強執法，修改現有法律去增強它的權力、增強它的阻嚇性，希望能保障社會的安全。

Mak Ka Chun Eugene is running as a one-man cabinet in the Annual Election 2019. He is another candidate unit running for a seat in the Union’s Executive Committee, besides Prism, the proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union in Annual Election 2019. Campus TV has interviewed with Mak, with regards to his vision of a one-man cabinet, the reason to run as candidate, and the leakage of his personal videos; he has also elaborated on his disagreeing with Hong Kong independence and supporting the enactment of the National Anthem Bill.

The interview excerpts are as follows:

1. What is your understanding of the post of General Secretary?
I might not have too clear of an understanding about the post of General Secretary, i.e. the duties of the General Secretary of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union.

2. Why did you choose to run for the post of the General Secretary out of other posts?
The reason for running for the General Secretary is because I do not believe I have what it takes to assume the post of the Chairperson (the correct title should be: “President”). I am a rather careful and meticulous person, and my abilities are more in line with the area of the General Secretary, such as word/ document processing, and handling emails.

3. Do you think your incident* about being exposed as a womanizer, and the leakage of your explicit videos have an impact on your election campaign?
I understand that I have left a negative impression on some people from this incident; I would like to apologize to these people, because I have scathed the reputation of the University as a student of the University. In addition, this incident has made me known to public. Objectively speaking, some might consider the incident as a mistake, and that it would not affect my political stance or my service to them (members of the Students’ Union). Meanwhile, I do recognize that this incident has created a negative impression of myself, I will try my best to gain the trust of people from my election campaign.

*Mak Ka Chun Eugene was allegedly exposed as a womanizer, some explicit photos and videos of Mak in a conversation have been leaked by an anonymous account onto Lihkg, a public forum in Hong Kong.

4. What is the position of the Students’ Union in your eyes?
We should take into considerations the various perspectives and stakeholders’ opinions before declaring a stance, therefore I am not sure what I will be standing for should I be elected. Personally, I am not too keen on politics, but I would say that for most issues, I take more of a centre-left position.

5. Why did you decide to run as an independent candidate?
Despite not having formed a cabinet, I wish to fulfill my election aim: I hope to show the society how The Hong Kong University Students’ Union is not as radical and one-sidedly biased as how the society perceives it to be. I hope people could see that the Union has not only one path of thinking, everybody has individual thinking. Therefore, I would run as candidate even if I am doing so alone.

6. Should four proposed candidates of the Executive Committee be elected, how would discrepancy of views be dealt with?
If all four candidates have the honour to be elected, and have disparate views on issues, I think (acting on one’s) political views is not the Union’s only duty, there are other duties including administrative work, representing students, providing students’ welfare etc. Therefore, I do not think I would resign solely over a discrepancy on political views, other duties should not be neglected.

7. Where do you stand on the political spectrum? / How would you define your political stance?
I am not too keen on politics, but I would say that for most issues, I take more of a centre-left position.

8. Could you use a political group or a political figure in Hong Kong to represent yourself?
I think it is quite difficult to say, because Hong Kong’s politics has been so polarizing. Personally, I do not consider myself radical (politically), so I think the earlier Democratic Party better represents my current stance. In terms of a political figure, I think Mr Ronny Tong Ka-wah can better represent me, because like Tong, I know how to handle matters from multiple perspectives. Besides, Tong is a rather collected politician, he knows not to carelessly react and comment; he does not hold a predetermined stance towards issues, and he does not let his pan-democratic background dictate his views on matters that he thinks are unreasonable or not deserving of his support. Therefore, Mr Ronny Tong Ka-wah and the earlier Democratic Party is better proximate and representative of my political stance.

9. What are your views on the Mong Kok Incident in 2016?
What I observe currently about the Mong Kok Riot, or my apologies, it should be the Mong Kok Incident, is that many people are unwilling to bear responsibility for their actions, and I think a lot of the participants (of the incident) were rather reckless and negligent in considering the majority of Hong Kong’s opinion, they have also harmed the safety of many. I personally do not support nor agree with this action. However, I believe all voices should be heard, if anyone has an opinion on an issue, I hope they can convey them in a rational manner.

