Don’t Be Naive! Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is Standing on the Side Against Human Civilization
Peaceful world order after WWII had been established upon the philosophy worshiping multilateralism. The cultural basis supporting such multilateralism contained an imagination believing in the ultimate good of the respect for diversity.
The Rise of China and the Naivete of EU
However, as time progressed into the Post-Cold War era of the 90's, globalization in trade became the dominant trend. Following the global embrace of multilateralism and respect for diversity, it was believed that China would have been influenced by open and positive values once she had participated in this big family of global trade. Indeed, China took advantage of its role as the "world factory" and gained a huge economic leap forward. After China joined the WTO in 2000, within seventeen to eighteen years, China had grown nine-fold compared in terms of its aggregate economic volume. Furthermore, it surpassed Germany in 2005 and Japan between 2009 and 2010, becoming the second-largest economy in the world.
In particular, due to the global financial crisis derived from the subprime mortgage in 2007 and Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy in 2008 in the United States, the PIGGS countries turned into victims in Europe. China thus took advantage of this crisis to expand its power, bridging China’s role as depicted in Hu JinTao's "China's peaceful rise" to that in Xi JinPing's "China dream." Finally, China has revealed its ambition to compete for the position as a world leader and a planner of a new world order. The United States has finally, recently woken up to this nightmare of Xi, who has long intended to use China's almighty economic power to achieve his political agenda and hegemony. Unfortunately, many EU countries who consider themselves as advanced, civilized, pro-human rights and respectful to diversification, such as Germany and France, still fail, or refuse, to see the CCP regime’s true color and remain extremely naive towards it.
Repulsion towards Vulgarity, Tolerance towards Violence
Ironically, the two leading EU countries, Germany and France, prefer a dictatorial emperor, Xi, over Trump elected by the Americans with their ballots. The two countries do not shy away from showing them disgusted by Trump’s vulgar behaviors, but reluctantly show intolerance towards Xi’s cruelty and dictatorship. As a result, the EU countries develop inconceivable and mysterious stubbornness: they loudly criticize countries practicing death penalty based on their own judicial system; however, they are generous and subdued when it comes to the violence happening in HongKong where the HongKong police and Chinese GongAn basically bypass all applicable, or reasonable, laws. We should find this contrast deeply disturbing.
Seeing CCP through the eyes of Mao
In fact, these european countries and the western world are deluded by the so-called “respect for diversity.” Let’s use the wisdom of the CCP’s spiritual leader, Mao Ze Dong, as a framework to rethink this diversity concept in civilization. In his work “Correct Handling of Contradictions Between People,” published in 1957, Mao clearly classified social contradictions into “contradictions of two different natures”: “contradictions between ourselves and the enemy” and “internal contradictions among the people”. Contradictions between ourselves and the enemy are antagonistic, for example the contradictions between the exploiting and the exploited classes; but contradictions among people is non-antagonistic. Therefore, the former can not be mediated and resolved, but the latter one can be. Mao further advocated that contradictions between ourselves and the enemy should be resolved by dictatorship, but contradictions between the people should be resolved by a method of “cooperation-criticism-cooperation.” In other words, incompatible contradictions between ourselves and the enemy can only be solved by suppression, but internal contradictions can be softened by cooperation.
Civilization and CCP - Two Incompatible Conflicting Systems
It is time for us to recognize that CCP, a sovereign of authoritarianism and digital dictatorship, should not have been regarded as a representation of the diversity of human civilization. Diversity should be defined based on a founded premise, i.e., a premise confined with certain agreements and consensus, necessary and beneficial for composing diversity. In fact, the value CCP stands for is against the universally accepted values of the world, just like the “incompatible contradictions between ourselves and the enemy”, as Mao said. As long as the existence of the CCP regime continues, human civilization will continue to be persecuted. It can be seen in the current situation of Hong Kong, where China approved the new bill of national security, thereby destroying the remaining freedom guaranteed to Hong Kongers, and assigned the “secret” police gangs to enforce the so-called “justice”.
