Human Rights Watch(人權監察)出咗聲明,要求特區政府推翻對和平示威者的刑責,因大家對香港的人權,基本自由的前景非常關注。
https://www.hrw.org/…/hong-kong-quash-convictions-student-l…
For Immediate Release
Hong Kong: Quash Convictions of Student Leaders
Court Ruling Could Bar Youths from Upcoming Elections
(New York, August 16, 2017) – The Hong Kong government should quash the 2016 convictions of three student leaders for their roles in a peaceful protest, Human Rights Watch said today. On August 17, 2017, the Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong is due to rule on the Hong Kong Department of Justice’s request that Alex Chow, Nathan Law, and Joshua Wong be given prison sentences.
Under Hong Kong ordinances, anyone sentenced to more than three months in prison is barred from running for the Legislative Council and for the District Council for five years.
“Hong Kong authorities should never have prosecuted these three student leaders for peaceful protests in the first place,” said Sophie Richardson, China director at Human Rights Watch. “The justice department’s outlandish application seeking jail time is not about public order but is instead a craven political move to keep the trio out of the Legislative Council, as well as deter future protests.”
On July 21, 2016, a Hong Kong court convicted Chow and Wong of unlawful assembly, and Law of incitement, offenses under the Public Order Ordinance. Chow was given a three-week sentence with a one-year suspension. Wong and Law were given community service orders of 80 hours and 120 hours, respectively, and have since fulfilled their obligations.
In October, the Hong Kong Department of Justice filed an application for a review of the sentences, an uncommon step, and now seeks prison terms for the three. The prosecutors claim that “the nature of the crime in this case is extremely serious,” and that “as the accused do not feel true remorse, awarding a sentence of community service is wrong on principle and clearly not enough.”
In an unrelated but similar case, the appeals court imposed a heavier penalty on 13 defendants who had been convicted of unlawful assembly for another anti-government protest in 2014. The 13, who had previously been sentenced to community service, were given prison terms between 8 and 13 months after the justice department sought a review of their sentences.
The charges against the three student leaders stem from their leadership of a peaceful sit-in that triggered the 79-day pro-democracy Umbrella Movement in 2014. At that time, Hong Kong authorities characterized the demonstrations as illegal, invoking the Public Order Ordinance, which has been criticized by the United Nations Human Rights Committee for possibly “facilitat[ing] excessive restrictions” to basic rights. The law, which requires that processions involving more than 30 people and assemblies with more than 50 must apply for and receive a “letter of no objection” from the government in advance, is incompatible with article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which applies to Hong Kong.
Human Rights Watch has long urged Hong Kong authorities to revise the ordinance to comply with the ICCPR.
Imposing new punishments on Wong and Law, who had already completed their sentences of community service, may violate article 14(7) of the ICCPR, which enunciates the principle of “double jeopardy” that no one shall be “punished again” for the same offense.
In November 2016 and July 2017, Hong Kong courts disqualified a total of six elected pro-democratic legislators. The court decisions were based on a November 2016 judicial interpretation issued by China’s National People’s Congress Standing Committee, changing Hong Kong’s functional constitution during legal proceedings. As a result, pro-democracy voices in Hong Kong’s semi-democratic legislature lost their limited power to reject motions and bill amendments raised by other legislators. The Hong Kong government is expected to organize a by-election for the six vacated seats. At least two of the three student leaders had expressed interest in running for these seats.
Human Rights Watch has documented the surge in politically motivated prosecutions against Hong Kong’s pro-democracy leaders since the Umbrella Movement protests culminated in December 2014. Most were charged with participating in or leading peaceful protests. Human Rights Watch has also documented other forms of official harassment against opposition politicians, such as delays and rejections in registering political parties on political grounds. There were also increased reports of suspected mainland security police following, intimidating, and assaulting democracy advocates, particularly during Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to Hong Kong from June 29 to July 1, 2017.
“People are increasingly losing confidence in the neutrality of Hong Kong’s justice system,” Richardson said. “Hong Kong authorities should quash the convictions of peaceful protesters that have raised serious concerns about the long-term prospect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong.”