10. Do you support Hong Kong independence?
Firstly, I do not agree with nor support Hong Kong independence, but I think that the idea itself can be discussed on an academic or political level, as long as we are not encouraging the actualisation of it, we can have purely theoretical discussion because it is like any other thought or ideology that can be discussed. In response to Hong Kong independence, I have a few points to raise.
I do not support Hong Kong independence because I think that Hong Kong has established long years of relationship with China, Hong Kong needs the support of China in multiple areas, no matter economic, social, or policy-wise. We should always have a close connection to China. Certainly, I do not agree with all of China’s policies, for example the oppression of freedom of speech and of human rights, but I do not think we should cut ties with China entirely based on these disagreements. Ultimately, China and we have had a very close affiliation historically. At the same time, I think that Hong Kong independence is not legally justified, so I would not support such an illegal action. Because Hong Kong independence is not legal and not suitable, I do not support it.

11. Do you agree with the enactment of the National Anthem Bill?
I think the motive of the enacting the National Anthem Bill is justified, and (the act) should be encouraged. As long as everyone is willing to respect the national anthem and to bear responsibility for their own actions, I think the enactment of the National Anthem Bill is necessary, because I respect the national anthem. Besides using the national anthem as a form of self-expression (of political opinions or views), there are many other ways to communicate an opinion. Although freedom of speech might be harmed under the enactment of the bill, there are still other methods to convey our opinions about China, so I do not foresee the effect of the National Anthem Bill to be as severe as it is portrayed to be.

12. Do you agree with the enactment of Article 23?
Currently and in the short run, Article 23 should not be enacted. However, if Hong Kong experiences a problem of safety in the future, one that the current legal system has no power to control, I think that it may call for Article 23… not necessarily Article 23, but an enhanced enforcement of the law, the law should be amended to strengthen its power and deterring functions to ensure the safety of our society.
___________________________________

二零一九年度香港大學學生會周年大選其他候選人包括中央幹事會候選內閣蒼傲、校園電視候選內閣、學苑候選編輯委員會及候選普選評議員。

2019年度周年大選中央諮詢大會將於一月二十一日至一月二十五日在中山廣場舉行，時間為下午十二時半至二時半。

Other candidates for the Annual Election 2019 include Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, the Proposed Cabinet of Campus TV, the Proposed Editorial Board of Undergrad, and the Proposed Popularly Elected Union Councillor.

The Central Campaign for Annual Election 2019 will be held from the 21st to 25th of January at the Sun Yat-sen Place, from 12:30 to 14:30.

【可憐】杜狗終日妄想與劉德華相提並論 扮「結仇內幕」勢不兩立刷存在感? 71收佢皮 國安處百警搜毒果 凍結資產拘反中高層?黃官何俊堯再調職 正義來臨? 神舟十二號勁揪|高Sir正能量17062021


#小市民憑良心做實事講真相
#小小人物做小事


YT技術限流和自動退粉，離封台不遠，請幫忙高Sir正能量?訂閱?分享影片救亡:https://www.youtube.com/jackyko1109kosir?sub_confirmation=1

————————————————————

#HongKongNews
#現代版雷鋒
#小市民憑良心
#做實事講真相
#支持國安法
#男人幫大聯盟  
#KOL100
#青年快閃社區清潔大行動
#人間記者會
#青年護旗手

——————————————————
五星正能量?  真係爆哂燈?