To see the contracting natures of civilization and the CCP regime, we make an analogy with food. Normally, we respect other people’s choice for food. For instance, Ann prefers rice, Bob prefers noodles, John is a meat lover, Mary only eats seafood, etc. Although those four people have different choices of what they like to eat, they respect each other’s choices of food. However, when Daniel comes over and tells the group that he prefers to eat faeces and needs to be respected for his preference, we can start to see the ridiculousness in it. At first, the four people think eating faeces is a personal choice for Daniel, and Daniel can do whatever he/she wants as long as he/she does it at his/her home. The problem rises when Daniel starts to force other people to eat faeces, while the other four people think faeces is inedible, and should never be served on a plate.
The food analogy tells us that the CCP regime is inherently against human civilization. As a reasonable human being could not categorize feces as food, we should not be tricked to believe that the authoritarian regime of China can blend in and contribute to human civilization. The CCP regime is incompatible to human civilization just like we should not consider to eat a meal with feces in it. As the master of CCP, Mao, admitted, one can never resolve the contradiction between the authoritarian regime of China and human civilization. The existence of Chinese authoritarian regime is a symbol for deprivation of human civilization. For us to maintain and preserve human civilization, Chinese authoritarian regime must be eradicated. There is no room for the coexistence of the CCP regime and human civilization.
Draw a Bottom Line to the Respect for Diversity
Therefore, among western countries, the United States have started or should start to realize that although diversity needs to be respected and tolerated, a reasonable bottom line should be drawn to such respect. Like what I have mentioned above, rice, noodles, meat, seafood and so on should be viewed as food; however, as we can all reasonably agree, feces should not be a part of the league. The United States is now acting to exclude “feces” from the democratic league and draw a bottom line for respect-worthy diversity. However, leading EU countries are still trapped in their fancy, unconditional acceptance to “respect for diversity.” Such respect is hypocritical, empty and baseless. Now, you should be able to understand why leftards in the EU would vigorously criticize death sentences executed under a legitimate judicial system but remain indifferent to the CCP regime’s merciless, relentless and oppressive killings. Namely, they simply set a wrong premise, including feces as an eligible option for “diversity.” As for those who embrace the CCP regime because of economic benefits, they do not even deserve to be viewed as EU leftards, but merely gold diggers in the EU.
--
Special Thanks to our supporters in North America for translation🙏
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過22萬的網紅香港花生,也在其Youtube影片中提到,來源視頻 和 金融原理解釋,見本頁頁底。 ----------- 網上討論會 (請在本視頻的議論欄發言。有見地的內容,我會抄貼到這裏下面。) 討論會題目﹕ 假如郭文貴關於港幣貶值的預言屬實,港府(如突然敢冒大不諱行駛基本法賦與的高度自治權)可以做什麼,來挽救廣大市民,避免或減少損失? ^^^^^^^...
subprime mortgage 在 ลงทุนแมน Facebook 的最佳貼文
Mortgage crisis อาจกลับมาอีกครั้ง / โดย ลงทุนแมน
การแพร่ระบาดของเชื้อไวรัสโคโรนา ทำให้เกิดผลกระทบทางเศรษฐกิจอย่างมหาศาล
ธุรกิจแทบทุกประเภทต้องหยุดชะงักลง
แต่นั่นอาจจะเป็นเพียงคลื่นลูกแรกเท่านั้นของวิกฤตินี้..
