關於 simply the best中文 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

熱愛中文流行音樂的朋友看過來！🎤🎹🥁🎸
今天的插班生好介紹要介紹大家這個好地方
Simply Live by Tin Box!

除了是餐廳以外，這裡有也 LIVE music!
We finally got to check this place out and had a good catch up our old (young) friend, JR, drummer + band leader of the resident band.
And 我們聊著聊著就忍不住和超專業的Tin Box band 現場即興 jam了一下 🎵

Members of Tin Box can “Pay-As-You-Wish” for food and drinks at any Tin Box outlets and the best part?
Membership is FREE! (走過路過千萬不要錯過！)

感謝 Simply Live by Tin Box 的邀請和招待！
期待很快可以 jio 朋友再次光顧，讓他們也來體驗一下不一樣的Live！

Shoutouts to:
Hair: Ryan Yap
Makeup: Shaun Lee

(Video shot in line with safety measures)

#SimplyLive #LiveExperiences #TinBoxCulture #Mandopop #SP #插班生 #TheFreshman #ChaBanSheng #CBS

一封給國家地理頻道「Dog: Impossible」節目負責人的公開信:

An open letter to the leadership team of Nat Geo Wild Dog Impossible:

Translate: Yu-Hwa Su 翻譯: 蘇昱華
Proof: Yen Ke 校對: 葛雁

The International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants (IAABC) applauds National Geographic’s mission to offer intelligent, relevant and captivating non-fiction entertainment. This is a crucial objective, especially as an introduction to children and viewers largely relying on television for their scientific information.
國際動物行為諮詢師協會（IAABC）對於國家地理頻道致力於提供電視觀眾正確知識與科學內容表示讚賞。這是一個非常重要的目標，特別是對依賴電視得到這些知識的兒童與其他觀眾們來說。

However, your stated mission is in direct conflict with your show Dog: Impossible. In fact, the irresponsible treatment of the dogs and people on this show flies in the face of all best practices in animal training and behavior. Rather than promoting science and scientifically-proven methodology, Dog: Impossible sacrifices learning science for more dramatic television.
然而，貴頻道所提供的節目「Dog: Impossible」卻與貴頻道「提供正確的科學知識」的一貫立場衝突。節目中對犬隻以及飼主的不負責處理方式與應有的動物訓練及行為操作的準則相違背。「Dog: Impossible」並沒有提倡科學以及經科學驗證的方法，這節目犧牲了對科學的學習，轉而追求吸睛的電視節目效果。

Matt Beisner appears to have no credentials or education in training and behavior, yet he refers to himself as a behaviorist. His claim that “energy is the one language that every animal on the planet speaks” makes clear he is not one.
Matt Beisner並沒有動物訓練或行為學的相關學習經歷與證照，卻宣稱自己是一位行為學家。從他的主張：「能量是地球上所有動物都會使用的共通語言」，便能明白他並不是行為學家。

His statement, “You don’t need tricks, you don’t need treats, you don’t need force,” shows just how unaware of his own actions he is. His misuse of scientific terminology leads viewers to believe they are learning demonstrated, safe and accepted strategies in helping their dogs. In fact, Mr. Beisner is forcing these dogs from start to finish of each episode. His own “tricks” are that of over-stressing dogs until they’re in a state referred to in psychology and science as “learned helplessness.”
他主張「你不需要技巧、零食、或蠻力 (去訓練狗)」，這顯示出他對於自己的所做所為一無所知。他對科學術語的濫用也會誤導觀眾，讓觀眾以為他們正在學習經證實有效而且安全可接受的方法來幫助狗狗。但這位訓練師在每一集節目上從頭到尾都是在逼迫這些狗，而他所擁有的「技巧」，就是讓狗進入過度緊迫的狀態，直到牠們進入心理學和科學上所指的「習得無助」（learned helplessness）狀態。