高Sir疑遭技術限流，請大家幫幫手：

1. 訂閱「高松傑 - 高Sir正能量」youtube 頻道 (訂閱係免費架)  https://www.youtube.com/jackyko1109kosir?sub_confirmation=1 ；
2. 撳?搶先睇；
3. 贊好並留言支持；
4. 將影片分享開去；
5. 關注好高Sir微博/抖音: https://weibo.com/jackyko1109
https://v.douyin.com/Jgbqjor/

/https://twitter.com/Sir38651475

Payme [捐款]: https://payme.hsbc/deepwebkid

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tour
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/album/2LjUOH9T9j21GiX8jzytu6
訂閱: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8vabPSRIBpwSJEMAPCnzVQ?sub_confirmation=1

我最高觀看次數的影片 (我為何不再拍暗網? 只說一次): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbihKaqEEQw&t=127s

首支單曲: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UASHWB6Ai9Y

我的成長故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdhtp6A6YJE

這位才是真正的網絡垃圾: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlJYDx1GP-U&t=263s

Billie Eilish出賣靈魂的方法: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfB1S2uy5Po&t=115s
日本最殘酷的直播節目: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E81OKVX7wc
我受夠了, 我的精神困擾: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ6uxaQhiS4&t=7s

買賣 姜濤幣對香港年輕人的影響 (自肥企劃)
恐怖 '姜濤幣' 對香港年輕人的影響 | 自肥企劃
為何恐怖姜濤幣是香港終極自肥企劃?
破解恐怖姜濤幣是香港終極自肥企劃
Keung to bitcoin

(This video is not financial advice)

‘姜濤幣 被炒至3400港元一個 花姐不認同做法: 擔心中’ 花姐應該要擔心的. 因為有機會有人利用明星名氣chauw高姜濤幣和mirror 虛擬貨幣
cryptocurrency 來到自己賺錢.

最後有機會viutv和 姜濤本人可能一元也收不到. 粉絲們恐防變了白給錢

大家好又是我暗網仔!

今天影片主要用經濟學理論 ‘speculative bubble’ 和美國近日飽受爭議性的 ‘明星虛擬貨幣網站’ Bitclout解釋投資界和娛樂界結合這個大 趨勢, 對香港年輕人的危機.

和對 姜濤的愛...各位姜糖不要打我啊...(show love sign) haha


(Logo)


“姜糖” “姜b “ 這些terms來自於 “姜濤”, 一個你們肯定聽過的名字. He’s everywhere, viutv全民造星比賽後廣告, 巴士, 頒獎禮.
5月他的組合Mirror舉行了多場演唱會後, 連投資界也做出 ‘Keung To’ token貨幣和MirrorHK貨幣.
拍攝這影片之時巿面上總共有100,000個姜濤 幣, 持有人目前有5位.

其實這算是舊新聞, 因為很多網上publication已經把事件報道.
創造出 姜濤幣, mirror 幣之後甚至想創造 193 幣的candy 說自己會把現在炒到高達 $508美金1個的姜濤幣用private key (私密金鑰) 方式在IG 傳給姜濤.

(姜濤幣問題)

即使我們相信Candy 真是會把虛擬貨幣private key私訊給每12位, 不講 姜濤一天收到多少個粉絲 message,該private key (可以是一大堆1和零) (可以是3v5hk69hj) 是一個能儲存虛擬貨幣的錢包. 私隱度應該要極大. 甚至除了姜濤本人之外不應有任何一個人知道. 否則容易俾人偷取. 現在這個情況至少有Candy另一個人知道. 我們亦不能夠排除如果姜濤 收到貨幣後, 幫手令到姜濤幣炒得更貴後, Candy會否之後把private key洩漏給其他人, 自己拿回這些幣, 或創造更多姜濤幣在市面上買賣.
根本太多可能性定令到姜濤和他的公司太被動.
程序上也是不對. 因為現在是迫 姜濤本人接收這批貨幣，然後隨即上網留意虛擬貨幣的走勢. 如果他真的是一hiw不通呢? 要他的公司負責管理者一筆錢?

( Candy的動機)
新聞報道多個上了年紀的少婦都因為這個姜濤熱潮做回少女. Candy的動機是否真的完全是愛我不知道, 但某些Youtube頻道説她只是一心想賺錢..這個又未必.