คลื่นลูกที่สองที่กำลังจะซัดเข้าเศรษฐกิจโลก อาจเป็นสิ่งที่เราเคยเผชิญมาแล้ว
นั่นคือ Mortgage crisis
╔═══════════╗
Blockdit แหล่งรวมบทความวิเคราะห์
เจาะลึกแบบ deep content
ล่าสุดมีฟีเจอร์พอดแคสต์แล้ว
Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
Mortgage คือการจำนองบ้านหรือที่อยู่อาศัยให้กับธนาคาร ผู้กู้จะได้เงินก้อน แลกกับผ่อนคืนเงินต้น และจ่ายดอกเบี้ยให้ธนาคาร
ย้อนกลับไปเมื่อปี 2008-2009
เหตุการณ์ Subprime Mortgage Crisis เกิดจากการที่ธนาคารปล่อยสินเชื่อประเภท Subprime เป็นจำนวนมาก และมีการเก็งกำไรในอสังหาริมทรัพย์ ทำให้เกิดฟองสบู่ในตลาดที่อยู่อาศัยของสหรัฐอเมริกา
หนึ่งในบริษัทชื่อดังที่เสียหายหนักคือ Lehman Brothers ที่ต้องล้มละลายไปในปี 2008
โดยจากมูลค่าบริษัท 1.6 ล้านล้านบาทหายไปในพริบตา..
ในวันนี้ทั่วโลกเกิดวิกฤติทางเศรษฐกิจอีกครั้ง
เมืองต่างๆ ต้องปิด ห้ามเดินทางเข้าออก ผู้คนกักตัวอยู่ในบ้าน ร้านค้าต้องปิดให้บริการ
เมื่อมองจากปัจจัยต่างๆ จึงมีความเป็นไปได้ว่าจะเกิดการผิดนัดชำระหนี้ขึ้นมา
เพราะผู้กู้ธนาคารไม่มีรายได้มาจ่ายดอกเบี้ย
พอไม่มีจ่าย ผู้กู้ก็จะปล่อยให้ธนาคารยึดบ้านไป
เราเรียกทรัพย์สินทางการเงินที่ถูกค้ำประกันโดยสินเชื่อบ้านของธนาคารว่า Mortgage Backed Securities
สัญญาณของเรื่องนี้ก็คือ เริ่มมีการเทขาย Mortgage Backed Securities ออกมากกว่า 41,000 ล้านบาทแล้ว รวมถึงมีสถาบันการเงินเร่งให้รัฐบาลสหรัฐฯ ให้ความช่วยเหลือทางการเงินในสินทรัพย์เหล่านี้
แปลเป็นนัยหนึ่งว่า ผู้ถืออาจเริ่มไม่มั่นใจในความน่าเชื่อถือของสินทรัพย์เหล่านี้แล้ว
Mortgage Backed Securities ตั้งอยู่บนความเชื่อที่ว่าคนต้องจ่ายเงินเพื่อให้มีบ้านอยู่
แต่ถ้าคนไม่มีเงินจริงๆ ต่อให้เขาอยากอยู่แต่หาเงินมาจ่ายไม่ได้ ก็ต้องเบี้ยวหนี้อยู่ดี
ตัวอย่างของผลกระทบจะเริ่มจากเจ้าของร้านขายของไม่ได้ จ่ายค่าเช่าไม่ได้ ไม่มีเงินจ่ายค่าจ้างพนักงาน พนักงานขาดรายได้ พนักงานจ่ายดอกเบี้ยเงินกู้ไม่ได้ ธนาคารขาดรายได้ ผลกระทบจะเป็นลูกโซ่และระบบจะหยุดชะงักลง
ถ้าหากมันเกิดขึ้นจะส่งผลกระทบเป็นลูกโซ่อีกครั้งเหมือนปี 2008-2009
โดยจะมีบ้านหลุดจำนองจำนวนมาก การฟ้องร้องมากมาย และสถาบันการเงินล้มละลาย
แต่ครั้งนี้มันจะไม่เกิดขึ้นเพียงสหรัฐอเมริกาหรือยุโรปเท่านั้น
เพราะผลกระทบจากโควิด-19 นั้นรุนแรงจนธุรกิจทั่วโลกต้องหยุดชะงัก
และนั่นหมายถึงมันจะกลายเป็น Mortgage crisis ทั่วโลก..