Learned helplessness occurs when a subject endures repeated aversive stimuli beyond their control. Originally thought to show a subject's acceptance of their powerlessness, for more than half a century it’s been known instead to be the emotional “shutting down” of the subject. Anxiety, clinical depression, and related mental illnesses are common consequences of this technique in humans.
「習得無助」發生在動物沒有任何控制權，且重複地被施加嫌惡刺激的時候。最初，人們認為習得無助狀態意味著動物「接受」了自身無法改變、無能為力的情形，超過半個世紀以來，人們認為這是動物情緒「關機（shutting down）」的表現。在人類身上，習得無助的常見結果包含焦慮、憂鬱症、以及相關的心理疾病。

Allow us to note some aspects of the trailer and his shows, but first, to point out a few well-documented and commonly understood aspects of dog behavior so that we may better make our points understood.
在我們解釋為何我們認為此節目的預告片與內容不適當之前，我們希望先闡述一些正確的犬隻行為常識，以便您能更理解我們的觀點。

Canine body language indicating stress and severe stress:
顯示出壓力以及嚴重緊迫的犬隻肢體語言：

Compressed bodies
Dry, raspy panting
Wide, open eyes with dilated pupils
Heavy drooling
“Whipping” head and body back, pushing off a handler in order to get away
Growling
Fighting
Biting
縮緊身體
急促的喘氣
睜大雙眼、散瞳
大量流口水
甩頭、用前爪推抱著狗的人以退後、試圖掙脫
低吼
打架
開咬

Eleven seconds into the trailer, Mr. Beisner rubs his hands together, smiling, and says, “This is going to be gnarly.” All professionals know from that statement what the series will spotlight: A poorly (if at all) educated non-professional pushing dogs way beyond therapeutic limits, in the name of “results.”
在預告片11秒的地方，Beisner先生搓手並笑著說「等一下會很精采喔」。所有專業人士都知道這句話代表這個節目的亮點將會是：一名缺乏適當教育的訓練師，逼迫狗到超過其能承受的極限，並把這樣的結果稱為是良好的改善。

Flooding, the term for inundating a subject with their fears, phobias and triggers, is ethically questionable at best, cruel and unnecessary, always. There's also a common danger of spontaneous recovery of the phobia. This is because flooding doesn't replace the fear-response with a different response, it just replaces it with no response. “No response” is simply suppression, not cure.
「洪水法」，指的是故意將動物置於恐慌或恐懼的觸發刺激情境，這樣的方法不道德、殘忍、而且沒必要。另外，恐懼的自發性回復（spontaneous recovery）也是洪水法常見的風險，這是因為洪水法並沒有將害怕的反應重新制約成其他不同的情緒行為，它只是讓動物沒有反應。「沒有反應」只是壓抑，動物並沒有因此感到不害怕或恐慌。

Throughout the trailer dogs are flooded with aversive stimuli such as other dogs, people and equipment, something an ethical professional would not, and could not do per any answerable guidelines of animal training and behavior care.
在整個預告片中，狗狗被迫接受各種嫌惡刺激的洪水法訓練，例如其他狗、其他人類和物品，這是具有道德的專業訓練人員不會做的，任何負責任的動物訓練及行為照護準則也不會如此建議。

Systematic desensitization and counterconditioning, gradual exposure to the feared object, and replacement of a negative emotional association with a more pleasant one, are the recommended techniques used to treat such fear and aggression cases, per all legitimate veterinary, training and behavior organizations.
系統性減敏與反制約，也就是逐步與少量的讓狗接觸其本來會害怕的事物，並且將引發的少量負面情緒與其非常喜愛的事物配對給予，是用來處理恐懼及攻擊案例的建議方法，也是每個好的獸醫師、訓練及行為機構會推薦的方法。