虛擬貨幣當中大的有最常被討論的Bitcoin. 可以到$40,000美元一個. 其實 姜濤幣mirror幣只是token的一種, 當然沒有Bitcoin那麼普及所以相對地也會平一點. 我如何知道每一種不同token的價錢？因為其實我們每一位有電腦的人用blockchain這樣東西也能夠知道. cryptocurrency雖然不被任何政府或銀行管制, 但每一次交易其實也能用cryptography(密碼學)有行蹤可尋。

姜濤幣mirror 幣193幣我們同樣能夠check到. 姜濤幣用的這個 ‘BEP-20’ 是其中最常用的交易準則. 所以很容易看到candy創造出的數量和所有的交易. 當然持有其他 姜濤幣的人士身份或跟candy的關係我們根本不知道. 其他身份會否也是跟candy有所連繫幫她賺錢呢？

(speculative bubble=賭博?)
姜濤幣 不是第一個用名人創造的虛擬貨幣. 由2019年菲律賓拳手manny pacquiao直到原本只是一個笑話的Dogecoin, 到現在Elon musk用這個有隻狗頭的貨幣做他2022年上月球計劃的經費.
這樣dogecoin, 這個笑話就因為一些memes和名人在twitter發的一兩個tweet就紅了, 價值也同時提高了很多.
這就是虛擬貨幣最大的問題: 他的價值是跟著一個speculative bubble, 意思是一個貨幣 的價值不是因為那樣東西的內在價值,?而取決於當時有多少人那段時間覺得要買那集貨幣 令到牠的價值提高.

突然的價格上升下滑不像正常巿場走勢, 反而像 賭博, 因為一個Elon musk 的消息你可以賺好多或者蝕好多. 而如果加埋買的貨幣是和自己偶像有關的, 加上那種情感上的投資. 這更加像 賭博而對年輕人更加不好.
-the future like bitclout
4月頭幾十名最多follower的twitter帳號(Elon musk, Justin Bieber, lady Gaga) 突然在一個名bitclout的網站出現. 概念像 姜濤幣, 能購買自己支持的名人. 而像IG而社交平台形式運作.
除即收到的爭議是這平台的創作人是沒有經這些名人許可來創造他們的帳號.
是他們的粉絲給錢之持他們後, 他們的帳號有一個數目. 是要他們自己之後去領取. 與 姜濤情況相似.
之後很多名人有領取粉絲給他們的錢. 但亦有很多說會有法律上的行動.
其實這個賺錢social media賣的只是名氣，像fans club一樣. 但錢未必落到偶像袋. （news)
玩玩就可以. 賭博也可以. 真正投資一個人那裡, 這風險實在太大也是愚蠢.
像花姐所講: 不認同做法.
有時粉絲太着意你好像做這個韓國愛的手勢. 但要了解在內國這個手勢動一動其實是錢的意思啊!

https://inews.hket.com/article/2958483/【姜濤幣】姜濤、MIRROR被註冊為虛擬貨幣%20%20逾百人持有「姜濤幣」

https://www.hk01.com/即時娛樂/625650/姜濤幣-被炒至3400港元一個-花姐不認同做法-擔心中

【唔係走佬】老公移民台灣 大律師公會葉巧琦陪行「隔離」? 梁家傑無情泛民無義 與支聯會劃清界線?利君雅炒魷 杜狗仲唔養佢一世?|高Sir正能量04052021


YT技術限流和自動退粉，離封台不遠，請幫忙高Sir正能量?訂閱?分享影片救亡:https://www.youtube.com/jackyko1109kosir?sub_confirmation=1

————————————————————

#HongKongNews
#現代版雷鋒
#小市民憑良心
#做實事講真相
#支持國安法
#男人幫大聯盟  
#KOL100
#青年快閃社區清潔大行動
#人間記者會
#青年護旗手

——————————————————
五星正能量?  真係爆哂燈?

高Sir疑遭技術限流，請大家幫幫手：

1. 訂閱「高松傑 - 高Sir正能量」youtube 頻道 (訂閱係免費架)  https://www.youtube.com/jackyko1109kosir?sub_confirmation=1 ；
2. 撳?搶先睇；
3. 贊好並留言支持；
4. 將影片分享開去；
5. 關注好高Sir微博/抖音: https://weibo.com/jackyko1109
https://v.douyin.com/Jgbqjor/

/https://twitter.com/Sir38651475