🎥 #人權影展 #活動快訊🎥
「現實生活中許多侵害人權的現象是隱而不見的,如何讓在主流論述支配下被邊緣化、被排斥,以及壓制的聲音真正地被聽到,是關注人權議題的重要途徑。」
國家人權博物館每年度舉辦「臺灣國際人權影展 」,精選國內外與人權議題相關的精彩影片,進行人權教育推廣。國際人權影展今(2021)年邁入第五年。每一年度選片期間,策展團隊深入討論影片之間的相互關聯、如何建立影展欲傳遞的人權觀點,都相當精彩且可貴。更重要的是,人權影展透過多元的選片視角,開發每一部電影討論人權相關議題的潛力。
⧔2021臺灣國際人權影展⧕
線上影展|10.22~10.31
聚落放映|10.15~11.30
—————
🎥人權影展活動訊息🎥
兩場主題式講座、邀請三位領域專家,透過專題性的深入對談,以及親身走訪臺灣人權博物館現場,帶領觀眾進行人權教育的臨場洗禮;透過最根基的啟發與思辨,讓人權教育不再只是被遺忘的一堂課。
面對環境的永續與發展效益、人類歷史的記憶傳承,我們可以留給下一代什麼?
🎞教育推廣講座(一)何處是我家:土地正義不妥協🎞
時間|10月2日(六)14:00~15:30
講者|馬躍・比吼(Mayaw Biho)
主持|宋育成(府中15研究助理)
地點|光點台北,多功能藝文廳
報名|https://bit.ly/397rb5X
🎞教育推廣講座(二)人權解封:轉型正義不下課🎞
流程|10月9日(六)
13:30 ~ 15:00對談講座
15:20 ~ 16:20博物館導覽
與談|陳瑤華(東吳大學人權碩士學位學程教授)
關子尹(國立清華大學哲學研究所客座教授)
地點|國家人權博物館,人權學習中心
報名|https://bit.ly/3CdVK6x
🎞2021臺灣國際人權影展線上選片指南🎞
時間|10月13日(三)20:00~21:30
講者|王君琦 ‧ 郭敏容(臺灣國際人權影展選片委員)
主持|蘇蔚婧(2021臺灣國際人權影展統籌)
報名|https://bit.ly/3lYzBmc
直播平台|臺灣國際人權影展 臉書專頁
國家人權博物館 YouTube 頻道
—————
|#臺灣國際人權影展|#環境|#民主|#人權|#轉型正義 |
國家人權博物館 National Human Rights Museum
臺灣國際人權影展
—————
㊯贊助Openbook,參與從台灣土地長出的原創文化
●了解更多:https://lihi1.com/QrPU4
●訂閱電子報:https://lihi1.com/EbuBe
●追蹤Openbook IG:https://goo.gl/Enkzy3
同時也有24部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過11萬的網紅包子隊長,也在其Youtube影片中提到,全台聲援黃媽媽記者會 現場直播 拒絕國家霸凌 停止人權迫害 大家一起站出來 ♥️小額贊助♥️包子隊長 https://p.ecpay.com.tw/9755E 信用卡、ATM、網路ATM、超商都通用 ⭐訂閱包子隊長一起捍衛中華民國: https://www.youtube.com/c...
「30 human rights」的推薦目錄:
- 關於30 human rights 在 Openbook閱讀誌 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於30 human rights 在 夾腳拖劇團 Flip Flops Theatre Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於30 human rights 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於30 human rights 在 包子隊長 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於30 human rights 在 すゑひろがりず局番 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於30 human rights 在 Taiwan Bar Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於30 human rights 在 Universal Declaration of Human Rights -- Articles 1-30 的評價
- 關於30 human rights 在 United Nations Human Rights - Video on UDHR Art. 30 的評價
30 human rights 在 夾腳拖劇團 Flip Flops Theatre Facebook 的精選貼文
親愛的朋友們,讓大家久等了!❤
原定9月10日至 9月12日於人權館禮堂演出的《說好不要哭》雖因疫情取消了,但當時的我們面對已經搭設好的海底世界以及喜愛我們的觀眾,我們決定繼續努力,並趕在璨樹颱風造成威脅前與工作人員們一起將演出紀錄、拍攝下來,希望能夠與大家在這疫情中同在。
《說好不要哭》改編自同名繪本,同時也是改編自白色恐怖政治受難者陳欽生先生的生命故事。故事內容講述一段關於海豚東東充滿愛與勇氣的返家之路,而我們希望藉由這個故事,讓孩子認識這片土地上的過去,同時也體會生命的各種面向,並期待所有的孩子們進而了解民主與自由之可貴。
我們特別感謝 國家人權博物館 National Human Rights Museum 的支持,才讓我們得以走到這邊與大家相見,所以這個周末邀請大家跟我們一起來與東東線上相會 ❤
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
【#說好不要哭_線上播映資訊】
觀看網址|
https://youtu.be/8GIDmpPs7R8(夾腳拖YT)
https://youtu.be/T-im-NOb978(人權館YT)
觀看期限|10/1(五)19:30 起至 10/3(日)22:30 止
票券下載|https://reurl.cc/43aAYL
節目單下載|https://reurl.cc/NZrknk
問卷下載|https://forms.gle/yuBG5K9fCm5caD1Q8
主辦單位|國家人權博物館
製作單位|夾腳拖劇團
30 human rights 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的最佳貼文
毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
30 human rights 在 包子隊長 Youtube 的最佳解答
全台聲援黃媽媽記者會
現場直播
拒絕國家霸凌
停止人權迫害
大家一起站出來
♥️小額贊助♥️包子隊長
https://p.ecpay.com.tw/9755E
信用卡、ATM、網路ATM、超商都通用
⭐訂閱包子隊長一起捍衛中華民國:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfYig2nRSwuwpUHxIzhkmcQ
✅訂閱
⭕分享
🔔開小鈴鐺
這樣有最新影片的時候
就會即時提醒大家觀看唷🤗
如果有任何建議與意見情報分享
FB粉絲專頁:
包子隊長-捍衛中華
https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Non-Governmental-Organization--NGO-/%E5%9C%9F%E5%8C%85%E5%AD%90%E5%BF%97%E5%B7%A5%E5%9C%98-415101675977305/
包子隊長的店
全台首間韓流小物店
好哆福 好物.好文創.好主意
好哆福 快樂.鬆餅.茶
電話:(02) 2351~4688
營業時間:11:30~19:30(每週二公休)
地址:台北市紹興南街15-2號(近仁愛路)
捷運最近是善導寺6號往5號方向走約6分鐘(因為5號要爬樓梯)
公車:搭乘至仁愛紹興街口⬇️↙️
(仁愛幹線.原263)261.270.621.37.651.630
備用副頻道
無所不包
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtao4A1HwuqTiCu_6isijhg
#全台聲援黃媽媽 #台南記者會 #捍衛人權 #精神受創休養中
#韓國瑜 #高雄市長
#愛與包容
#包子隊長
#live #直播 #頻道
#love
30 human rights 在 すゑひろがりず局番 Youtube 的最佳解答
すゑひろがりずが『ヒューマンフォールフラット』を狂言風にゲーム実況します!
