英文學術寫作寶典 7: Being Critical 批判思考句型 1
Ready for more academic phrases?
最新的學術寫作片語在這裡,希望可以幫助大家寫出好文章!
例句和音檔: https://bit.ly/3aqaQcP
★★★★★★★★★★★★
As an academic writer, you are expected to be critical of the sources that you use. This essentially means questioning what you read and not necessarily agreeing with it just because the information has been published. Being critical can also mean looking for reasons why we should not just accept something as being correct or true. This can require you to identify problems with a writer’s arguments or methods, or perhaps to refer to other people’s criticisms of these. Constructive criticism goes beyond this by suggesting ways in which a piece of research or writing could be improved.
… being against is not enough. We also need to develop habits of constructive thinking.
Edward de Bono
作為一名學術作者,你應該對所使用的資源持批判態度;這本質上意味著要對閱讀的內容有所質疑而非點頭稱是,僅因該資訊是被發布的。批判也可能意味著尋找原因,我們不應直接接受某些東西是正確或真實的;這可能需要找出作者的論點或方法存在的問題,或者可能要參考其他人對這些論點或方法的評論。極具建設性的批評透過提出改進研究或寫作的方法來予以指教。
「 ...僅僅反對是不夠的。我們還需要養成建設性思考的習慣。」
——愛德華·德·波諾,心理學家,在1960年代末期提出「水平思考」方式,改變了日常人採用「垂直思考」方式容易出現的問題。
★★★★★★★★★★★★
英文學術寫作寶典
議題介紹: http://bit.ly/2YeHhVZ
解釋因果關係: http://bit.ly/3rinvpd
比較與對比: http://bit.ly/3rXYvDX
舉例: http://bit.ly/3kf0ota
表達轉換主題的信號 1: http://bit.ly/3rgyBLI
表達轉換主題的信號 2: http://bit.ly/3l4mdMo
撰寫英文學術寫作寶典 (教學影片) Intro Video
https://youtu.be/t2WfYDQH_9U
★★★★★★★★★★★★
完整的片語詞庫大全 Complete Phrasebank:
http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/
精簡版: http://bit.ly/3i5iWuY
詞彙區別: https://bit.ly/2OJETlb
★★★★★★★★★★★★
如何用新聞學習英文: http://bit.ly/3nSvKpQ
★★★★★★★★★★★★
Make a sentence with the phrases below!
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「identify sentence」的推薦目錄:
- 關於identify sentence 在 Eric's English Lounge Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於identify sentence 在 Milton Goh Blog and Sermon Notes Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於identify sentence 在 Cy Leo 何卓彥 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於identify sentence 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於identify sentence 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於identify sentence 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於identify sentence 在 Sentence Structure identification - spacy - Stack Overflow 的評價
identify sentence 在 Milton Goh Blog and Sermon Notes Facebook 的最讚貼文
Same Throne, Different Judgments
(A Christian man stands before the judgment seat of Christ. Angels and other people look on solemnly.)
Jesus: “Tim, I see from your records that you have stolen things and watched indecent material online. You also keep frequenting the clubs and skipping church services. I sentence you to removal of hands, eyes and feet. Angels, please carry on.”
*After gouging, sawing and screaming*
Jesus: “Alright, now that you’ve received your fair punishments, here’s a golden mansion as your reward for the good that you’ve done. Welcome to eternity in New Jerusalem!” Gu
(Without eyes, hands or feet, Tim floats in his glorified body, blindly groping his way towards his new golden mansion.)
——
“For we must all be revealed before the judgment seat of Christ; that each one may receive the things in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad.” (2 Corinthians 5:10 WEB)
After reading the verse above, Christians may have some frightful imaginations like the imaginary scene I wrote above.
They are so afraid that Jesus will publicly call out their sins when its time to stand before His throne, and punish them severely for their sins.
Well-meaning believers with a genuine desire to please God misinterpret and don’t realize that all people—both believers and unbelievers, must stand before the same judgment seat of Christ, but at different times.
At the start of the Millennial reign of Christ, at the event called “The Marriage Supper of the Lamb”, believers will stand before Jesus to receive their rewards for all the good things that have done for Jesus’ sake.
There will be no punishments dealt that day. Huh? But the verse says “whether good or bad”.
Okay, listen. Jesus already took all the punishment for the bad things you have done—it was completed at the cross. He is not going to punish you because you are already forgiven and God promises to remember your sins no more.
So who will receive for the “bad” things they have done? That will happen to unbelievers. They will also stand before the same throne, but only at the end of time, at least 1000 years later.
Popularly referred to as the “Great White Throne Judgment”, it is actually Jesus sitting on the same throne as “the Judgment Seat of Christ”, but at a different time.
All unbelievers will be sentenced to eternal torment in the lake of fire based on the works they have done in their lifetime. They are the ones who will receive for the “bad” that they’ve done.
So, dear child of God, set your heart at ease. There is no punishment for you to receive when you stand before Jesus’ beautiful white throne in the future. You will only receive rewards, based on the good you have done. You can look forward to award ceremony day!
In “Sandcastles Don’t Last Forever”, you will discover the exciting and powerful truths about your eternal rewards and how judgment differs for believers and unbelievers.
Also, learn how to identify your God-given calling in life and how to step into that calling to receive the best of God’s blessings and rewards for you: https://www.ko-fi.com/s/7b9e3783ae
identify sentence 在 Cy Leo 何卓彥 Facebook 的最佳貼文
‘’Judging in the World Harmonica Festival 2017’’
Judging a high level musical competition is extremely difficult.
Music is art, but also science.
Judging a competition I would prioritise the scientific part over the artist part. Breaking down good music in a scientific way include calculating the note accuracy, rhythmic accuracy, dynamics changes, articulation (staccato, legato, accent, tenuto...etc), difficulty of the selected piece. If the contestant excel in all of the above, they are usually at the top of the chart already.
But when there are multiple players who are able to fulfil the scientific part, the ranking difference shall lies in the artistic part. Musical phrasing is one extremely prominent part. It could be a two bars phrasing, a 8 bars sentence or even the whole phrasing for the entire piece of music. Does all the small phrasing echo with each other after listening to a 8 minutes performance. Or are they disconnected and unable to convey a final general picture?
Musical style is a matter of taste. Hearing contestant performing my own composition this year certainly allows me to differentiate varies styles. Be it a technical approach like Franz Chmel, a classical approach like Wantani Yasuo, or a showy approach like myself, musical taste difference in the judicator is an inevitable form of bias. Even the most scientific judge in music has bias, because music is art. And therefore, having 5 judges of different tastes is extremely helpful in concluding a fair result. A balance was easily achieved.
As an advocate of harmonica competition, I do think because of competition, higher and higher level of harmonica players are arsing. Meanwhile it also function as an indicator for players to identify their level in the entire harmonica circle. Especially when there is no grading system for the harmonica yet. It is the most honest system we have currently to reveal every player’s’ standard.
I can’t be more excited to see more and more harmonica players in the world to shine outside of the harmonica circle when the standard keep rising.
Lastly, I appreciate every player’s who participated in the Test Piece Solo Category this year! Because of your participation, I believe it is still remaining the highest level of classical chromatic solo competition in the world currently. Once again, check out the winners this year. They are Ja Jing Lam ( TW 1st), Kelvin Leung Shing Hei (HK 2nd) and Pak Yue Leung (HK 3rd).
identify sentence 在 Sentence Structure identification - spacy - Stack Overflow 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>