今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
job clusters 在 ลงทุนแมน Facebook 的最讚貼文
สรุปภาพรวม เศรษฐกิจ ภาคอีสาน /โดย ลงทุนแมน
ภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ หรือ “ภาคอีสาน”
เป็นภูมิภาคที่มีพื้นที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในประเทศไทย
และเป็นภูมิภาคที่มีจำนวนประชากรมากที่สุดของประเทศ
เลยทำให้ภาคอีสาน เป็นภูมิภาคที่สำคัญที่สุด ภูมิภาคหนึ่งของประเทศไทย
...Continue ReadingSummary of Northeastern Economy / Investment Man
North East or ′′ Northeast ′′
The region with the largest area in Thailand.
And the most populous region of the country
That's why the Northeastern region is the most important region of Thailand.
But did you know that the Northeastern region has GDP proportion of less than 10 % of GDP Thailand..
What about today's economic overview of the Northeastern region?
Investment man will tell you about it.
╔═══════════╗
Blockdit is a platform of source of thinkers
Helping to update the situation in video article formats
Including the podcast to listen to on the go.
Try it out at Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
First let's get to know the Northeastern region first.
Northeast or Northeast
There are over 168,854 square kilometers.
It's about 1 in 3 of Thailand's area.
Which if we compare the northeastern region to country.
Will be 200 times bigger than Singapore
Currently, the Northeastern region has an estimated population of 22 million people.
Almost 1 in 3 of the population of Thailand.
Just the northeastern region of Thailand, one sector has the same population as Cambodia and Laos all over the country.
Enough is like this if we look in terms of size, area and population.
I will see that the Northeastern region is important to Thailand.
Over the past ten years.
Economy of the Northeastern region has high expansion compared to other regions.
Rising the proportion of poor people in the Northeastern region quickly.
And also the economic structures of the Northeastern region start to change.
From farming farming, farming, it's changed to more economic outside the farming sector.
However, even the economy of the Northeastern region
There will be continued growth in the past.
But the economic value of this place still has low proportion.
Compared to Thailand's economic value.
In 2561, consolidated product value for provinces in the Northeastern region.
Aka GPP (Gross Provincial Product) is worth 1.5 trillion baht.
The value in this part is not 10 % of the GDP of Thailand's GDP, the whole country is around 17 trillion baht.
While the average per capita income of the Northeastern population is 84,000 baht per year, the least in the 6 regions of Thailand. Interesting is this number is less than the average income per capita. The population of Laos is 85,000 baht per year. ..
And compared to the average income per capita, the Thai population equals 236,000 baht.
You will see that the average income per capita population is less than the average income per capita. The Thai population is almost 3 times more.
One more interesting thing is
Even the most populous region
But it's a sector that has physician proportion to very small population, compared to Thailand's average.
population proportion to 1 doctors in 2561
Thailand has a population of 1,868 people per 1 doctors.
The Northeastern region has a proportion of population of 2,725 people per 1 doctors.
In terms of tourism sector
Even in the Northeastern region, there are many landmark attractions.
Not much money to make from travel
In 2562, the Northeastern region has 100,000 million Baht tourism income, which is proportionate to only 3 % of Thailand's tourism income.
Another interesting story is
The wealth of the Northeastern people is in 4 provinces which are called ′′ Big Four of Isan
Which consists of
1. Nakhon Ratchasima has an economic size of 296,000 million baht
2. Khon Kaen has economic size equal to 211,200 million Baht.
3. Ubon Ratchathani. Economic size is equal to 124,200 million Baht
4. Udon Thani has an economic size of 111,600 million baht.
I will see that 4 provinces are coming.
There is a combined economic value of over 743,000 million Baht.
Or nearly 50 % of the economic value of the Northeastern region.
Prosperity in the Northeastern region that clusters just a few provinces
cause the problem that follows is
Labor from the province in the northeastern region.
Must travel to work in 4 such wealthy provinces.
And some may move into a job in Bangkok for a better life opportunity.
When this happens, it makes the economy in the overview of the Northeastern region not driven to spread to each area as well.
From what you say, we will see.
Northeastern region has many advantages.
The whole matter of labour more than other regions
There are areas adjacent to neighbouring countries in Laos and Cambodia that are suitable for regional trade and border investment.
A major problem right now
How to make the northeastern economy grow even more.
And how to make Northeastern people a thoroughly better living.
At the end, if the Northeastern region has a better economy, it will make the whole Thailand economy better, according to direct and indirect..
╔═══════════╗
Blockdit is a platform of source of thinkers
Helping to update the situation in video article formats
Including the podcast to listen to on the go.
Try it out at Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
Follow the investment man at
Website - longtunman.com
Blockdit-blockdit.com/longtunman
Facebook-@[113397052526245:274: lngthun mæn]
Twitter - twitter.com/longtunman
Instagram-instagram.com/longtunman
Line - page.line.me/longtunman
YouTube - youtube.com/longtunman
References
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isan
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thailand
-https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=5628&filename=gross_regional
-https://www.car.chula.ac.th/display7.php?bib=b2156772
-https://www.creativethailand.org/article/thinktank/32362/th#the-new-isan
-http://social.nesdc.go.th/SocialStat/StatReport_FullScreen.aspx?reportid=304&template=1R2C&yeartype=M&subcatid=18
-https://mots.go.th/more_news_new.php?cid=411Translated
job clusters 在 Lee Hsien Loong Facebook 的精選貼文
We discovered an important link today between two existing COVID-19 clusters — the Grace Assembly of God church (our biggest cluster) and the Life Church and Missions church.
Cases 83 and 91 had only mild symptoms earlier, and had not been diagnosed with COVID-19. But a new serological test — which detects antibodies in the blood, instead of the virus itself — done subsequently confirmed that they had been infected earlier, and linked the two clusters together.
This breakthrough would not have been possible without close cooperation among the Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore Police Force and researchers from Duke-NUS Medical School, who developed the serological test, the world's first, here in Singapore. My thanks to all of you for a job well done!
For now, the best thing we can all do is to continue practising good hygiene, and be socially responsible — do not go to gatherings if you are feeling unwell. Together, we can beat the coronavirus. – LHL
#SGUnited