ทางเลือกเดียวที่ธนาคารต่างๆ พอจะทำได้ในตอนนี้ คือต้องผ่อนผันการชำระหนี้ โดยอาจจะต้องยืดเวลาออกไปก่อนอีกสัก 60-90 วันเพื่อต่อลมหายใจให้กับผู้กู้ในช่วงวิกฤตินี้
นอกจากนี้ทางธนาคารกลางสหรัฐมีแผนที่จะซื้อพันธบัตรแบบ Unlimited
แต่.. ใช่ว่าทุกประเทศจะสามารถทำได้เหมือนสหรัฐฯ
ดังนั้นแม้สหรัฐฯ จะสามารถป้องกัน Mortgage crisis ในประเทศได้
แต่ประเทศอื่นๆ ทั่วโลกก็จะเผชิญปัญหาการผิดนัดชำระหนี้อยู่ดี
ปิดท้ายด้วยข้อมูลที่น่าสนใจ
ณ ตอนนี้ธนาคารกลางสหรัฐได้ออกมาตรการในการซื้อพันธบัตรจำนวนมหาศาลแล้ว
ซึ่งคาดว่าจะใช้ QE สูงถึง 66 ล้านล้านบาท และอาจเพิ่มขึ้นได้อย่างไม่จำกัดเพื่อกระตุ้นเศรษฐกิจ
แต่ก็ต้องติดตามว่าจะแก้ปัญหานี้ได้หรือไม่ เพราะ Mortgage Backed Securities และสินเชื่ออสังหาริมทรัพย์เพื่อการพาณิชย์ในสหรัฐอเมริกามีมูลค่าสูงถึง 524 ล้านล้านบาทเลยทีเดียว..
╔═══════════╗
Blockdit แหล่งรวมบทความวิเคราะห์
เจาะลึกแบบ deep content
ล่าสุดมีฟีเจอร์พอดแคสต์แล้ว
Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
ติดตามลงทุนแมนได้ที่
Website - longtunman.com
Blockdit - blockdit.com/longtunman
Facebook - ลงทุนแมน
Twitter - twitter.com/longtunman
Instagram - instagram.com/longtunman
Line - page.line.me/longtunman
YouTube - youtube.com/longtunman
References
-https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-23/mortgage-bond-sales-flood-market-amid-pleas-for-help-from-u-s
-https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2020-03-23/barrack-sees-commercial-mortgage-collapse-if-liquidity-crisis-isn-t-addressed-video
-https://finance.yahoo.com/news/real-estate-billionaire-barrack-says-230309693.html
-https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/09/lehman-brothers-collapse.asp#the-bottom-line
-https://www.wsj.com/articles/mortgage-firms-brace-for-wave-of-missed-payments-as-coronavirus-slams-homeowners-11585017857
-https://www.ft.com/content/b71f0c32-6cfb-11ea-89df-41bea055720b
subprime mortgage 在 蘇浩 Anthony So Facebook 的精選貼文
***NEW op-ed***
Read Hong Kong Watch's Director, Johnny Patterson, explaining in the Financial Times why reforms to the extradition law threaten Hong Kong's reputation:
"Misgivings about the changes have been well documented. The city’s democrats and business groups say that the move potentially jeopardises the city’s “one-country, two-systems” framework and its autonomy from China. A lack of trust in the judicial system in China — and worries that the Hong Kong chief executive will be unable to reject dubious extradition requests — has led to a fear that journalists, activists and Beijing’s political opponents may face arbitrary extradition.
More than 100,000 attended a rally in April. The Hong Kong Bar Association, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have condemned the move, and Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, has called the proposals “an assault on Hong Kong’s values, stability and security”.
One of the two activists now living in Germany, Ray Wong, has said that the reason he is publicly disclosing his successful asylum claim is because of concerns about these amendments: “I will never be able to come back if Hong Kong can extradite me back to China once I return,” he said. “It is important for me to speak up as one of the first political refugees of Hong Kong.”
I have conducted a range of interviews behind closed doors, on condition of anonymity, with senior executives at international banks, hedge fund managers and financial analysts, which expose the reasons for the business community's concerns. A managing director at an Asian bank said that business people were “very worried” about the law because, “In China, the legal system is a bit opaque, and the head of businesses have been imprisoned.”