For more Human Rights Watch reporting on China, Hong Kong, and Tibet, please visit:
https://www.hrw.org/asia/china-and-tibet
For more information, please contact:
In Washington, DC, Sophie Richardson (English, Mandarin): +1-202-612-4341; or +1-917-721-7473 (mobile); or richars@hrw.org. Twitter: @SophieHRW
In Hong Kong, Maya Wang (English, Mandarin): +852-8170-1076 (mobile); or wangm@hrw.org. Twitter: @wang_maya
If you would rather not receive future communications from Human Rights Watch, let us know by clicking here.
Human Rights Watch, 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118-0110 United States
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
judicial council forms 在 許秀雯 律師 Facebook 的精選貼文
The Struggle for LGBT Rights in Taiwan, A Discussion with Victoria Hsu
Speaker: Victoria Hsu
Date: 9 June 2016 Time: 1:00 PM
Finishes: 9 June 2016Time: 3:00 PM
Venue: Russell Square: College Buildings Room: KLT(University of London)
Type of Event: Seminar
Abstract
The development of LGBT Rights in Taiwan in recent years can be explained in the following aspects:
1. Legislative: Two bills proposing marriage equality were raised in Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan in 2012 and 2013. The bill proposed in 2013 was drafted by the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights (TAPCPR). Victoria Hsu was the principal author of TAPCPR’s bill. This version of the bill aims to give any two people, regardless of gender, sexual orientation or gender identity, equal rights to marriage, as well as to allow same-sex spouses to adopt children. These two bills passed the first reading in the Legislative Yuan, but despite the fact that opinion polls show that more than half of the people of Taiwan support these bills, they continue to be vigorously opposed by several religious organizations.
2. Judicial: The TAPCPR’s legal team maintains that the Civil Code’s prohibition of same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. Therefore, on 20 August 2015, the TAPCPR lawyers led by Victoria Hsu have applied for a constitutional interpretation from the Council of Justices on behalf of Mr. Qiu Jia-Wei. The TAPCPR has also initiated three other administrative lawsuits in connection with marriage equality cases since 2014.
3. Participation in politics by LGBT organizations and organizations opposing LGBT rights: In the 2016 general elections, organizations both supporting and opposing LGBT rights are engaging in the elections as a means toward achieving their desired ends. Victoria Hsu was an openly lesbian candidate of the Green Party/Social Democratic Party alliance, running for the position of legislator-at-large. This is a new situation worth analyzing for Taiwan society.
4. Local Governments: There have been many changes over the past two years among some of the local city and county governments in Taiwan. These include allowing same-sex partners to participate in collective weddings held by city governments, allowing same-sex partners to register with the household registry, and even advocating that same-sex partners have the right to sign surgical consent forms. The Taipei City government has, moreover, petitioned the Council of Justices to issue a constitutional interpretation regarding whether or not same-sex partners can marry.
5. Other: With regard to LGBT rights, Taiwan already has had some achievements and continues to proactively push for further progress. These areas include the laws and policies in connection with the prevention of domestic violence, the Anti-discrimination Laws, the changes to the legal gender, and the implementation of LGBT inclusive education in the curriculum of middle schools and elementary schools.
Speaker's Bio
Victoria Hsu is Co-founder and CEO of Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights (TAPCPR) which is one of the most important lgbt organizations in Taiwan. Victoria is Attorney-at-Law (admitted in Taiwan in 1999) and PhD candidate in the Faculty of Law at Université Paris X (France). She has two Master of Law degrees from the Université Strasbourg III (France) and from National Taipei University (Taiwan). She was also an openly lesbian candidate in Taiwan’s 2016 legislative election.
Victoria Hsu will also be speaking at the Queer Asia Conference at SOAS on 11 June 2016
https://queerasia2016.wordpress.com/schedule/
Organiser: Centre of Taiwan Studies
Contact email: bc18@soas.ac.uk
http://www.soas.ac.uk/taiwanstudies/events/09jun2016-the-struggle-for-lgbt-rights-in-taiwan-a-discussion-with-victoria-hsu.html