The Mandarin-speaking man, calling from a number with the Hong Kong prefix +852 on Monday, was able to say the person’s name and the last four digits of his Hong Kong identity card number. However, he did not mention his role at the newspaper.
Read: https://bit.ly/33RYzuN
有《蘋果》員工今日接到顯示為「+852」的來電,當時手機已彈出警告指該電話或來自境外,接聽後對方為操普通話男子,能叫出其全名和身份證號碼最後4個字,自稱來自「國安公署」,指其涉及國安案件,再不處理便會「很麻煩」,惟未有提及他在《蘋果》的工作。
________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
同時也有27部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過12萬的網紅prasertcbs,也在其Youtube影片中提到,การสร้างคอลัมน์แบบ auto_increment ที่มีการกำหนดค่าเรียงตามลำดับ 1, 2, 3, ... ไปเรื่อย ๆ โดยอัตโนมัติ การเพิ่มข้อมูลเข้าในตาราง เพื่อแสดงให้เห็นถึงการท...
「identity number」的推薦目錄:
- 關於identity number 在 Apple Daily - English Edition Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於identity number 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於identity number 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於identity number 在 prasertcbs Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於identity number 在 prasertcbs Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於identity number 在 CarDebuts Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於identity number 在 identity numbers (KristaKingMath) - YouTube 的評價
- 關於identity number 在 Find Your Facebook Ad Account ID Number 的評價
- 關於identity number 在 Information on German Identity Card - Federal Foreign Office 的評價
identity number 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 的最佳貼文
For the record。。。
#無補充
《BBC》Hong Kong: China limits parliament to 'patriots'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-56560829
《The Guardian》Beijing cuts Hong Kong's directly elected seats in radical overhaul
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/30/hong-kong-china-brings-in-voting-system-changes
《The Times》‘Patriotic’ electoral reforms tighten China’s grip on Hong Kong
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/china-tightens-grip-on-hong-kong-with-patriotic-electoral-reforms-m7mwdx350
《The Telegraph》Beijing to vet election candidates and cut Hong Kong's directly elected seats in 'patriotic' overhaul
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/30/beijing-vet-election-candidates-cut-hong-kongs-directly-elected/
《Financial Times》Hong Kong set to allow corporate directors to obscure their identity
https://on.ft.com/3u4Uvmb
《The Washington Post》China cuts number of elected legislators in Hong Kong, delays election
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/china-hongkong-election-legislature/2021/03/30/bb1f405c-912d-11eb-aadc-af78701a30ca_story.html
《DW News》China approves Hong Kong electoral system reform bill
https://www.dw.com/en/china-approves-hong-kong-electoral-system-reform-bill/a-57046070
***************************************
每日更新乞兒兜Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
MeWe:https://mewe.com/p/goodbyehkhellouk
Twitter:@ByeHKHiUK
IG:@goodbyehkhellouk
📣最近更新:
14個國家對WHO調查報告嘅聯合聲明,有骨嘅英文
https://bit.ly/3djUns9
蘇伊士運河乜乜物物:超簡陋歷史及近況(陰謀論除外)
https://bit.ly/31ta0b5
隱藏英國民主改革開端,到今日都未完成嘅少女偵探電影
https://bit.ly/3rtKWLF
***************************************
identity number 在 Mordeth13 Facebook 的最讚貼文
Jenna Cody :
Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.
This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.
So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.
Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).
Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.
Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.
Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.
What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.
So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.
It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.
This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.
In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.
After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.
Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.
In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).
In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.
Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.
It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.
Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.
This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.
*
Now, as I said, none of this matters.
What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.
Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.
Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.
Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.
So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.
And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.
The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.
A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.
There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…
…well, that’s already settled.
The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.
Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.
If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.
identity number 在 prasertcbs Youtube 的最讚貼文
การสร้างคอลัมน์แบบ auto_increment ที่มีการกำหนดค่าเรียงตามลำดับ 1, 2, 3, ... ไปเรื่อย ๆ โดยอัตโนมัติ
การเพิ่มข้อมูลเข้าในตาราง เพื่อแสดงให้เห็นถึงการทำงานของ auto_increment
การลบทุกแถวจากตารางพร้อมกับ reset การเรียงลำดับเพื่อให้เริ่มต้นจาก 1
เชิญสมัครเป็นสมาชิกของช่องนี้ได้ที่ ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=prasertcbs
สอน MySQL ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GFmJDsZipFCrY6L-0RrBYLT
สอน PostgreSQL ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GGi_NqmIu43B-PsxA0wtnyH
สอน Microsoft SQL Server 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017 ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GH8gYuxpp-jqu5Blc7KbQVn
สอน SQLite ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GHjYJA4pfG38M5BcrWKf5s2
สอน SQL สำหรับ Data Science ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GGq8M6HO8xrpkaRhvEBsQhw
การเชื่อมต่อกับฐานข้อมูล (SQL Server, MySQL, SQLite) ด้วย Python ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GEdZtHwU3t9k3dBAlxYoq59
การใช้ Excel ในการทำงานร่วมกับกับฐานข้อมูล (SQL Server, MySQL, Access) ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GGA2sSqNRSXlw0OYuCfDwYk
#prasertcbs_SQL #prasertcbs #prasertcbs_MySQL