Beisner’s statement that “We know at the Zen Yard that dogs help other dogs come out of their shell and face their fear and get past their aggression” isn’t just scientifically unsupportable, his words ring hollow during the very scene playing while he says those words: Beisner restraining one dog, while his co-host pulls a leashed dog to the first in a completely unnatural gesture perhaps intended to either mimic natural dog greeting (it doesn’t) or to flood the heavily drooling dog who is unable to move or get away. The dogs end up in a fight. They have been set up to fail, and the outcome is inevitable.
Beisner宣稱「我們在Zen Yard（他的訓練中心）知道狗會去幫助其他狗融入外界、面對牠們的恐懼並且克服攻擊行為」，這句話不只是缺乏科學支持，在影片中他講出這句話時搭配的畫面，亦表現出他的說詞缺乏支持：Beisner限制了第一隻狗的行動，由節目的共同主持人以牽繩將另一隻狗以一個完全不自然的姿勢拉到第一隻狗身邊，他們可能是在試著模仿狗狗自然的社交打招呼行為（但並不是），或使用洪水法訓練那隻狂流口水（顯示牠很緊張）並且無法逃脫的狗。最終兩隻狗打起來，訓練師製造的這個情境，讓失敗的結果無可避免。

In the trailer, the assistant host, Stefanie DiOrio, states, “Nervousness can easily turn to fear which can lead to aggression.” This is an accurate statement, which is why it’s so confusing that the entire show would be predicated on pushing dogs to the very edge of survivable stress and into predictable aggression, doubling down on the issues that their owners are struggling with.
在預告片中，節目的共同主持人Stefanie DiOrio說「緊張不安很容易變成真正的恐懼，並且導致攻擊行為」，這句話是正確的，但也讓人更加困惑為何整個節目的走向都在將狗推向牠們所能承受壓力的極限、觸發根本可預測的攻擊行為、並使飼主所面對的問題加倍惡化。

We know that the dramatic changes in behavior, from stressed and wildly aggressive to “calm” dogs, make for compelling TV. To an average pet owner it looks like these dogs are making huge improvements. All clients just want their dog to “Stop being aggressive.” However, we also know that behavior suppression is not the same as behavior modification, that a stressed and shut-down dog is a more dangerous animal than one who is actively showing aggression, and that the long-term prognosis of this kind of intervention is poor for both the client and their dog.
我們知道行為上戲劇性的變化，從一隻緊迫且兇猛攻擊的狗轉變成“冷靜”的狗，這個過程代表了高收視率，在不十分了解行為學的飼主眼中看來，這些狗狗似乎有巨大的進步。飼主都只是希望他們的狗「不要再有攻擊性」，然而我們也知道單純抑制攻擊行為的出現，並不是真正的行為改善技術。舉例來說一隻高壓力但看似沒有反應的狗，遠比一隻會表現出攻擊性的狗要危險許多 (譯註: 因為這樣的狗可能會沒有徵兆地開咬)，因此這種抑制攻擊行為的訓練法，以長遠來看對飼主以及狗狗都是有害的。

It is also worth pointing out that, like his predecessor, Mr Beisner’s assessment of cause for much of the issues he’s asked to address is simple, made especially clear in episode 4 where he not only saves a dog, he “saves a marriage:” Women are unable to effectively lead, must be stronger, must change their ways.
另一個值得注意的事是Beisner先生，如同他在同一個頻道的前輩，西薩，對導致問題的原因評估也過於簡化，例如第四集中他聲稱他不只拯救了狗狗，他還「拯救了這段婚姻」，因為女主人無法有效的領導狗狗，因此她必須更堅強，必須改變他們之間的相處模式。

Misogyny, it seems, cures dog behavior problems. Real exploration and explanation regarding the antecedents and consequences around behaviors are ignored in favor of client blaming.
這段貶抑女性的解釋，看起來似乎能改善犬隻的行為問題，然而關於行為問題真正的前因後果卻被指責客戶所取代，並沒有真正的被探討與解釋。

The clients on the show represent thousands of clients throughout the US and beyond with whom we work every day, helping them to help their dogs. Far from being dogs “other people won’t work with,” the dogs on your show are exactly the clients and dogs that IAABC Certified Dog Behavior Consultants, as well as all members of the American College of Veterinary Behaviorists, Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists, and other certified behavior specialists see and successfully work with every day.
節目中所出現的客戶正代表了我們日常工作中所會幫助的人們與他們的狗，呈現的就是我們在美國跟其他國家的上千位客戶。節目中所出現的這些有著行為問題的狗絕對不是「其他訓練師都不想要處理的狗狗」，事實上這些客戶與狗正是IAABC認證的狗行為諮詢師、美國獸醫行為學家、認證的應用動物行為學家或是其他受認證的行為學專家，每天工作的日常。