For one hedge fund manager, concerns about the extradition law are a symptom of “booksellers’ syndrome” — a fear among Hong Kong’s elite that the mainland government will treat them in a manner similar to the five Hong Kong booksellers who were abducted and arbitrarily detained in mainland China in 2015, or the tycoon Xiao Jianhua, who was abducted from the Four Seasons Hotel in 2017.
Likewise, a managing director at a major European bank, said: “The extradition law taps into fears of a midnight knock on the door.” A second hedge fund manager said the threat implied by the legislation would affect his ability to forecast Hong Kong’s finance honestly: “If the extradition law is in effect, I cannot be neutral or objective in my financial analysis; I will have to praise the motherland.
If the government of Hong Kong decides not to compromise, dissatisfaction with the proposed amendments may have several implications. First, the amendments could seriously damage Hong Kong’s international reputation. “One country, two systems” is a very successful brand for Hong Kong. It allows the city to be Asia’s global city, with all the privileges and prosperity that entails.
But the brand requires the endorsement of the international community... J Kyle Bass, a hedge fund manager who predicted the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, recently wrote a letter to investors arguing that the extradition law could put Hong Kong’s privileged relationship with the US under threat. One senior executive I spoke to agreed: “The extradition bill could fundamentally derail the integrity of ‘one country, two systems’.”
https://www.ft.com/con…/3ccdba9e-7c9e-11e9-8b5c-33d0560f039c
subprime mortgage 在 香港花生 Youtube 的最佳解答
來源視頻 和 金融原理解釋,見本頁頁底。
-----------
網上討論會
(請在本視頻的議論欄發言。有見地的內容,我會抄貼到這裏下面。)
討論會題目﹕
假如郭文貴關於港幣貶值的預言屬實,港府(如突然敢冒大不諱行駛基本法賦與的高度自治權)可以做什麼,來挽救廣大市民,避免或減少損失?
^^^^^^^^^^今後, 以上管叫[總題目]^^^^^^^^^^
F (Zen Gong指 1. 中國銀行發鈔,有可能背後的美元儲備有水份。2. 發鈔量是美元儲備的4.2倍。 )
1. Money Supply M2 in Hong Kong is $14,063 billion HKD in August 2018. HK's Foreign Exchange Reserves is $424.8 billion USD in August.
https://tradingeconomics.com/hong-kon...
https://tradingeconomics.com/hong-kon...
The problem is: the figures are provided by all banks based on a honest system. HSBC & HK Chartered Bank are British banks they would play by the rule. But China Bank (HK)'s $USD reserve is in HK or Beijin? as part of China's $USD? i.e. they can have no $USD at all in HK. M1 are bank notes, bank credit & plastic monies, M2/M3 include short/long term credit. They can switch between easily that make auditing extremely difficult.
2. In HK's Foreign Exchange Reserve basket the composition mainly (80+% by IMF rule) is $USD, rest are Euro, Yen and Yuan. The fixed rate is a 7.8. The $USD reserve is USD$424.8 billion and HK's M2 money supply is HK$14,063 billion in August. The variable/unpegged rate should be HK$14,063/US$424.8=33.1 not 7.8 today. Or, USD $424.8B x 7.8= HK $3,313 billion its USD reserve can support, not HK$14, 063 billion M2. HK printed 4.2 times monies it should, not including M3 (long term credit) and figures provided by banks might be grossly exaggerated.