Human: Fall Flat (ヒューマン フォール フラット)とは、
2人で協力して出口を目指すシンプルなアクションパズルゲームです!
二人のネタが大好きな方はゲームを知らなくても楽しめます!
前回のおさらい【#4】
https://youtu.be/X0OdV-sNm4Q
出口を探し歩いているとレバーを発見した二人。
すゑひろがりずは、そのレバーをマイクに見立てて、
今の若者があまり知らない歌を大熱唱する!?
まるで90年代のCDTVを観てるようです。
1:49 いいわけ(シャ乱Q)
2:24 Money(浜田省吾)
6:30 HOWEVER (GLAY)
コロナに負けるな!笑いで免疫力アップ!
なかなか外出できない時期ですが、自宅でも外出気分が楽しめる動画になっています!
オススメ!おうちで最新話まで一気見!
↓ どうぶつの森 狂言ゲーム実況 全話まとめ ↓
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qcNqfxIRdY&list=PLthM7-6mPY8QjC2eXQCObds2f-BN1bU6Q
↓ バイオハザードRE:3 狂言ゲーム実況 全話まとめ ↓
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxstEmEBccc&list=PLthM7-6mPY8QqloXxyGZ2LEj9XsR5AOEf
©CAPCOM CO., LTD. 1999, 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
おうちでゆっくり最終回までの一気観をオススメします!
↓ バイオハザードRE:2 狂言ゲーム実況 全話まとめ ↓
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLthM7-6mPY8QTpg6DYz-FvDufaHiknJKq
©CAPCOM CO., LTD. 1998, 2019 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
【すゑひろがりず局番】
当チャンネルでは、ゲーム実況を中心にありとあらゆる物を狂言風に変換しています!
是非、他の動画もお楽しみ下さい!
ご要望などございましたら是非、目安箱(コメント欄)まで!全て拝見致します!
チャンネル登録お願いします!
【Twitter】
すゑひろがりず南條→ https://twitter.com/GSOPnanjo
すゑひろがりず三島→ https://twitter.com/SUEmishima
カナメクト(編集) → https://twitter.com/KANAME_kohakura
#吉本自宅劇場 #すゑひろがりず #うちで過ごそう
30 human rights 在 Taiwan Bar Youtube 的最佳貼文
#歡迎光臨臺灣吧 #童話故事 #還是出現在故事裡就好了
你哭著對我說~童話裡沒有人權的♬
我不可能去竄改故事~♬
童話裡有著高潮迭起的情節,
讓我們看得津津有味😃
但如果這種情節出現在現實...
那就太恐怖啦😱!
糖果屋,丟棄小孩的養母。
賣火柴的小女孩,飢餓的童工。
我們都不會希望現實有小朋友遭受這種待遇。
2020年是國際兒童人權30周年🧒
就讓我們透過童話故事來了解,
童話裡哪些行為侵害了兒童的權利呢?
快敲敲「梅林的童話兒童諮詢所」的門,
跟著梅林與童話故事,
一起來了解兒童人權吧👉👉👉
國家人權博物館 National Human Rights Museum X 臺灣吧 - Taiwan Bar
與您一同關心人權議題!
--
🔔不多說訂閱臺灣吧頻道| https://lihi.cc/0SEYv
🍺臺灣吧FB 會有YT沒有的貼文和影片|
https://www.facebook.com/taiwanbarstudio
🍺臺灣吧IG 想再靠近一點點|
https://www.instagram.com/taiwan_bar/...
黑啤FB很可愛快來看|https://www.facebook.com/beeru.official/
黑啤IG一樣很可愛來看|https://www.instagram.com/beeru_tw/
臺灣吧線上賣場,很好買慎入|http://taiwanbar.shoplineapp.com/
合作邀約 來酒吧聊聊吧|business@taiwanbar.cc
30 human rights 在 Universal Declaration of Human Rights -- Articles 1-30 的推薦與評價
Mar 31, 2016 - Listen to and read Articles 1-30 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed in 1948. ... <看更多>