We do so using the best practices of our field (see https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/), adopted by the leading behavior and training organizations, without psychologically or physically harming the animals we work with.
我們在這個領域也使用最嚴謹的訓練師專業道德守則（英文版參見https://m.iaabc.org/about/ethics/，中文版參見https://reurl.cc/72eVkl），這個守則受領先的行為及訓練機構所採用，使訓練師與行為諮詢師在工作時，不對我們經手的動物造成生理或心理上的傷害。

The IAABC urges Nat Geo WILD to stop promoting this public miseducation. The tactics employed in the name of entertainment are unnecessarily harsh and potentially dangerous to the public, and they teach yet another generation of Nat Geo watchers absolutely incorrect and harmful practices.
IAABC呼籲國家地理頻道（Nat Geo WILD）停止傳播此系列誤導公眾的資訊。以娛樂包裝節目的策略對於觀眾是不必要的粗糙而且有潛在風險的，甚至是向頻道的年輕一代觀眾灌輸完全不正確且有害的做法。

It remains a mystery why your network is so intent on harming dogs. After years of Cesar Milan, to now bring in a man equally unskilled, who equates terrified, angry or entrapped dogs to his own addiction history is remarkable. Are we really satisfied conflating ego with compassion, self-focus with an understanding of animal behavior? Is this the “science” your mission stands for?
我們仍然不知為何貴頻道這麼多年來如此堅持持續傷害狗的這些作為。在西薩 (Cesar Milan) 的節目播映多年之後，現在又引進一個同樣缺乏正確訓練技巧，以自身藥物成癮困擾歷史去錯誤的同理恐懼或憤怒的狗的人。我們能接受一個膨脹自我，而非真正擁有同情心、適當自我聚焦、了解動物行為的「專業人士」嗎？這就是貴節目所宣稱的「科學」立場嗎？

The damage Nat Geo is doing to dogs by choosing this type of programming is astounding. We can only assume that the producers are unaware of this, as it’s hard to imagine such harm and cruelty would be deliberate.
國家地理頻道選擇製作這類節目對於狗狗的傷害甚鉅，我們只能假定節目製作人並沒有意識到這點，因為我們難以想像會有人故意去做這樣有害且殘忍的事情。

Would you show a reality program on heart surgery with a photogenic “self-taught” practitioner, simply stating the star was not a doctor before showing him mutilating a real patient?
想問貴節目是否會採用一個上鏡的“自學”外科醫生錄製心臟手術的實境節目，告知觀眾他並非真正的醫生，然後播放他對病患動刀的畫面？

I leave you with the clearest image of suffering and abuse from your trailer: the Aussie, stressed to the breaking point, thick ropes of drool streaming from its mouth, being choked by a slip lead to compensate for the host’s inability to even effectively muzzle a dog. This dog is at the point of collapse. This dog is being tortured, and that is not hysteria. That is an assessment by any educated measure.
作為結尾，我希望指出貴節目預告片中明確顯示出狗狗受苦或受虐的畫面：那隻澳洲牧羊犬已經瀕臨壓力的極限，您可以看到口水掛在其嘴邊 (大量口水為壓力徵兆)，口罩因為沒有確實的配戴而滑脫，導致牠被勒到快要窒息，已在崩潰邊緣。具備專業與適當教育的人員指出，這隻狗因在節目上被虐待而情緒崩潰，並非其本身歇斯底里。