E (KIU WAI LAM 提供一些具體數字)
香港最新外匯儲備資產數字
香港金融管理局(金管局)2018年10月5日(星期五)公布,香港於2018年9月底的官方外匯儲備資產為4,264億美元(2018年8月底為4,248億美元)(附件)。
連同未交收外匯合約在內,香港於2018年9月底的外匯儲備資產為4,188億美元(2018年8月底為4,172億美元)。
為數4,264億美元的外匯儲備資產總額,相當於香港流通貨幣約7倍,或港元貨幣供應M3約46%。
D (原來“ 路德社”頻道有更專業和深入的討論,我請你請參考)
連結: https://youtu.be/Tx7oY042u7g
10/13/2018 路德时评(对冲基金大佬良心小哥):这几天大量突增的对港币维稳的洗脑文章,以及12日港财政司司长突赴京与央行行长商讨对策,港币是否能夠撐的住?(普通話)
點題:
1. 設郭文貴說白港幣將貶值的(中國日期)10月10日是day 1; days 2 & 3 立刻發生幾件事:(i)國內有貌似專業的長文講港元不會同美元脱鈎, 被容許發表;但列舉了香港M0, M1, M3的數字, 偏偏不提最相關的M2。(ii)財政司司長陳茂波赴京見中央銀行行長易綱, 但報導非常簡短,耐人尋味; 可能反映他們要暗示中央會為港元托底, 但又不敢說白有危機。
2. 全面回顧了1997年索羅斯狙擊港元的歷史, 及其意義, 又指出事前事後北京可都視索羅斯為"中國的老朋友", 貴為上賓。
3. 嘉賓講者特別提出, 索羅斯狙擊英鎊和其他金融操作佳績連年, 當年狙擊港元卻要敗退, 是中共津津樂道的威水史, 但是, 剛剛以非法交易罪宣判郭文貴的政泉公司案罰款600億人民幣破了全球有史以來最高罰金的紀錄, 卻無大吹大擂, 是盜國賊自知理虧, 底氣不足, 缺乏自信, 末日近矣。
4. 1:21:00有網友問港府可不可以禁止做空港幣, 算是對下面A貼的[總題目]的一個回答, 嘉賓講者以A3的邏輯回答。從路德的總結, 又可推算即使港府敢開徵「炒港幣稅」, 中共也麻煩,因為暴露了盜國賊違法造成港幣超發來吸金,將斷了這條吸金的通道,配合當世界出現其他反共招數的時候, 中共少了這金融“後援”, 會加速潰敗。這也局部回答了A5的道德兩難的困惑。
C (明杜志可算是回應以下的A4點)
1. hk foreign reserve got only 300 billion us dollars
2. 沖唔到港元架,香港有2萬億港元再加銀行體糸可以回撥,金管局可以下令唔借港元比外資沽空,其實97金融風暴已經沖過,佢地沽港股抽高個息再沽港元,結果佢地都係輸住走,如果甘易沽到港元脫勾,港元一早脫左啦
B (Eric Chan 可算是回應以下的A5點)
身為香港人, 雖然唔情願港紙遭受狙擊, 但若一時陣痛換來長治久安, 香港人亦唯有默默承受!!
[從這裏開始,... 的符號表示原文已大幅刪節,因為Youtube說明欄的上限是5000字符,業已超過。請到Tsui Hon Kwong頻道和花生台本視頻的留言欄閱讀全文。]
A (我自己來開個頭)
Tsui Hon Kwong: 港府可以宣佈徵收「炒港幣稅」!細節如下。
1. 把正常經濟活動和炒買炒賣港幣兩種行為分開。再細節,1.1 例如,...如能開具證明,是正常經濟活動所需,不在規管範圍之內。...1.2 怎樣防止假證明?...尤其是,盜國賊最清楚是他們自己造假或行賄造成港幣超發的,...他們深知加入炒賣必賺,就會出盡法寶假扮是正常經濟活動;...。在個難題上,仍有待大家...。
2. 把炒港幣的潛在利潤,用稅收抽走。再細節,2.1 某個銀碼以下的兌換,保留免稅,...。那麼,界線該劃在哪裏好呢?我認為在一千萬美元左右較恰當。...。2.2 稅率多少才好?至少要同潛在利潤掛鈎,...。
3. 徵收「炒港幣稅」會不會沾污香港是自由貿易港的美名,影響到經濟步向蕭條?...
4. 「炒港幣稅」是否有效?是不是有重大缺失,根本不可行?...