identity number 在 prasertcbs Youtube 的最讚貼文
0:57 การสร้างคอลัมน์แบบ serial ที่มีการกำหนดค่าเรียงตามลำดับ 1, 2, 3, ... ไปเรื่อย ๆ โดยอัตโนมัติ
2:10 การเพิ่มข้อมูลเข้าในตาราง เพื่อแสดงให้เห็นถึงการทำงานของ serial
5:10 การลบทุกแถวจากตารางพร้อมกับ reset การเรียงลำดับเพื่อให้เริ่มต้นจาก 1
ดาวน์โหลด PostgreSQL script ไฟล์ที่ใช้ในคลิปได้ที่ ► http://bit.ly/2Gc3MF4
เชิญสมัครเป็นสมาชิกของช่องนี้ได้ที่ ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=prasertcbs
สอน PostgreSQL ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GGi_NqmIu43B-PsxA0wtnyH
สอน MySQL ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GFmJDsZipFCrY6L-0RrBYLT
สอน Microsoft SQL Server 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017 ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GH8gYuxpp-jqu5Blc7KbQVn
สอน SQLite ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GHjYJA4pfG38M5BcrWKf5s2
สอน SQL สำหรับ Data Science ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GGq8M6HO8xrpkaRhvEBsQhw
การเชื่อมต่อกับฐานข้อมูล (SQL Server, MySQL, SQLite) ด้วย Python ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GEdZtHwU3t9k3dBAlxYoq59
การใช้ Excel ในการทำงานร่วมกับกับฐานข้อมูล (SQL Server, MySQL, Access) ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoTScYm9O0GGA2sSqNRSXlw0OYuCfDwYk
#prasertcbs_SQL #prasertcbs #prasertcbs_PostgreSQL

identity number 在 CarDebuts Youtube 的最佳貼文
เปิดตัว All-New Nissan Juke 2020 นิสสัน จู๊ค โฉมใหม่ล่าสุด เครื่องยนต์เบนซินเทอร์โบ 3 สูบ 1.0 ลิตร มาพร้อมระบบ ProPILOT
All-new Nissan JUKE makes its global debut in 5 cities across Europe, a market where almost 1 million JUKE have been sold since it defined the compact crossover segment 9 years ago
Sleek coupe crossover lines and an athletic stance couple with increased roominess and a modern interior to set a new design standard
New technology including Nissan ProPILOT and the NissanConnect infotainment system with In-Car WiFi, smartphone integration and over-the-air updates makes drivers' lives easier and safer
1.0-liter 3-cylinder turbocharged engine, paired with 6-speed manual or 7-speed dual-clutch transmission, delivers improved performance, fuel economy and refinement
PARIS – Almost a decade after it set the bar for compact crossovers through its distinctive personality and emphasis on fun, the next-generation Nissan JUKE arrives to reinvent the segment once again. Fun to drive as ever, the all-new JUKE delivers new levels of performance and technology, within a striking yet roomier coupe crossover body. With almost 1 million on the road in Europe, the Nissan JUKE has resonated with European customers thanks to its stand-out design. The next-generation JUKE – which was unveiled today in London, Paris, Milan, Barcelona and Cologne – appeals to European drivers, who value design, technology and performance, in addition to practicality, in the crossover segment. With ProPILOT and striking connectivity, JUKE brings Nissan Intelligent Mobility - Nissan's vision for changing how cars are powered, driven and integrated into society - one step further.
"Nissan JUKE is back with its unique identity, even more character, exciting performance and advanced technology that responds to drivers' needs," said Ponz Pandikuthira, Nissan Europe Vice President, Product Planning. "The new design and exciting driving experience will appeal to the growing number of customers opting for compact crossovers. The JUKE has grown up, while still retaining the fun-to-drive qualities that have always made it stand out."

identity number 在 Find Your Facebook Ad Account ID Number 的推薦與評價
Find Facebook Ad Account ID numbers in Ads Manager. ... Your ad account ID number is shown above the search and filter bar, in the account dropdown menu. ... <看更多>
identity number 在 Information on German Identity Card - Federal Foreign Office 的推薦與評價
Please obtain information on the functionalities of the new Identity Card prior to your application and the differences compared to the passport. German ID card. ... <看更多>
identity number 在 identity numbers (KristaKingMath) - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>