Please stop this cruel and dangerous programming. To do otherwise is to support that self-taught heart surgery and all the consequences it would bring; that this show is currently bringing to families struggling with their dogs.
Professionals refer to Cesar Milan’s influence on dog training as “job security” because so many dogs ruined or made far worse by his teachings are brought to us by well-intentioned, often weeping owners desperate for real help. Often it is too late.
請停止這系列殘酷且危險的節目。否則貴節目就等同於支持前面舉例的自學的心臟外科「醫師」進行手術一樣，這些危險的後果正由觀眾與他們的狗承擔。專業訓犬人士將西薩米蘭對訓犬的影響戲稱為「工作保障」，因為太多飼主使用了他教授的技巧後，狗狗的狀況變得更糟，而哭著迫切尋找真正的協助，此時通常都為時已晚。

We do not want more work due to this same phenomenon.
我們不想要因為這個節目帶來類似影響而接到更多工作。

We’d be happy to provide you with any education and resources you need to inform your producers about what would qualify as responsible, effective, safe and thoughtful work with the same “red zone” dogs you sell so well.
但我們很樂意提供貴頻道任何需要的教育與資源，讓您們的節目製作人對訓犬工作應有的品質有所理解，例如負責、有效、安全，並且理解到對於在節目中出現的這些「危險」犬隻，事實上有更合理的訓練方法。

Thank you for your consideration.
謝謝您的閱讀與理解。

Marjie Alonso
Executive Director, IAABC
For the Board of Directors

Marjie Alonso
IAABC執行長
代表董事會發言

【謎底揭曉】在台灣丟一顆石頭都會打中瞎譯那話兒！

（那話兒：表示不正當或不雅的事。小說中常指人的性器官而言。也作「那樁兒」。）

繼教授譯者謝瑤玲把「現代的祕教者窮得很」(don't have two pennies to rub together)譯成「現代的祕教者並沒有兩根可以搓在一起的陰莖」(two penises)，繼教授譯者賴慈芸把「等文稿定案後，再找譯者來翻譯也不遲。」(after the job is done, fetch the translator)譯成「翻完之後，不要給譯者留活口」(after the job is done, kill the translator)之後，實在很難找到可以與之匹敵的胡譯瞎譯，直到最近，為了研究中英譯者如何處理「共匪」的英譯，為了暸解中譯「共匪」對應的英文原文是啥，竟然發現無敵的「丟一顆石頭……打中他那話兒」！

原文/中譯對照如下，應該有足夠的上下文讓有興趣一探究竟的讀者瞧瞧這誤會是怎麼發生的，歸納三個原因：
* 譯者想像力過於旺盛、
* 恍神或不用心，見樹不見林、
* 對原文文法不夠暸解，態度不對而輕忽之。

首先，「丟一顆石頭」的原文是 lob one （發射一個那個東西），那個東西指什麼？從原文脈絡明顯指向前兩句才剛剛說過的 tactical nuclear bombs （戰術核子武器），即使不說「發射一顆戰術核彈」，嫌太累贅，至少要譯成「發射一顆核彈」。

核彈怎會變石頭？譯者顯然查字典或Google了一下，發現動詞 lob （丟、投擲、發射）和 stone 還蠻常一起出現吧？！就給它「丟一顆石頭」下去了，用這種方式理解英文是不行的，one 必須指涉出現過的名詞概念，不然，one 也有「一個人」之意，但顯然「投擲/發射一個人到廁所」根本見鬼，所以譯者可能採取「消去法」，認定這one一定是個「東西」不是人，但也輪不到「石頭」來當the one啊！

其次，「打中他那話兒」的原文是 make sure I hit it，這裡跟前述的 one 一樣，有一個代名詞 it，同樣的，譯者又是對文法不夠尊重，想像力旺盛，從廁所就聯想到男人的那話兒，於是 it 就譯成「his private parts」（他那話兒），準備千古流芳了！但是各位有沒有注意到這個「解法」的矛盾和問題？中文「他那話兒」有一個「他」，他只能代表人，那這個他指涉誰？原文完全沒有出現「他」。譯者該不會希望讀者可以看出他的用意：用擬人法的譬喻，借用「男廁裡，他的那話兒」表達「克里姆林宮的機要位置」？這未免太扯，不太可能吧！這個 it 也指剛剛提過的東西，就是男廁嘛！