5. 道德兩難問題﹕一方面,郭文貴認為港幣貶值將在中共倒台、全國實現民主法治的過程中起得到關鍵作用,...。另一方面,最避不開港幣大貶值的是...基層人民...;整體經濟、民生發展、方方面面都會出現極大困難;再...漫延到全國,以致郭文貴都說﹕「...我心裏很難受,我跨不過那個坎,因為我看到這些行動真的在實踐中,我真的很難受。...,好幾次我在陽台...,眼淚就掉下來,受不了呀。」...這,就是道德兩難:找方法避免貶值或減弱貶值及其帶來的損失,是道德的嗎?...
-----------
詞語解釋(出場序)
CCP ----- 中國共產黨, China Communist Party
Kayle Bass ----- 美國對沖基金經理人。Wikipedia: In 2008, Bass successfully predicted and effectively bet against the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis by purchasing credit default swaps on subprime securities which, in turn, increased in value when the real estate bubble burst.
Bass has made prominent bets on Japan, European sovereign debt and, most recently, China. He has also given his expectations regarding the economic future of Japan and Argentina.
P2P ----- peer to peer, 一種網路借貸平臺,由非政府、非銀行的機構集資,答應投資人優厚利率,然後貸款給需要資金的企業或個人。幾年前中共許多官員為這些新興的金融機構站台,從民間圈到許多資金。數月前國內大量P2P公司倒閉或負責人挾款失蹤,令投資者血本無歸。論者認為都是被貪官掠去了。
泛亞 ----- 如上,也是國內一間集資公司,許多官員向全國公眾推薦,說既安全、回報又高。幾年前又倒閉,令許多投資者賠上畢生積蓄。論者認為都是被貪官掠去了。
民族證券 ----- 郭文貴在國內的公司之一。損害郭的利益的目標之一。盜國賊殘害其員工,掠奪其資產;都是為了要脅郭就範,迫他停止點名揭露諸如王歧山等盜國賊的違法網絡和罪行。
徐明 ---- 冤案主角, 大連實德集團董事長, 2013年因涉薄熙來案,獲刑入獄, 作為污點證人指證薄熙來貪腐, 獄中表現良好, 提前釋放, 但在即將獲釋前猝死
李明 ----- 冤案主角, 著名影视公司小马奔腾董事长,涉公安部副部长李东生案被带走协助调查,官方说李明在询问中情绪激动,注射了镇静剂之后不治身亡。
雷洋 ----- 冤案主角, 北京便衣警察懷疑市民雷洋有嫖娼行為,在拘捕過程中雷洋逃脫後被再次拘捕,押解途中雷洋死亡。次日,該事件發布到網絡,引起了輿論的廣泛關注。官方說他是因為自瀆而死
「我的弟弟」----- 郭文貴、他弟弟和另一個女性家人(可能是嫂嫂)是1989年支持天安門學生運動的北京市民之中的三個。三人被捕,警局中有警員拔槍要殺女家人,他弟弟撲過去保護她,中彈,失救而死。
孟建柱 ----- 郭文貴揭露違法罪行的四名頭號盜國賊之一。
王樂泉 ----- 中共官員,官至中共中央政治局委员,新疆維吾爾自治區黨委書記。2010年被中共免去在新疆的所有職務。现任中国法学会会长。
----------------------------------------------------------
來源視頻﹕
https://youtu.be/rwttNTC0Izo
10月9号:C C P如果攻击台湾,美国会不会出兵?为什么说港币和人民币会垮掉?保护台湾香港极为重要!
(郭文貴頻道,美國日期2018.10.9) (普通話)
金融原理﹕
https://youtu.be/YPC6bhJv760
为什么说香港也会存在货币超发?为什么历史上阻击做空港币比较困难?为什么此次上万亿美元阻击港币加上金融大杀器一定能够成功?
(路德社直播台,美國日期2018.10.9) (普通話)
subprime mortgage 在 The Sub Prime Mortgage Crisis - YouTube 的推薦與評價
This short video looks at the sub prime mortgage crisis that was the major fuel igniting the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2010. ... <看更多>