建議改譯：

……他曾說自己想要「發射一顆核彈瞄準克里姆林宮的男廁，而且一定要擊中」。

感謝幾位網友參與猜謎遊戲，請自行比對看看你猜中了多少。

這個寧可發揮天馬行空的想像力，也不要按部就班遵循基本英文文法思考所導致的爆笑誤譯，跟賴教授「不要給譯者留活口」的驚世之語，頗有異曲同工之妙：兩人皆是「語不驚人誓不休」（這正好也是書名）！

這樁兒事得來的教訓：

1. 把心用在理解原文和文法，這是翻譯首要的基本功，沒有之一，沒有替代的捷徑。Cue 一下賴教授。

2. 想像力無法控制，很危險，一定要謹記你的角色在哪，不要逾矩。

3. 再好的譯者（如這位陳信宏，中文文筆極佳，我注意欣賞已久，算是英倫哲學才子作家Alan de Botton的「欽定」譯者）都必定有盲點，都一定會出包。所以，任何翻譯都應該找有能力對照原文審核者來過目一次。這是對台灣出版社最衷心的建議。

- - - - -

//Goldwater, in his heart, believed that he was right. Right about the waste and distaste of the “welfare state” the Johnson administration had built. Right about the need for absolute military strength in the face of Soviet expansion. Right about a foreign policy that would make George Bush’s look downright friendly.
高華德內心深信自己是對的。他認為詹森政府建立的「福利國家」不僅揮霍資源，而且令人厭惡；他認為美國面對蘇聯的擴張，必須建構絕對的軍事實力；而且，他心目中的外交政策強硬至極，與他相比，連小布希都顯得太過友善。

Yes, Goldwater was an extremist and proud of it. His Republican convention acceptance speech is best remembered for the line “I would remind you that extremism in defense of liberty is no vice.”
的確，高華德是個極端主義者，並且以此為傲。他在共和黨代表大會上發表的接受提名演說當中，最令人難忘的一句話就是：「提醒各位，為了捍衛自由而採行的極端主義並非壞事。」

On the subject of foreign policy he was crystal clear about where he would lead the nation. Simply put: leave the United Nations and never look back, break off all relations with the Soviet Union, and use tactical nuclear bombs to fight communists in Vietnam and other Commie strongholds. Not surprisingly, many of his proclamations during the campaign were outrageous. He was quoted as saying he’d like to “lob one into the men’s room of the Kremlin and make sure I hit it.”
在外交政策方面，他清楚表明自己將會把國家帶往什麼方向。簡單說，就是毫不留戀地退出聯合國，斷絕與蘇聯的一切關係，並且利用戰術核子武器攻打越共以及其他共匪巢穴。不出意料，他在選戰期間提出的許多宣言都令人震驚。據傳他曾說自己很想「丟一顆石頭到克里姆林宮的男廁裡，打中他那話兒」。

Small wonder Johnson’s only concern was the extent of the landslide to come. The Democrats quickly seized upon Goldwater’s “let’s nuke ’em when we have the chance” philosophy and came up with their own unofficial slogan to counter “In Your Heart You Know He’s Right.” Their retort: “In Your Guts You Know He’s Nuts.” It didn’t stop there. Bumper stickers appeared with “Goldwater for Halloween” and “Vote for Goldwater and Go to War.”
難怪詹森不怕落敗，只怕贏得不夠多。民主黨緊抓高華德「一有機會就用核彈炸翻他們」的想法，故意惡搞他的口號：「你心知肚明這傢伙瘋了。」不只如此，當時還出現了不少保險桿貼紙，內容包括：「一票投給高華德，天天都是萬聖節」或者「想上戰場，就選高華德」。

To top it all off, the Johnson advertising team created the famous “Daisy” commercial. It showed a little girl plucking petals from a daisy as a nuclear countdown ends in a huge mushroom cloud explosion. President Johnson’s voiceover was, roughly, “vote for me or God help us all.”
此外，詹森的宣傳團隊還攝製了著名的「雛菊」廣告。畫面上只見一名小女孩在核彈攻擊倒數的同時拔著一朵雛菊的花瓣，倒數結束後，隨即轟然出現爆炸後的巨大蕈狀雲。詹森總統的旁白大致上是說：「請投我一票，不然只好祈求上帝保佑了。」//

#對照原文審校翻譯不可少

This stir fry chicken with broccoli is a super easy dish which you can prepare in about 20 mins. Cook this on a lazy day to make a complete meal along with some rice. Yummy!

中文版视频 https://youtu.be/nQoAaN4i8aA

Refer to the ingredient list below or go to our website http://spicenpans.com/chicken-broccoli/ here
for your easy reference.

We would like to give special thanks to Shogun by La Gourmet for letting us try out their high quality non-stick pan in the video. If you like to buy them, you can go to any of the major departmental stores in Singapore such as Isetan, Robinsons, Takashimaya, BHG, OG, Metro or Tangs.

Hope you can recreate this yummy dish in the comfort of your home. Thanks for dropping by our channel.

Please subscribe to stay tuned to our home cooking videos.

Follow us on:
Youtube: www.youtube.com/spicenpans
Facebook www.facebook.com/spicenpans/
Instagram www.instagram/spicenpans
Blog: www.spicenpans.com

Chat with us! info@spicenpans.com

Thanks for watching! See you soon.

xoxo
Jamie
on behalf of Spice N’ Pans

Ingredients:
Serves 3 - 4 pax

1 skinless chicken thigh - sliced thinly
1 tablespoon of light soya sauce
1 egg white
1.5 tablespoons of cornflour
1 whole carrot - sliced thinly
1 stalk of broccoli
2 slices of ginger
3 cloves of garlic - chopped
2 tablespoons of oyster sauce
0.5 cup of water
0.5 tablespoon of sesame oil
A few dashes of white pepper
0.5 tablespoon of dark soya sauce
Some cornstarch solution
1 tablespoon of Chinese cooking wine (Shaoxing Huatiao wine)

-----
Looking for some of the things or ingredients we used in this video but not residing in Singapore? We welcome you for a vacation in Singapore or simply click one of these links to see similar or substitute products on Amazon. Happy shopping!

Granite Wok Pan: https://amzn.to/2yblXGJ
Oyster Sauce: https://amzn.to/2sZ8FIj
Low Sodium Light Soya Sauce: https://amzn.to/2JPnyn3
Dark Soya Sauce: https://amzn.to/2MpSBr4
Sesame Oil: https://amzn.to/2takLOa
Shaoxing wine aka Chinese cooking wine: https://amzn.to/2JNa4rS

---
If you like this recipe, you might like these too:

How to Stir Fry the Perfectly Tender Beef with Broccoli
https://youtu.be/5t3SrWk74L0

Easy Chinese 30 Minute Recipe: Three Cup Chicken 三杯鸡 (San Bei Ji): https://youtu.be/_TPSniobhow

Secret Recipe For The Best Sesame Oil Chicken 麻油鸡: https://youtu.be/AQf7aRnvG0A

Disclaimer:
Spice N' Pans is not related to these products and cannot guarantee the quality of the products in the links provided. Links are provided here for your convenience. We can only stand by the brands of the products we used in the video and we highly recommend you to buy them. Even then, preference can be subjective. Please buy at your own risk. Some of the links provided here may be affiliated. These links are important as they help to fund this channel so that we can continue to give you more recipes. Cheers!

2015年9月19日, 台北~! DAY 01
Editing heavily inspired by Casey Neistat. If you don't know who he is... you should check it out... simply the best filmmaker on YouTube.


▼JASON的Instagram
http://instagram.com/hunggy9527

▼你有咩想見到JASON做？向JASON下挑戰書吧！
http://goo.gl/forms/DXfVLR9eBn

Music used in this video:
https://soundcloud.com/yourrapbeatstv/jethale-beats-summer-happy